NY Life Disability Benefits Reinstated on Appeal Despite Independent Medical Examination
Our client, a former high level medical sales representative, suffered from chronic pain stemming from his neck, back and hip that would eventually result in multiple surgeries to include lumbar fusion, cervical fusion and sacroiliac joint fusion. He initially filed his claim for disability benefits at age 62 due to the increasing pain he was experiencing, which made it exceedingly difficult to continue his work as an outside medical device salesman covering a multi-state area. In December of 2018, he filed his claim for short term disability benefits with Cigna, which were approved and then successfully transitioned into long term disability in June 2019. Shortly thereafter, in February of 2020, he was advised his claim for disability benefits had also been approved by the Social Security Administration.
Like the majority of employer provided disability policies, his employer’s long term disability policy contained a 24 month “regular occupation” definition of disability, which means that for the first 24 months of long term disability he would be deemed disabled if he was unable to perform the material duties of his pre-disability occupation, which Cigna had determined to be a “light” duty occupation in the national economy. After the initial 24 months of long term disability the definition of disability changes to mean the inability to perform the material duties of any occupation based on his training, education and experience.
Any Occupation Definition of Disability Review
While on claim, Cigna was purchased by NY Life and became responsible for the handling and payment of his claim. Six months prior to the transition from the “regular” to “any” occupation change in definition of disability NY Life advised our client that it was beginning its review as to his continued entitlement to benefits. In doing so, NY Life had his file reviewed by an internal nurse case manager, an in-house medical director, as well as sent him for an Independent Medical Examination (IME). The IME doctor determined that despite the fact our client was age 64, had three major surgeries, positive findings on examination and diagnostic medical evidence such as MRIs, that he would be capable of performing at a Sedentary demand level on a full time basis. NY Life took the IME doctor’s opinion, in conjunction with the opinions of its in-house medical personnel and had a vocational analysis performed, which identified two “sedentary” occupations that it felt our client could do. Based on the preceding, two months prior to the actual change in definition, NY Life advised him that his claim was being terminated at the 24 month change in definition as NY Life had determined he was no longer disabled under the terms of the policy.
Appeal of NY LIFE LTD Denial
Following the denial of his claim, our client contacted our office seeking representation for purposes of filing his appeal. Review of the claim file provided by NY Life, with specific attention to the IME report, indicated that NY Life’s reliance on the report was not well founded, as the opinions provided by the IME doctor actually indicated that our client would not be capable of the full gamut of Sedentary work duties. Furthermore, the IME report was silent as to any actual functional physical testing performed. As such, we arranged for our client to undergo a Functional Capacity Examination (FCE) to properly document our client’s physical restrictions and limitations considering Department of Labor standards. The testing documented that our client had multiple restrictions and limitations of across a gamut of testing parameters that resulted in him having No Safe Capacity for Work. Upon receipt of the FCE findings we reached out to two of our client’s doctors to complete customized attending physician’s statements that were drafted based on their prior opinions, the findings of the FCE, as well as to further address the comments of NY Life’s reviewing doctors.
After the filing of the appeal, and prior to the expiration of the 45-day review period, NY Life notified our office that it would be exercising its right to a 45-day extension as it was still performing medical and vocational reviews. During the extension period NY Life provided “form” letter that contained updates regarding the review of the claim. One such letter close to the expiration of the extension period advised our office a decision should be rendered within 30 days. Following the expiration of the 45-day extension and without any response from NY Life as to our requests for an update on the appeal, we filed a federal lawsuit under ERISA based on the denial of benefits and NY Life’s failure to provide a timely review of the claim. In doing so we ensured that important legal rights for our client would be preserved and act as potential leverage against NY Life during the review process.
Within three weeks of filing the lawsuit we received word form NY Life that it was overturning the denial of benefits and reinstating our clients claim for benefits. We continue to represent our client to ensure that the remainder of his benefit will be protected. Although our client only has a short amount of time left on claim given his age the denial of his benefit at age 64 is evidence that NY Life will not hesitate in denying a claim for benefits if it believes it has reasonable grounds to.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong New York Life Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong New York Life appeal.
Sue New York Life
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against New York Life.
Get Your New York Life Disability Application Approved
Prevent a New York Life Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a New York Life Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.