A private disability policy is one that is not governed by ERISA, because you either bought the policy on your own or you purchased the policy through your membership in association. If you have a private disability policy, then you have significant options available in the event your claim has been denied. Long term disability insurance denials are the kind of claims that can spiral out of control if not handled properly. Our disability attorneys have litigated against every major disability insurance company and have established a reputation for having what it takes to efficiently handle a disability denial yet we will take a case to trial if necessary. Our lawyers have been successful at obtaining hundreds of millions of dollars in long term disability benefits for our clients. We always attempt to use our well established relationships with the disability insurance companies to reach a resolution without the need to go through extensive litigation and trial. We only accept private claim denials on a contingency fee basis, which means we do not charge any fees or costs unless we are able to recover benefits. Our video above discusses available options for a private disability denial and our experience in handling these long term disability denials.
Our Extensive Disability Litigation Experience
We are not personal injury or social security lawyers that handle the occasional disability insurance claim. We are a team of ten attorneys and twenty-five staff that exclusively handle disability insurance claims nationwide. Each year we review hundreds of private disability benefit denials and only accept cases in which we believe we can achieve our client’s litigation goals. In the past 20 years, we don’t think there is another law firm that has handled more private disability denials nationwide than our law firm. Please select a disability company below for more information about your specific disability insurance company.
DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews
View videos, articles, resolved cases and claimant reviews about your specific disability insurance company.
We are one of the few law firms in the entire country that has taken a long term disability denial to trial. We have reviewed thousands of pages of internal company documents and taken depositions of claims examiners at almost every disability company in order to gain inside knowledge of these companies training manuals, claim handling techniques and internal operations. This is important because every disability insurance company understands our law firm’s legal capabilities and that tends to make the litigation process smoother and quicker for our clients. Disability denials often create financial hardships and we understand the importance of trying to get a disputed claim resolved in an expedient manner.
Depositions In Disability Litigation
Denial of Benefits With No Understanding of Occupation!
Doctor Refuses to Admit Claimant Has a Disability
When considering a law firm to your handle your private disability denial it is often difficult for a claimant to actually see how a lawyer performs in litigation or trial. In order to give potential clients confidence in our lawyers abilities we started publishing educational disability videos in 2010. We have produced over 400 disability insurance videos, but two of our favorite videos posted below are from video depositions we took of a claim manager at UNUM and a doctor that was hired by Metlife to support a claim denial.
We are always asked about our experience in representing individuals in specific occupations. When it comes to private disability denial claims the majority of our clients have been doctors, lawyers, dentist, chiropractors, business owners, high level executives, financial advisors, accountants, consultants and professional athletes. You can get a good understanding of the clients we have helped by reviewing our hundreds of client reviews and resolved case summaries. We also have client references available upon your request.
Private Disability Claim Denial Options
When an individual buys a disability income policy from an insurance company, the individual and the insurance company enter into a signed contractual agreement. If an individual is disabled according to the terms of the disability income policy, the carrier must pay the claim. A long term disability insurance denial is a breach of contract. If a disability insurance company has denied benefits to an insured, there may be multiple causes of action that can be alleged in a lawsuit against the insurance company. Each state has different laws and it is possible that some of the causes of action listed below may not be viable in the state where a claimant’s lawsuit must be filed. Attorneys Dell Schaefer has filed lawsuits against disability insurance companies in both state and federal courts throughout the country.
Breach Of Contract
The most common reason for denial of an insured’s claim for benefits is that the insurer has rendered an opinion that the insured is not "disabled” as defined by the subject disability policy. If the insured has been wrongfully denied benefits, the legal cause of action that may be filed against the insured is a first party breach of contract action. Similar to most first-party insurance cases involving a denial of benefits by an insurer, disability insurers are subject to actions for breach of contract. In order to prevail in an action for breach of a disability insurance contract the insured must prove the traditional common law elements for breach of contract:
existence of a contract;
a breach of the contract;
damages resulting from the breach.
Additionally, in most cases, the burden of proof is on the insured to show:
that he or she was regularly engaged in an occupation at the time of their disability;
that he or she is disabled (either totally or partially);
he or she is under the reasonable care of a physician qualified to treat them for their disabling condition.
Any lawsuit filed for breach of contract must have a copy of the disputed disability policy attached as an exhibit to the complaint. Most disability breach of contract actions involve questions of facts for the jury, therefore it is appropriate to demand a trial by jury in the complaint.
