Texas Judge Rules No New Medical Evidence Allowed Post ERISA Disability Appeal

In Hutchings v. Lora Lyons, Plan Administrator, and Ball Industries Employee Injury Benefit Plan, et al. (Defendants), plaintiff Linda Hutchings injured her knee while at work. Her initial request for disability benefits was granted so she could have surgery for a torn right medial meniscus. The surgery was not successful.

Just a few months later, she requested disability benefits so she could have a total knee replacement surgery and her request was denied. Defendants claimed it was a preexisting condition. Hutchings’ administrative appeal was denied and she subsequently filed this ERISA lawsuit. She filed the administrative record at the same time.

A week later, defendants filed additional attachments, including an eight-page report by a medical doctor who had reviewed the plaintiff’s medical records. Plaintiff moved to strike the report since she had never seen it before and it was not part of the administrative record. Defendants objected, claiming the report would be helpful to the Court since it “synthesized” hundreds of pages of medical records.

The Court decided in favor of the plaintiff and held the new report was inadmissible. Plaintiff had never had an opportunity to rebut its contents and it did not fall under any exception to the rule that no new evidence can be submitted after the administrative appeal is finished.

The Medical Report Did Not Fit Under Either of the Two Exceptions That Allow a Court to Consider Evidence Outside the Administrative Record

The District court relied on Fifth Circuit precedent that makes it clear that “when assessing factual questions, the district court is constrained to the evidence before the plan administrator.” There are two exceptions to this rule:

1. Evidence that shows how an administrator has interpreted the terms of the plan in other similar cases.

2. The evidence assists the court “in understanding the medical terminology or practice related to a claim.”

Defendants argued the evidence fell into the second exception and would assist the court in understanding the medical terminology or practice. The court disagreed.

The Medical Report is Not One That Assists the Court in Understanding Medical Terminology

The court noted its job is “to review the record as the Administrator had it when she denied the claim.” It was undisputed that this report was generated nearly a year after the defendants had denied plaintiff’s claim. There was nothing purported to be in the report that would aid the court in understanding medical terminology or practice, but was only a “synthesized” version of her medical records. Accordingly, the court held that its admission would be only “cumulative and unnecessary.”

Plaintiff Did Not Waive her Right to Object

Defendants then argued that Hutchings waited too long to object to the inclusion of the report in the file. The court disagreed with this argument, noting the report was filed nearly a year after the denial of Hutchings’ “employee injury claim.” She made her objection approximately 10 weeks after the 1,000 plus pages of her administrative record was filed with the court, which was a reasonable period. Accordingly, the court deemed her objection was timely and the report was “not properly before the court.” The report was stricken from the administrative record.

This case was not handled by our office, but we believe it can be instructive to those who may be faced with a similar situation. If you have questions about this case, or any question concerning our disability benefits, contact us at Dell & Schaefer for a free consultation.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

Leave a comment or ask us a question

FAQ

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews   *****

Julia R.

Being very ill is extremely difficult for anyone to deal with. But trying to focus on health issues while navigating all of the complexities of STD and LTD really makes a bad situation worse and more stressful. I spoke with many lawyers before I was connected with Dell & Schaefer and they were the first and only ones to take the time to truly listen to my history and make the sincere effort to understand my situation. After that, they – specifically Rachel Alters and her brilliant team of professionals – did everything they could to support and champion my case – from dealing with insurance companies to speaking with my doctors.

Rachel and her colleagues helped me when I most needed help and continue to check in on me which is wonderful. As their client, you are not just a numbered file – you really are treated as a person who matters and their care, concern and consistent follow-up has made this challenging period in my life much, much easier.

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us