Northwestern Mutual Disability Claim Denial Reversed By Court
A Colorado court recently brought down a very harsh ruling against Northwestern for blatantly abusing its discretion in denying long-term disability benefits to a Colorado Family Law Attorney (Mr. M) who suffered congestive heart failure and underwent aortic valve replacement surgery and thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.
Two interesting issues were addressed by the Court in its ruling. The first is the applicability of a certain Colorado statute (Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-3-1116), and the second is Northwestern’s interpretation of the plan’s own occupation definition of disability in the context of Mr. M being an attorney specializing in the practice of Family Law.
Colorado law does not permit plan or claim administrators to reserve discretion to interpret the terms of the policy or determine eligibility for benefits
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-3-1116 states in pertinent part that:
- A first-party claimant… whose claim for payment of benefits has been unreasonably delayed or denied may bring an action in a district court to recover reasonably attorneys fees and court costs and two times the covered benefit.
- An insurance policy, insurance contract, or plan that is issued in this state that offers health or disability benefits shall not contain a provision purporting to reserve discretion to the insurer, plan administrator, or claim administrator to interpret the terms of the policy, contract, or plan or to determine eligibility for benefits.
- An insurance policy, contract or plan that is issued in this state shall provide that a person who claims health, life or disability benefits, whose claim has been denied in whole or in part, and who has exhausted his or her administrative remedies shall be entitled to have his or her claim reviewed de novo in any court with jurisdiction and to a trial by jury.
This statute went into effect in August 2008. Mr. M’s policy with Northwestern became effective on March 1, 1995. The Colorado Supreme Court holds clearly that this statute will not apply retroactively. However, Mr. M argued that, because his firm renewed the policy in 2009, the renewed policy is subject to the terms and conditions of the statue.
Unfortunately, the Court did not agree with Mr. M. It found that to apply this statute to the renewal of a 13 year old policy would impose new obligations and restrictions that were not considered when the parties originally executed the policy. Parties should know and understand their obligations under a policy at the time it is issued and it would not make sense for policies to be automatically altered based on the “whim” of Colorado’s legislature.
Northwestern was wrong in its interpretation of the policy’s “own occupation” definition of disability
In its letter upholding the denial of Mr. M’s claim for long term disability benefits, Northwestern explained that it was not required to consider Mr. M’s occupation specifically as a Family Law attorney or “Divorce Law Litigator”, nor was it limited to considering the types of cases he handled as “high conflict/high asset/children with special needs litigation” cases. Northwestern stated that the Own Occupation definition was not workplace or employer specific, but rather, it referred to a set of duties as they are performed in a typical industry setting. Accordingly, Northwestern analyzed whether Mr. M was disabled based on the general duties of a lawyer and did not take into consideration his specific duties in practicing family law.
The Court determined that Northwestern was wrong by not taking into consideration Mr. M’s specific duties as a family law attorney. In oral argument, Northwestern argued that Mr. M chose not to return to work in the practice of family law and that he could have chosen to practice law in another area because he was qualified to do so as a “general practitioner”. The Court states that, while attorneys are not technically permitted to “specialize” in certain areas of law, the reality is that most do practice within a narrow field and this serves to allow the attorney to hone his/her knowledge of the subject matter over years of practice so that he/she is competent in that area and can effectively litigate claims when presented with diverse and complicated sets of facts patterns. The Court goes on to state that it would be “counterintuitive to hold that an attorney such as [Mr. M], who has practiced family law his entire legal career, could immediately switch to and successfully practice in another area of the law without serious malpractice concerns.”
The Court determined that Northwestern’s denial of benefits based on its interpretation of the “own occupation” definition was unreasonable and that, “To believe Northwestern’s argument, I would have to disregard: (1) the inherent difficulties involved with practicing law; and (2) [Mr. M]’s physical condition after heart surgery. I will not do so.”
Northwestern also abused its discretion by ignoring the medical evidence
Mr. M’s policy provided that the insured shall receive disability benefits, if disabled, on the 91st day of disability. Northwestern denied his claim stating that he did not qualify for benefits because he was not disabled for the required 90 day period. However, upon review of the administrative record, the Court found that Mr. M attempted to return to work in a limited capacity but that the effects of congestive heart failure prevented him from working and, even in a low stress position, he experienced chest discomfort, tightness and some anxiety. One of Mr. M’s treating physicians stated that, “it does not appear to me that [Mr. M]’s heart has reverted to normal”, and that, “we know that [Mr. M]’s heart is still structurally abnormal”¦”.
