United of Omaha Overturns Decision to Deny Benefits to Disabled Quality Assurance Manager After Appeal Discredits Its Medical Review and Vocational Assessment

In 2016, Cathy, a Quality Assurance Manager for a medical device company, sought surgery for a tear in her right rotator cuff. Cathy fully expected to heal, recover and return to work. However, disappointingly, things did not turn out quite like she expected. After continuing to experience pain, discomfort and restriction in her right shoulder range of motion, she discovered that her shoulder did not heal properly following her surgery. Five months after her original surgery, Cathy had her second right shoulder surgery. Unfortunately the second surgery did not resolve her issues and she further developed adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder.

During this time Cathy had remained out of work on medical leave and had filed disability claims under her employer provided long term disability insurance through United of Omaha Life Insurance Company a/k/a Mutual of Omaha. United reviewed and approved her disability claims, first paying her short-term disability benefits, and then approving her claim for long-term disability.

In early 2017 Mutual of Omaha decided to conduct a medical review of Cathy’s claim and requested updated medical records from her surgeon and other treating physicians. Mutual of Omaha then sent the records and file to its nurse consultant and its vocational consultant for review.

After completing their reviews, both the nurse consultant and vocational consultant concluded that Cathy had some restrictions, however, that they believed that her physical functional abilities exceeded what she claimed her restrictions and limitations to be, and that she could perform her occupational duties as a Quality Assurance Manager. Upon receiving the reports from its nurse and vocational consultants Mutual of Omaha notified Cathy that it was terminating her long-term disability claim. It further informed her that she could appeal the decision in writing within 180 days.

Cathy spent the next three months contemplating what to do next. With three months remaining in her appeal period she contacted Attorneys Dell & Schaefer and hired Attorney Cesar Gavidia to represent her. With limited time to submit a proper and exhaustive appeal, Attorney Gavidia and his team immediately got to work by requesting Cathy’s complete claim file which contained all of the records, notes and documentation that Mutual of Omaha used to arrive at its decision. Also, all of Cathy’s medical records were obtained from her medical providers and a medical review was conducted.

In his review of the case, Attorney Gavidia discovered that the nurse consultant’s medical review was flawed and failed to support a reasonable basis for Mutual of Omaha to terminate Cathy’s claim. On Appeal, Attorney Gavidia argued that Cathy’s range of motion, as reported by her doctors and the medical evidence, was significantly more restricted than the nurse consultant’s review depicted, and thus the nurse consultant misrepresented the extent of Cathy’s physical limitations. In addition, Attorney Gavidia argued that the nurse consultant’s opinions were invalid on account of the fact she failed to hold any specialization or credentialing in the areas of orthopedic medicine, neurology or physical medicine. The obvious question being, how could a nurse, with no medical specialization in these areas, possibly supersede the opinions of board certified physicians specialized in the appropriate areas of medicine.

It was also discovered that the occupational analysis conducted by the vocational consultant was invalid since it failed to consider any of the duties pertaining to Cathy’s occupation and simply arbitrarily reduced her occupation as a Quality Assurance Manager to a simple physical “light level” demand category.

Despite having only three months to compile all of the relevant records and evidence necessary to submit with Cathy’s Appeal, Attorney Gavidia and his Appeal Team at Dell & Schaefer were able to make a timely submission.

Approximately two months after the Appeal was submitted Mutual of Omaha notified that it was exercising its right under ERISA to an extension of additional time to review the Appeal. Approximately two months later Mutual of Omaha communicated that it was overturning its decision, paying all back benefits owed and reinstating Cathy’s long-term disability claim.

Cathy has once again begun receiving long-term disability benefits and Attorney Gavidia and his team continue to represent Cathy and assist in her submission of monthly proof of loss to Mutual of Omaha.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

FAQ

Do you help Mutual Of Omaha claimants nationwide?

We represent Mutual Of Omaha clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Mutual Of Omaha disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Mutual Of Omaha. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Mutual Of Omaha.

How do you help Mutual Of Omaha claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Mutual Of Omaha long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Mutual Of Omaha:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Michael P. (Michigan)

I had a very good experience. Rachel and Danielle were incredibly professional. They gave me a clear understanding of the process and timelines. I feel they are there fighting for me everyday. The process overall was very simple and enabled me to focus on my illness.

Read 426 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us