Breach Of Implied Covenant Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing
Every contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and enforcement. Under the law of most states, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a part of every contract. Asserting a claim of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is often raised in first party disability insurance actions. Some insurance companies will move to strike an allegation of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing on the basis that it is nothing more than a bad-faith claim in disguise. However, there is a clear distinction between an action for bad faith and alleging that the insurance carrier breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
There are several important points that must be understood to properly allege breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It is important to note, that no independent cause of action exists for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. "Where a party to a contract has in good faith performed the express terms of the contract an action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing will not lie.” [A] claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot be maintained without identifying express contractual provisions that have been breached. In addition, the allegations pleading breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing should not be redundant where the conduct which forms the alleged violation is duplicative of the companion cause of action.
The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is limited in two ways: first, the claim must be accompanied by an allegation that an express term of the contract has been breached; and the implied obligation of good faith cannot be used to vary the terms of an express contract. Hence, to establish this cause of action, a plaintiff "must demonstrate a failure or refusal to discharge contractual responsibilities, prompted… by a conscious and deliberate act, which unfairly frustrates the agreed common purpose and disappoints the reasonable expectations of the other party, thereby depriving that party of the benefits of the agreement." Generally, the courts have been split on allowing the insured to plead breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Fraud: Intentional Or Negligent Misrepresentation
An insured can plead an action for intentional misrepresentation against the disability insurer. In order to succeed in a claim for fraud or intentional misrepresentation against the disability insurer and/or the insurance agent, the insured must prove: "(1) a misrepresentation of a material fact; (2) which the person making the representation knew to be false; (3) that the misrepresentation was made with the purpose of inducing another person to rely upon it; (4) that the person relied on the misrepresentation to his detriment; and (5) that this reliance caused damages.” An allegation of fraud must be made with particularity. Where fraudulent misrepresentations were made by an agent of the insurer, both the agent and the insurer are liable. Furthermore, the insurer is estopped to deny coverage in accordance with the misrepresentations.
An insured or insurance company may also plead negligent misrepresentation. In order to succeed, the plaintiff must prove that: "(1) the defendant made a misrepresentation of material fact that he believed to be true but which was in fact false; (2) the defendant was negligent in making the statement because he should have known the representation was false; (3) the defendant intended to induce the plaintiff to rely… on the misrepresentation; and (4) injury resulted to the plaintiff acting in justifiable reliance upon the misrepresentation."
Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress
"A cause of action for ‘intentional infliction of severe mental or emotional distress,’ more appropriately called ‘outrageous conduct causing severe emotional distress,’ essentially involves the deliberate or reckless infliction of mental suffering on another, even if unconnected to any other actionable wrong.” An insurer need not intend to cause emotional distress to be subject to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress; it need only be shown that the insurer "intended [its] specific behavior and knew or should have known that the distress would follow."
Fraudulent misrepresentations by the insurer or its agents can give rise to a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, as can the denial, delay and interference with medical treatment and the claims process. The key is that the conduct, when "[m]easured by the standards of human decency and societal expectations," would cause one to be outraged.
Breach Of Fiduciary Duty: Misrepresentations By Insurance Broker Or Agent
Under the law of most states, an insurance broker is in a fiduciary relationship with an insured. An insured may bring an action against his/her agent whose negligence causes the insured to become embroiled in litigation to secure coverage and incur attorney’s fees and costs.
Declaratory Judgment: Clarifying Policy Terms
In the disability insurance arena declaratory judgment actions are most often plead to clarify ambiguous terms in the disability insurance policy. "Questions of fact and disagreements concerning coverage under insurance policies are proper subjects for a declaratory judgment if necessary to construction of parties’ legal rights." "Generally, declaratory relief is not available to settle factual issues upon which coverage questions turn under an insurance contract which is clear and unambiguous, because such instances present no need for contract construction or interpretation." Actions for declaratory judgment are appropriate when the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of rights. "To state a cause of action for declaratory relief, a complaint must allege that there is a bona fide dispute between the parties and that the moving party has a justifiable question as to the existence or non-existence of some right, status, immunity, power or privilege, or as to some fact upon which the existence of such right, status, immunity, power or privilege does or may depend, that plaintiff is in doubt as to the right, status, immunity, power or privilege, and that there is a bona fide, actual, present need for the declaration."
Some disability benefit denials do not require the filing of a lawsuit against the insurance company. In many cases our law firm will open the lines of communication with the disability insurance company and have a disability claim denial re-evaluated. Additionally, we can submit a detailed demand letter / appeal in response to the disability denial letter, which addresses the medical and legal issues and strengths of your claim, thereby giving the insurance company a last chance to pay disability benefits prior to the filing of a lawsuit. A disability denial letter must clarify all of the reasons that an individual disability claim has been denied.
