• Nurse Wins Lawsuit Against United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyNurse Wins Lawsuit Against United of Omaha Life Insurance Company

Registered Nurse Disabled By Plantar Fascitis Wins Long-term Disability Lawsuit Against United of Omaha Life Insurance Company After Judge Finds Evidence of “Cherry Picking”

From 2002 until 2010, Julia Sun worked as a Registered Nurse caring for quadriplegic patients. Her occupation could not be considered, as far as strength demand was concerned, anything less than a “medium” physical demand level occupation. The substantial and material duties of her occupation included caring, bathing, feeding, dressing and transferring patients. She administered their medications and assessed their condition and illnesses. There was no question that her job was selfless, difficult and required unique skills as well the significant physical ability.

In December 2010, Ms. Sun suffered an injury to her foot. On the advice of her treating physician she took time off of work to focus on recovery and healing. However, her foot never properly healed and she was never able to return to work. Ms. Sun’s treating podiatric physician diagnosed her with plantar fasciitis and possible Peroneal Longus tear. To make matters worse, Ms. Sun did not undergo surgery due to her existing diagnosis of lupus and the medications she was taking to treat her autoimmune disorder.

Approximately 4 months after she stopped working United of Omaha began paying Ms. Sun long-term disability benefits pursuant to her employer sponsored and ERISA governed long-term disability plan.

In February 2012, United requested that Ms. Sun complete an Education, Training and Work Experience Form. Ms. Sun completed and returned the form to United, and indicated that her employment goal was to “[r]eturn to work as an RN in a non-patient care role. Approximately 5 months later United terminated Ms. Sun’s long-term disability claim. Ms. Sun appealed United’s adverse decision submitting additional evidence of disability. Ms. Sun prevailed in her appeal and once again began receiving LTD benefits from United.

United Terminates Sun’s Long-term Disability Claim Following Change In Occupational Definition

After being paid and receiving benefits for 24 months under the Own Occupation definition of the disability and even paying some months beyond that time, United notified Sun that the question of disability was no longer whether she was capable of performing the duties of her own occupation as a registered nurse, but rather that after 24 months the question of disability was now whether Sun was capable of performing all of the material duties of Any Gainful Occupation. United informed Sun that it had determined that she was not disabled from Any Gainful Occupation and that it had decided to terminate her claim for benefits.

As its basis for denial, United stated that it had referred Sun’s case to a medical consultant who reviewed her medical file and determined that although she would continue to have restrictions, those restrictions only included no heavy lifting, pushing, pulling and carrying over 10 pounds, no prolonged standing, walking, climbing, squatting, crawling and kneeling. United also performed a Transferable Skills Analysis (“TSA”) using the information provided regarding Ms. Sun’s education, training and work experience. United concluded that Ms. Sun had the transferable skills necessary to perform a Gainful Occupation of a sedentary strength demand.

Ms. Sun appealed United’s adverse decision within the 180 day timeframe provided for in the denial letter to only have United disregard the additional arguments and medical evidence she submitted and uphold its previous decision.

Ms. Sun filed a lawsuit to recover her long-term disability benefits in the United District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking her unpaid benefits, costs, attorney fees and interest.

US District Court Finds That United Acted Arbitrarily and Capriciously By “Cherry-Picking” The Opinion of Its Medical Consultant

After suit was filed, both Ms. Sun and United submitted motions for summary judgment requesting the court to find in their favor. United also filed a counter-claim requesting that any benefits that Ms. Sun was overpaid on account of her receiving social security disability benefit be paid to United.

After the parties briefed their cases to the judge through motions for summary judgment, the Court found that Ms. Sun was indeed disabled and entitled to benefits and that United had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying her claim. The Court found that the “administrative record does not support United’s findings that Sun can perform sedentary work and is not disabled.” Further, the judge specifically identifies that United not only ignored findings by Ms. Sun’s treating physicians that showed Ms. Sun was indeed disabled, but also “cherry-picked” the opinions of its vocational consultant to “find evidence that supports a conclusion in their favor.”

After finding in Ms. Sun’s favor, the Court required United to pay Ms. Sun the benefits that were owed to her, less the amount that Ms. Sun owed United on account of the overpayment of benefits, and directed the parties to attempt to stipulate to a judgment amount for attorney fees, cost and interest.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

Leave a comment or ask us a question

FAQ

Do you help Mutual Of Omaha claimants nationwide?

We represent Mutual Of Omaha clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Mutual Of Omaha disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Mutual Of Omaha. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Mutual Of Omaha.

How do you help Mutual Of Omaha claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Mutual Of Omaha long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Mutual Of Omaha:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews   *****

Kevin M.

I worked with Steve Dell. I had two disability policies and both claims went as smoothly as possible. The key? Adequate preparation by the disability attorney. Believe me, I am an educated man, but unless one has experience in the field, you will make mistakes on your own (just like anything else in life). Some of these mistakes could cost you your claim. Trust me, hiring a disability attorney will be one of the wisest investments you will make.

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us