Northwestern Mutual rescinds disability policy after claimant paid premiums for 15 years
When you apply for a disability policy, it is very important to answer all questions as truthfully as you can. The courts generally will not render a summary judgment in favor of the disability insurance company if the company can’t prove that you answered a question with the intent to defraud. If you don’t have a solid explanation for why you answered a question falsely, you may find yourself losing your coverage or facing a jury trial to determine whether you should receive your long-term disability benefits or not.
This is what happened to Richard Koch. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington for a summary judgment against Mr. Koch and rescission of his disability policies. At issue? Three disability insurance policies that Koch had purchased from Northwestern Mutual.
Two of these policies were issued on December 23, 1992 contingent upon Mr. Koch participating in an oral personal history interview, which he did on January 14, 1993. A third policy was issued on February 28, 1994, which did not require an oral interview.
When Koch was diagnosed 15 years later on May 1, 2007 with Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction, he proceeded to file a claim under his three disability insurance policies. This claim was received by Northwestern Mutual (“Northwestern”) on May 23, 2007 and investigations into the validity of the claim commenced on June 6, 2007.
Koch was asked to supply medical records. He did so, providing records from three physicians. One of the doctor’s notes mentioned that Koch had received prior treatment for bipolar disorder and suggested that first treatment went back 15 years prior, before the first policies were issued.
The disability insurance company, Northwestern Mutual, saw this as proof that Koch had answered a series of questions in his oral interview falsely, with the intent to defraud. Northwestern also argued that Koch had misrepresented information to secure the third policy. They pursued a motion for summary judgment against Koch.
Northwestern’s argument? That Koch had purposely given false answers to a set of material questions asked of him in an oral interview, removing all obligations to pay disability benefits to Koch. Koch, the defendant, moved that the Court strike the Plaintiff’s use of his oral personal history interview as a basis for rescinding his disability insurance policies.
How did the court handle this case?
Because there were three policies, the facts had to be weighed against each policy separately. The court ruled that the oral interview was a basis for rescinding his insurance policies, but that first Northwestern Mutual would have to prove that Koch had willfully intended to deceive.
Many of the questions involved in his interview were of such a nature that Koch’s answers could not be proven to be false. For example, one question had asked him if he had been medically treated within the last 10 years for a mental, nervous or psychiatric disorder. Even his treating physician said that he had never used those terms in conversation with Koch, so it was reasonable for Koch to answer no.
Another question which the insurer felt had been answered falsely involved whether Koch had been treated or advised by a physician or practitioner. Koch claimed that he didn’t consider a psychiatrist or psychotherapist a physician or practitioner, so he had answered no. Because there was a question as to whether Koch had knowingly given a false answer, the court could not render a summary judgment on this point.
The insurer had also asked Koch whether he had in the last five years been a patient in a hospital, clinic or medical facility. Koch did not feel his visits to his doctor fit this description, so he again answered no.
When the insurer asked Koch if he had had an EKG, X-ray or other test, he answered no, not thinking anything of the blood work his physician had ordered.
Northwestern asked Koch if any family members had ever been diagnosed with mental illness. Koch claims that he answered negatively because he did not consider depression a mental illness, even though his two brothers had undergone treatment for depression.
There was one question during the oral interview, though, that resulted in the court rendering a summary judgment for Northwestern Mutual on the first two policies. The question? Had Koch “consulted any other health care providers such as osteopaths, chiropractors, psychiatrists, outpatient clinics, emergency rooms, or any other type of doctors within the past five years?” Koch answered no. The medical records proved that Koch had seen a psychiatrist during the six months prior to his interview; therefore Koch had provided Northwestern with false information.
Because of that answer, the court issued a summary judgment for Northwestern Mutual in connection with the first two policies Koch purchased. Koch’s counterclaims for those two policies were dismissed because the ruling invalidated Northwestern Mutual’s obligation to fulfill them.
This left only the third policy in question. Because questions remained as to whether Koch had purposely sought to defraud his insurer, the court denied summary judgment for Northwestern Mutual and reserved judgment on the third policy. Koch’s case will continue; however only one out of his three long-term disability policies is valid.
Don’t find yourself in Koch’s situation. Misrepresentation to a disability insurer will always cause major problems for a disability claimant. One way to deal with a situation such as Mr. Koch’s is to speak with a disability insurance attorney prior to even filing your claim for long-term disability benefits. Depending upon the law of the state governing your policy and the language in the disability policy, a misrepresentation does not always cause a policy to be rescinded. Some court will consider whether a misrepresentation was material; yet other courts will look very closely at the timing of the misrepresentation and whether the insurance company knew or should have known about the alleged misrepresentation. I always tell my clients that the truth is easy to deal with; however a lie will usually destroy a claim for disability benefits.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Northwestern Mutual Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Northwestern Mutual appeal.
Sue Northwestern Mutual
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Northwestern Mutual.
Get Your Northwestern Mutual Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Northwestern Mutual Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
NWM refused to have a hematologist review my claim since my "numbers are currently normal." They ignored my primary concern of relapsing
Q: Are there successful arguments to appeal Northwestern Mutual’s offset of claimant’s LTB by the amount of SSD benefits awarded?
Q: Why does Northwestern ask the questions they do in the "Request for Continuation of Disability Benefits" form?
Q: Why is NWM reviewing my claim when my condition hasn't changed? Is it strange that they requested an in-person review?
Q: Can NWM rescind my policy because I forgot to disclose an illness I had 20 years ago (that I no longer have)? Do I have to sign their release to access everything about me?
Q: Can you explain why NWM is still paying me while my claim is being reviewed? They said if they don't approve it, their accomodation payment is not owed back to them.
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, NWM overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for California Customer Relations Supervisor
Northwestern Mutual Reinstates Disability Benefits to Attorney Suffering From Gastrointestinal Problems
Northwestern Mutual sued by shareholder attorney for underpaying and denying long-term disability benefits
Northwestern Mutual denies partial disability benefits to trial attorney resulting in lawsuit for violations of Washington Insurance Fair Conduct Act
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.