Hartford’s Life Insurance companies reliance on surveillance video to terminate benefits was appropriate

Citation: Kiloh v. Hartford Life Ins. Co., No. 8:04-cv-1741-T-24TGW, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18681, (M.D. Fla. Aug. 31, 2005).

William Kiloh was employed as a boatman for the Tampa Bay Pilots. He became disabled and unable to work due to hepatitis C, lumbar radiculopathy and failed back syndrome. Mr. Kiloh began receiving long-term disability benefits in November 1996 until April 2003, when Hartford Life Insurance Company (hereinafter “Hartford”) discovered, through a seven-day video surveillance, evidence indicating Mr. Kiloh’s physical capabilities far exceeded the limitations that he described to Hartford’s interviewer and his treating physicians. Specifically, Hartford found that the video surveillance showing Mr. Kiloh working on his boat, bending, climbing a ladder, lifting heavy objects and using a leaf blower directly contradicted Mr. Kiloh’s self proclaimed physical limitations such as an inability to perform activities in excess of an hour despite being on pain relievers, an inability to stand for periods longer than 10 to 15 minutes and an inability to carry anything heavier than a gallon of milk.

Mr. Kiloh brought suit against Hartford seeking to reinstate his benefits. Mr. Kiloh claimed entitlement to continued disability benefits because Hartford erroneously relied on limited medical records to reach its decision and that the disability surveillance video relied upon was irrelevant because it was taken during a period of unusually high activity because he was moving homes and was taking extra doses of pain medication.

The Florida court found that Hartford did not improperly render its decision based on limited medical records because five months before the termination of his benefits, Mr. Kiloh told Hartford that he had only two current treating physicians. Moreover, the court found that Hartford’s reliance on the surveillance video was proper because in this case, it was objective evidence that Mr. Kiloh’s physical capabilities exceeded his self-reported limitations, and as such, Hartford’s use of video surveillance was appropriate.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

FAQ

Do you help Hartford claimants nationwide?

We represent Hartford clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Hartford disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Hartford. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Hartford.

How do you help Hartford claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Hartford long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Hartford:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Steven W.

“Whatever it Takes”, and you can take that to the bank, as I did. I was declared disabled in March 2010 after unsuccessful Back surgeries, CSC Implants, numerous other treatments, all which failed. I was (and still am) in constant pain requiring medication therapy and managment. June 2012, after receiving my benefit for 18 months I received a letter from my CIGNA case worker stating I no longer meet the contract definition of Disability. Therefore they stopped my benefit immediately. My numerous attempts at trying to resolve my Reinstatement Request was bogged down with hidden agendas, request for test after test, loosing documents from critical doctors supporting my claim, never returning my calls.

I contacted Dell & Schaefer, Alex Palamara, for a free consultation. He replied the same day. We spoke briefly and set an appointment the following day to pass detailed information. I faxed to him all supporting documents. In the beginning I was sceptical. But after a few weeks I could sense that they were a no BS organisation. I began to feel like they were really working hard for me. Throught the somewhat long process I was very impressed with the way they handled my case. They kept me informed of all issues via Email or calls. Never, never, did Alex (Mr. Palamara) or any of his staff fail to reply within 24 hours and usually within the same day to any of my request. I can’t say enough about the professionalism, courtesy, care, with the way they handled my case. My long hours of research have lead me to believe that Dell & Schaefer are by far the LTD hardest working informed agency out there. And, they would prove me right: as just recently I received a letter from Alex Palamara, forwarded from CIGNA stating a full reversal of my claim to begin immediately with full back pay and monthly benefits.

I cannot thank Alex and his staff enough for the fight they must have endured from CIGNA’s attorneys.

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us