Court Orders United of Omaha to Pay Death Benefit, Attorney's Fees and Prejudgment Interest
In Brown v. United of Omaha Life Insurance, United unsuccessfully tried to avoid paying a death benefit to Lloyd Brown III, the beneficiary of a life insurance policy chosen by his father, Lloyd Brown II. Ultimately, Brown III won, but the case was remanded to the district court to determine the exact monetary amount of his award as well as the amount of attorney’s fees and prejudgment interested to which Brown III was also entitled.
Overview of Facts
It all started in December 2011, when Lloyd Brown II, a truck driver for West Side Transport Inc., submitted a “Benefit Election Authorization” for life insurance offered by his employer through Hartford Insurance Company. The effective date of the policy was February 1, 2012. West Side terminated its relationship with Hartford effective January 31, 2012, and offered optional life insurance to its employees through United of Omaha Life Insurance.
Beginning on February 1, 2012, West Side began deducting an amount from Brown II’s paycheck that would pay for $30,000 worth of life insurance. From March 21, 2012, until Brown II’s death in November 2012, an amount was deducted from his paycheck which was equivalent to a $181,666.67 death benefit. Following his father’s death, Brown III submitted a claim for the death benefit, which United denied on two grounds:
1) United agreed to take over policies in effect as of January 31, 2012. Although Brown II had applied for the guaranteed issue policy in December 2011, the effective date was February 1, 2012. Therefore, Brown II did not have coverage since he had not submitted evidence of insurability as required by policies issued after United took over.
2) Even if Brown II had coverage, it was limited to $30,000 since the record did not show that he ever made a formal request for an increased death benefit.
Brown III exhausted his administrative remedies and then filed this ERISA lawsuit. His motion for summary judgment was granted by an Ohio District Court and United appealed. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court decision in favor of Brown III, but remanded for further proceedings.
Brown II Was Not Required to Submit Evidence of Insurability
United argued that in December 2011, when Brown II applied for life insurance through Hartford, it was guarantee issue and the plan did not require evidence of insurability. Since Brown II’s policy did not take effect until February 1, 2012, after United took over as the insurer and required evidence of insurability, something Brown II did not provide, he did not qualify for a death benefit.
The Court conducted a comprehensive analysis of the policy language and held that it was clear that an employee who “elected” insurance under the prior plan was not required to submit evidence of insurability. Since Brown II “selected,” which is the same as “elected,” insurance under the prior plan, United was bound by the plain language of the term “elected” and Brown III was entitled to collect the death benefit under Brown II’s policy.
Appellate Court Agrees Brown III is Entitled to a Minimum of $150,000 and Remands for Determination of Accurate Amount
United argued that even if there was coverage, it was limited to $30,000 since there was no evidence that Brown II had ever requested an increase in coverage. Brown II presented evidence that the death benefit amount withheld from Brown II’s wages increased from approximately $4.00 a month to $122.81 a month. Brown II would have objected to that withholding amount if it was incorrect. The Court agreed, but remanded for a determination of the accurate amount.
Remand for Amount Determinations
According to the terms of the policy, the death benefit would be $150,000 or five times Brown II’s annual salary, which ever amount was less. The appellate Court remanded for a determination of the proper amount of the death benefit and also for a determination of the amount of attorney’s fees to which Brown III was entitled.
This case was not handled by our office, but can be instructive for those struggling to obtain a death benefit after a loved one dies. For questions about this or any other question about death or disability benefits, contact one of our disability attorneys at Dell & Schaefer for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Mutual of Omaha Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Mutual of Omaha Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Mutual of Omaha Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
I do not understand how a “medical review team” who has never laid eyes on my wife can say she is able to return to work when her doctors who see her on a regular basis have documented that she can't
I would encourage anyone who has problems with Mutual of Omaha or United of Omaha to immediately contact an attorney.
Q: Can MOO deny my claim on the basis of preexisting condition when my condition is not preexisting?
Q: Am I able to work part time at a different job that is nothing like the one I was at when I was injured?
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, Mutual of Omaha overturned previous denial of short term disability benefits for Maine Senior Software Engineer
After an appeal, a former Director of Information Security, gets disability benefits approved for mental health disorder. The fight for long term disability benefits for client’s physical limitations continues
United of Omaha overturns decision to deny benefits to disabled Quality Assurance Manager after Appeal discredits its medical review and vocational assessment
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, Mutual of Omaha overturned its previous denial of short term disability benefits for Colorado Senior Manager
Mutual of Omaha Reinstates Benefits of Business Development Manager after Appealing the Termination of Her LTD Benefits
Mutual of Omaha Approves Dell Disability Lawyers Client for Short Term Disability Benefits After Administrative Appeal
Mutual Of Omaha Overturns Denial of Short Term Disability Benefits for Software Developer With Chronic Back Pain
United of Omaha criticized for relying on in-house medical review and failing to obtain independent examinations
Court overturns United of Omaha's termination of Plaintiff's benefits after performing an unfair "any occupation" review
Registered Nurse Disabled By Plantar Fascitis Wins Long-term Disability Lawsuit Against United of Omaha After Judge Finds Evidence of "Cherry Picking"
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.