A second treating physician initially stated in 2009 that Mr. M was able to return to full-time work. However, that physician subsequently, in 2010, wrote a letter which stated, “[Mr. M] is currently enrolled and taking part in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Due to his commitment to his recovery he is unable to work during his treatment period. Mr. M is due to complete his program June 13, 2010.” Northwestern, in its review of Mr. M’s claim, discounted the subsequent letter from this physician because it contradicted the previous opinion. However, the Court found that the 2010 opinion coincided with the first physician’s opinion, and that “two doctors state that [Mr. M] is not able to return to work.”
The Court ruled that, starting on his date of disability, Mr. M had a physical injury/illness that impaired his ability to perform the material duties of an attorney as it is usually performed in the general economy and that he was disabled for the required 90 day period under the policy. Further, Northwestern’s decision to uphold its denial of Mr. M’s LTD claim was an abuse of discretion and that such decision “does not lie anywhere on the ‘continuum of reasonableness.'” The Court ordered that Northwestern pay the maximum amount of benefits available to Mr. M under the terms of his policy.
Attorneys Dell & Schaefer did not represent Mr. M in his disability claim, appeal or lawsuit. If you have questions regarding your claim for disability benefits, or if your disability claim has been denied, feel free to call Disability Attorneys Dell & Schaefer for a free consultation.
On our website, you can read more about Northwestern Mutual disability claims, user comments and case summaries by clicking here.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Disability Benefit Denial Options
Submit a Strong Northwestern Mutual Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Northwestern Mutual appeal.
Sue Northwestern Mutual
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Northwestern Mutual.
Protect Your Benefits
Get Your Northwestern Mutual Disability Application Approved
We help claimants throughout the entire application process.
Prevent a Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefit Denial
We manage every aspect of your disability claim following claim approval.
Negotiate a Northwestern Mutual Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Northwestern Mutual Reviews
(642)
Policy Holder Rating
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
71%
1
28%
Timely Payments
2.3out of 5
Handling Claim
2.6out of 5
Customer Service
2.0out of 5
Dependable
1.6out of 5
Value
1.9out of 5
Showing 8 of 642 Reviews
Sedgwick
AT&T Was Great and Sedgwick Horrible
My Physician recommended that I take some time from a toxic environment after several deaths in my family coupled with AT&T trying to run tenured employees out of the door... read more >
Northwestern Mutual
Northwestern thinks I can walk even though my left leg is paralyzed
My Northwestern Disability policy has a presumptive total clause which pays lifetime benefits for loss of use of one hand and one foot. They Have claimed I do not fulfill ... read more >
Northwestern Mutual
Northwestern is the Quiet Company that silently screws its policy holders but is too big to fail
I am a board certified cardiologist with severe diabetic comorbidities. I have had occupation specific DI policies with NML since 1980. I am now legally blind, have no fee... read more >
Northwestern Mutual
My claim was handled so unprofessionally – almost no written communication from NW Mutual
While waiting for NW Mutual’s decision on my claim for LTD benefits, I was terminated. The following week, NW Mutual sent me a letter denying my claim. Denial was seemin... read more >
Reply
Northwestern Mutual
NWM refused to have a hematologist review my claim since my "numbers are currently normal." They ignored my primary concern of relapsing
Hi there. I have a chronic autoimmune disease that has temporarily placed me on LTD 5 times over the last 18 years. I currently am in remission although I remain on severa... read more >
Reply
Northwestern Mutual
NW said my relatives' claim was "not justified" and double the premium for no reason
Northwestern claims examiner automatically ruled against my relatives’ claim “not justified.” We had one doctor who told us all he could do for my relatives pain was... read more >
Northwestern Mutual
BAD FAITH
I have two words for each of you: “BAD FAITH”. Sue Northwestern Mutual, ask for a jury trial and let justice prevail. There is no reason why your legitimate claims hav... read more >
Reply
Northwestern Mutual
NML says I have no limitarion and is refusing my benefits
I am a litigation attorney with a paralyzed right vocal cord. My treating physician has placed me on vocal rest and said after the 7 years since my condition I can no long... read more >
Reply
Answered Questions by Our Lawyers
(11)
Showing 8 of 11 Answered Questions
Q: Do you help with negotiating lump sum settlements of policies?