In some cases we are able to mediate and meet with the insurance company prior to filing a lawsuit in order to reverse a disability claim denial without the need to file a lawsuit. These mediations take place at our office or a mutual location that is acceptable to our client. We participate is mediations throughout the country. In many cases a pre-suit mediation is a good alternative as it eliminates 18-36 months of wasteful litigation.
If our investigation of a long-term disability insurance denial reveals that the insurance company did not have a good faith basis for the LTD denial of our client’s claim, we will file a written complaint with the appropriate State Department of Insurance and Department of Finance. This action is required in most states in order to preserve a claim for bad-faith. Not every state allows a claim for bad-faith. Please watch our video below to learn about a bad faith claim for extra contractual benefits or go here for additional bad faith denial lawsuit information.
Bad Faith Disability Denials
Disability Class Action Lawsuits
In unique situations a disability class action lawsuit may be an option to pursue. Class actions in the disability insurance industry are unique because there must be a harm being caused that is universally affecting all class members the same. Most people that have a disability insurance claim are seeking individual disability benefits and a class action would not be the appropriate cause of action. Learn more about disability benefit class action lawsuits.
Do you work in my state?
Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.
What are your fees?
Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.
The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.
In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.
Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?
No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.
How can I contact you?
When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.
Bruce R. (Arizona)
Steve Dell has done an exceptional job with my disability application process. The firm is extremely well managed. They have acquired an incredible amount of experience over many years. I recommend them for disability insurance claims without reservation.
I called this firm a few months ago completely disparaged due to a company cutting off disability benefits at a time that nearly caused me to lose everything.
Attorney Alex Palmera and Danielle worked hard to reach an amicable settlement and my case was settled a few months later. This is a good firm and the specific expertise in disability claims saved me countless hours of hassle at a time when an already fragile state existed.
Thank you Mr. Palamara and Danielle.
Sandra B. (Arkansas)
I have nothing but good things to say about how my buyout was handled with my disability claim. The level of professionalism was amazing. All of my questions and concerns were answered either by Danielle L. or Alex P. in such a timely manner and with such care I would recommend them in a heartbeat to anyone needing to approach their provider with buyout options.
They did a fantastic job communicating between the provider and me, always keeping my best interest at heart and always answering my many many questions. They really did take most of the stress out of this whole situation. I would give them a 10 out of 10 for every step of this crazy journey. Thank you so much for helping me through this.
Brenda R. (New York)
I needed assistance with an appeal for a LTD claim that was initially denied. Stephen understood what needed to happen to win the appeal and he did win the appeal for me.
Michael C. (Virginia)
Greg Dell and his assistant Anneli have been extremely responsive and helpful, not only our initial consultations, but in follow-ups 1 and 2 years later with the insurance company to ensure that they comply with their agreements (which they did), as well as a separate and only slightly-related inquiry about our health insurance. I always hear back from them very quickly, which is rare and greatly appreciated.
Jeff P. (Oklahoma)
After a very long and frustrating ordeal to keep my LTD payments coming I decided to seek assistance from and attorney. After much research and asking those in the legal profession Dell & Schaefer seemed to be the top choice. I reached out and Alex Palamara was the attorney assigned to my case. All I can say is the experience was outstanding. Both Alex and his Paralegal, Danielle Lauria were excellent to work with. They were very kind, concerned, understanding of my frustrations and treated me with the utmost respect. Communication was excellent with regular updates and telling me what I could expect in each stage of the process.
Alex was also very straight forward with what to expect and no pie in the sky promises or expectations were made. In the end we won our case and I believe it was solely due to their experience and knowledge of not only the laws but the insurance companies as a whole. I would highly recommend them and am very grateful for the help they afforded to me.
Chad B. (Illinois)
I originally spoke with 3 other long term disability lawyers about my case before contacting Dell and Schaefer. None of those law firms would take it. They said the chances of me winning was not good. After finding Dell and Schaefer online I spoke with one of the attorneys that has since left. He did take my case but later it was picked up by Rachel Alters. Rachel is amazing and a very intelligent attorney. She not only won my case but also was able to get my back pay for 6 months.
I also cannot say enough about Sonia Nogueira. Sonia was always quick to answer any of my questions. I would usually hear back from her within hours of sending her a email. I do not know where I would be if I hadn’t contacted them. My family and I cannot thank them enough. Don’t let an insurance company tell you they are not responsible for paying you. I paid them for 20 years monthly and they looked for any reason they could not to have to pay me when I needed my benefit. Thank you Rachel and Sonia for all you guys do.