Prudential terminates disability benefits of traumatic brain injury claimant in a case of mistaken identity

James H. White filed a lawsuit against Prudential Insurance of America in the United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the insurer’s termination of White’s disability benefits after paying him disability benefits for twenty-four (24) months. Claiming that White’s disability was the product of a pre-existing metal illness, Prudential Insurance terminated White’s disability benefits because his policy with Prudential only allows 24 months of disability benefits when the disabling condition is related to a mental illness.

White sustained permanent brain injuries in a serious motor vehicle accident on April 21, 2007. His brain injury resulted in White having cognitive losses, which entitled him to long term disability benefits for sixty (60) months. At first, Prudential denied White his disability benefits, stating White did not qualify for benefits, only to later determine that White had indeed suffered a disabling brain injury, and subsequently, awarded White long term disability. So far, so good.

Medical Records Of Claimant Are Mixed Up With Those Of An Individual With The Same Name

A mix-up of medical records with another James White resulted in the James White of this lawsuit being denied his long term benefits because of the other James White’s mental condition. Mistakenly, Prudential terminated White’s disability benefits because the insurer had been provided with another James White’s medical records that documented a mental illness that predated April 21, 2007. The Plaintiff in the subject case not only has never suffered from a mental illness, but does not even slightly resemble physically or personality-wise the James White who does suffer from a mental illness. In fact, one of Prudential’s insurance reviewers noted this discrepancy to no avail.

On June 23, 2010, the plaintiff appealed the Prudential’s termination of his disability benefits and provided Prudential with statements from the facility and the office manager of the neurologist that mixed up the medical records of the two James Whites. In addition, the plaintiff submitted documentation from his physicians confirming that White’s disability from his job as Chief Financial Officer for Holt Oversight & Logistical Technologies was caused from a closed brain injury and not from an “alleged pre-existing mental illness.” According to White’s Prudential plan, he is entitled to $7,500.00 per month in disability benefit payments as long as he is disabled from performing his own employment.

White Retains The Services Of A Disability Attorney To Straighten Out The Mess

Mr. White retained Attorney John Leonard to file a lawsuit against Prudential. In his lawsuit, White and his disability attorney, accuse Prudential of terminating White’s disability benefits in an “arbitrary and capricious manner,” as Prudential will not acknowledge that it based its denial of benefits to White by relying on the wrong person’s medical records. White’s appeal has been pending for 11 months and Prudential has refused to allow White to see his file, a violation of its fiduciary duty to consider White’s appeal in a timely manner.

Background Of White’s Disability Benefits Lawsuit Against Prudential

On April 21, 2007, James White, his wife, their four children, and their nephew were involved in a high-speed car accident when their SUV was hit and consequently violently flipped several times, resulting in the SUV having a crushed roof, and with White and his wife losing consciousness. White was diagnosed with a closed head trauma and other injuries and his wife was diagnosed with a “life threatening and horrific head and neck injuries.” White’s long-term prognosis was a permanent brain injury from which he suffers “persistent headaches, dizziness, persistent ringing [of] the ears, personality changes, word finding deficiencies, loss of ability to multitask, loss of ability to remember, forgetfulness, mid temporal lobe brain damage, diminished profusion in the left occipital lobes of the brain, dementia and cognitive deficits.” White’s life has undergone profound changes as a result of his permanent brain injury, and he suffers anxiety, emotional distress and depression, which are characteristic of brain injuries such as his.

Though ill, White, while undergoing rehabilitation for his injuries and attempting to heal, was taking care of his almost totally immobile wife and attending to their children’s everyday needs. In August 2007, White’s symptoms worsened and in October of 2007, he sought treatment from his physician, who referred White to a neurologist for his closed head injuries and cognitive problems. After numerous tests, White’s neurologist determined that White indeed has a permanent brain injury that has rendered White totally disabled. White was also seen by a neuropsychologist who wrote a report dated March 14, 2008 confirming that White had “no prior history of anxiety, depression or treatment of any psychological disorder or disease” before the accident.

After exhausting his accumulated sick, personal leave, and vacation time, White applied for his long term disability benefits in September 2007. Prudential denied White his benefits, claiming that White wasn’t entitled to disability benefits because he delayed seeking treatment for his brain injury. White appealed Prudential’s decision and on July 25, 2008, was again denied long term disability benefits. Time after time, White appealed Prudential’s decision, each time providing more information and test results to no avail. Almost out of appeals, White had another insurance carrier review his claim; that reviewer determined that White is totally disabled and documented the review, which White enclosed in his last appeal to Prudential again to no avail.

After exhaustive tests, numerous physician records and documentation conclusively determining that White suffers from a permanent brain injury disability as well as the independent review, Prudential granted White his disability benefits retroactive to July 21, 2007. According to his Plan, White’s disability benefits had a limit of 24 months. Consequently, after the 24-month period, Prudential again terminated White’s disability benefits.

White Files A Lawsuit Against Prudential In An Attempt To Recover His Disability Benefits

According to his complaint White’s disability termination was “in contravention of the Plan provisions which state: “Prudential will not apply the mental illness limitation to dementia, if it is a result of:… trauma.” White’s neurologist confirmed that White’s mental condition was a result of the car accident and that White had never suffered from dementia previous to the accident in which he sustained a traumatic brain injury. In addition, Prudential still relied on the wrong person’s medical record, and “ignored, avoided or downplayed the violent nature of the accident,” White’s obvious health problems, and the opinions of his treating physicians in evaluating White’s disability benefits claim.

With a long list of ERISA violations and Prudential policy violations, White and his disability lawyer accuse Prudential of demonstrating “numerous substantive deficiencies and procedural irregularities which when coupled with its reliance on the wrong person’s medical record, its refusal to decide the pending appeal, its ignoring the opinion, records and tests performed by [White’s] treating physicians, and its refusal to provide Plaintiff with access to the contents of claims,” Prudential has breached its fiduciary duties toward White and should be penalized for doing so.

White Seeks Judgment On His Disability Claim Against Prudential

White and his disability lawyer ask the Court to grant an Order compelling Prudential to pay White the full amount o his disability benefits from September 1, 2009 until the present time and continue disability payments to White for the period “set forth in the Plan” along with pre judgment interest, reasonable attorney’s fees and any other relief the Court see fit and appropriate to settle this Complaint.

How Can We Help With Your Prudential Disability Claim?

Leave a comment or ask us a question

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you help Prudential claimants nationwide?

We represent Prudential clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Prudential disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Prudential. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Prudential.

How do you help Prudential claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Prudential long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Prudential:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Kelly B. (Nevada)

I had been on long term disability for over 10 years, with Aetna disability company. I had 3 heart surgeries in that time and some other pretty serious medical issues. I was very ill, during that time, seeing my physicians regularly and in and out of the hospital. It was very stressful keeping up with the vast amounts of paperwork, physicians attending statements, and communicating full time with the disability company.

One time, right before my open heart surgery, they stopped paying my claim for 4 months, for absolutely no reason. I did get that straightened out, eventually, but we were almost homeless, in the process. I decided to consider a buy out, on my disability claim and I wanted to use a large, reputable attorney’s firm, to handle this negotiation and contract. I called and talked to an attorney named Rachel Alters, who worked for Attorneys Dell & Schaefer. They had a very large attorneys practice and I was very comfortable using them.

She was very professional, but also really compassionate, about everything I had been through. I felt like she would really be someone I could trust. It turned out the gentleman she ended up talking to, from Aetna, was someone she knew from dealing with them in the past. This made everything go so much easier, I think, but either way, Rachel is wonderful! I would recommend her very highly, to anyone. She has my five star recommendation!

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us