A: Marcella, yes, we do assist in negotiating lump sum settlements of policies. Northwestern Mutual is very selec... Read More >
Q: Are there successful arguments to appeal Northwestern Mutual’s offset of claimant’s LTB by the amount of SSD benefits awarded?
A: Carol, in almost all cases, no. If the policy explicitly allows for the offset, the offset is enforceable. Read More >
Q: Why does Northwestern ask the questions they do in the "Request for Continuation of Disability Benefits" form?
A: Daniel, disability insurers ask these questions in order to obtain information relating to your level of activ... Read More >
Q: What exactly does Northwestern mean by “not gainfully employed in any occupation”?
A: Carol, Gainful work would imply you are performing steady work for payment and getting paid $20 for baby sitti... Read More >
Q: Why is NWM reviewing my claim when my condition hasn't changed? Is it strange that they requested an in-person review?
A: Jim, first and foremost, NWM is one of the most reputable insurance carriers in the industry. Although your co... Read More >
Q: Can I refuse to sign NWM's authoritization form?
A: David, you do have the ability to limit the authority granted, or to refuse it- but you will be responsible fo... Read More >
Q: Can NWM rescind my policy because I forgot to disclose an illness I had 20 years ago (that I no longer have)? Do I have to sign their release to access everything about me?
A: Christine, If you failed to disclose a medical condition on an application to purchase a disability insurance ... Read More >
Q: Can you explain why NWM is still paying me while my claim is being reviewed? They said if they don't approve it, their accomodation payment is not owed back to them.
A: Frustrated, Northwestern Mutual is providing benefits under what is commonly known as a “Reservation of Righ... Read More >
Helpful Videos
(875)
Showing 12 of 875 Videos
Disability Benefit Tips
(330)
Showing 8 of 330 Benefit Tips
Application Tips: Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefits - Top Denial Reasons
Every disability insurance policy is different, and whether your disability insurance claim i... Read More >
Tips to Protect Your Northwestern Mutual Long Term Disability Benefits
Whether you're considering filing a long term disability insurance claim with Northwestern Mutual, have recently received a denial letter, or ... Read More >
What Can I Expect When Seeking Long Term Disability Benefits from Northwestern Mutual?
In this video, disability insurance attorneys Stephen Jessup and Gregory Dell discuss multipl... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
If you're seeking long term disability benefits from an insurance company, you may be concern... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
When you're seeking disability benefits under a long term disability policy, your medical rec... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
One thing many long term disability claimants don't know about (or expect) from the claims re... Read More >
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Getting a denial letter from your disability insurance company is one of the ultimate insults... Read More >
Disability Denial Reason #2 - Change of Disability Definition & Vocational Review
One of the top reasons for terminating a claimant's long term disability benefits involves th... Read More >
Dell Disability Cases
(375)
Showing 8 of 375 Dell Disability Cases
Northwestern Mutual Approves Claim For Disability Benefits
Prior to contacting our office, our client was having little success in securing his disability insurance benefits under his privately purchas... Read More >
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, NWM overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for California Customer Relations Supervisor
Our client, Ms. D, formerly worked as a Customer relations Supervisor in at an Institutional Investments firm. In February 2014 a number of me... Read More >
Northwestern Mutual Reinstates Disability Benefits to Attorney Suffering From Gastrointestinal Problems
Prior to filing for long term disability benefits under her private individual disability policy with Northwestern Mutual due to severe gastro... Read More >
Northwestern Mutual Approves Long Term Disability Insurance Benefits for Veterinarian
Our client was a long time Emergency Room Veterinarian whose job was far from what most envision when thinking of a Veterinarian. Unlike your ... Read More >
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Long Term Disability Benefits
Our client was employed with the State of Oregon as a Technical Support Representative. She ... Read More >
Sun Life Wrongfully Denies Disability After Paying For 23 Months
We represent a 57 year-old claimant who’s occupation was selling commercial vehicles for ma... Read More >
Nurse Denied Long-term Disability Benefits by Lincoln After the Definition of Disability Changed
Our client, a registered nurse for Dignity Health, found herself in a difficult situation aft... Read More >
Lincoln Reverses Decision to Terminate LTD Benefits of Corporate Attorney after Dell Disability Lawyers Appeals the Decision
The claimant is an 64 year old former Corporate Attorney and at a prominent Florida business ... Read More >
Disability Lawsuit Stories
(765)
Reviews from Our Clients
