Dentist wins right to apply stricter standard of review in her case against Hartford for a claim for long-term disability benefits

(Group / ERISA Disability Policy) Carol Post, a dentist working at a hospital in New Jersey, was involved in a car accident in November 1993. Despite her whiplash injuries, she returned to work as a dentist, but was forced to stop working as a dentist because of her severe pain. She attempted in December 1993 to return to work as a pharmacist, since she also held a pharmacy degree. Ms. Post worked for nine months as a pharmacist and then was forced to stop working in September 1994 due to continued pain. During the period when she worked as a pharmacist, she averaged nearly a day per week that she was unable to work because of the pain. Ms. Post tried numerous physical therapy treatments that did not significantly improve her condition before attempting to return to work again in January 1995. Unfortunately she was forced to stop working once again in May 1995, because of her continued pain.

Evidence of Ms. Post’s treatment included records from 14 doctors over 10 years, beginning in 1993 following her accident. The treatments for her pain included:

None of these treatments provided significant relief to her pain. Her neurologist, a professor at Columbia University, opined that her numerous medical conditions, such as severe myofascial pain, chronic debilitating headaches, sensitivity to light, nausea, vomiting, and irritable bowel syndrome, and insomnia were caused by her car accident and rendered Ms. Post totally disabled. Hartford paid total disability benefits from 1995 until 2002, and Ms. Post was approved for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits on August 7, 1998.

After paying Ms. Post disability benefits for seven years, Hartford abruptly terminated her benefits in January 2002, following a review of her file by Hartford’s medical director, in which Hartford’s doctor concluded that Ms. Post was not totally disabled. After exhausting her administrative remedies by filing two appelas, Ms. Post then filed suit for her disability benefits, but the trial court entered judgment against her, agreeing with Hartford’s argument.

Hartford argued that the medical records revealed Ms. Post had only a whiplash injury, relying mostly on the medical records review performed by its own physician and an independent medical examination. Hartford also based their denial on feedback from doctors who treated Ms. Post in 1994 and 1996, on forms prepared by Hartford that did not allow these treating physicians to indicate that Ms. Post was totally unable to work.

On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, in Philadelphia disagreed with the trial court, noting that the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania had not properly considered that:

  1. Hartford’s denial was largely based on the review of Ms. Post’s medical records by its own physician;
  2. That Ms. Post had received a fully favorable decision on her SSDI claim; and,
  3. That Hartford aggressively used disability surveillance in an attempt to show that Ms. Post was not disabled.

Individually, each of these items was not enough to show that Hartford might have acted improperly in cutting of Ms. Post’s disability benefits. However, the Appellate Court ruled that based on the totality of all the carrier’s actions, the lower court could have found in favor of Ms. Post.

As a practical note, the lower court will have to reconsider their previous decision and re-evaluate Ms. Post’s case. There is no guarantee that Ms. Post will receive benefits even as the trial court looks at the evidence a second time, but at least Ms. Post will be given a second chance.

See Post v. Hartford Ins. Co., 501 F. 3d 154 (3d Cir. 2007).

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

FAQ

Do you help Hartford claimants nationwide?

We represent Hartford clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Hartford disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Hartford. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Hartford.

How do you help Hartford claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Hartford long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Hartford:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Diane H. (Maryland)

I am a 62-year-old woman that got injured on the job and was unable to work. I had long term insurance that was paid by my job. In September 2017, I request a buyout from The Hartford insurance company. After receiving no word from The Hartford insurance company, for 10 months, I made the decision, to seek legal action.

My experience with Dell & Schaefer, particularly Attorney Rachel Alters and her staff was brilliant. I was very fortunate to get Attorney Rachel Alters to represent me on my case. From the time of my first conservation with Attorney Rachel Alters, I knew she had my best interest at heart, I felt confident that my case would be an open and shut case.

All my questions are always answered, I never felt confused in the process, and phone calls are always returned the same day if possible or the next. My e-mails were always answered in a timely matter.

Words cannot express how grateful I am for Attorney Rachel Alters, and her staff assisting me in the short amount of time that was given for the success in my case. Attorney Rachel Alters worked so diligently hard in my disability buyout case to bring a settlement as quickly as possible. In addition, Attorney Rachel Alters, is very detailed oriented, and follows through if there are delays.

Thank you for everything that you’ve done to help and support me. I am so grateful to Rachel Alters and her staff. They are awesome!

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us