Prudential wrongfully denies disability insurance benefits to man with fibromyalgia

As an employee of Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential), Duane Morgan might have expected more of his employer when he had to take advantage of the long-term disability plan offered as part of his employment package. He had been a senior life representative when symptoms of chest pain, palpitations and dizziness, sweating and shaking, numbness in his arms, high blood pressure, difficulty sleeping, and diarrhea forced him to stop working in September 2005.

Prudential approved him for disability benefits based upon its finding that he was suffering from a major depressive disorder, anxiety and hypertension. He began receiving benefits on October 15, 2005. On March 28, 2006, Prudential converted his short-term disability benefits into long-term disability benefits. Then at the end of two years, on March 28, 2008, Prudential notified Morgan that his benefits were being terminated because his disability was “mental health diagnosis of depression and anxiety.” The company cited its mental illness limitation which capped benefits at 24 months.

Morgan appealed the termination of his benefits, claiming that he was disabled from fibromyalgia, not depression. He included a letter from his rheumatologist which confirmed the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Prudential sent his file for review, and based upon that review Prudential denied Morgan’s appeal, continuing to hold that Morgan’s disability was the result of depression, not fibromyalgia.

Claimant Files an ERISA Disability Lawsuit against Prudential

The first concern for the court was to determine which standard of review would apply. Prudential had discretion to interpret the plan and to decide whether benefits were payable. This meant that the court would use the arbitrary and capricious standard of review.

Morgan’s disability attorney pointed to the fact that there was a conflict of interest, despite the fact that Prudential funded its benefit plans through a trust and made fixed contributions to the trust. Normally, this would have resolved any conflict of interest, because the trust assets could not be used for any other purpose.

But the court found that because Prudential had to fund the trust to keep it solvent, this provided a basis for a financial conflict of interest. The more benefits that were paid out, the more contributions Prudential would have to make to the trust. Conflict of interest would be a factor to consider in determining whether Prudential’s denial of benefits was reasonable.

Guidelines for Determining Procedural Bias in Long-Term Disability Case

The court also determined that it would have to consider procedural bias in the review process. Signs of a biased review could include:

  • Failing to follow a plan’s notification provisions (Lemaire v. Hartford Life & Acc. T. Co.)
  • Relying on the opinion of a non-treating physician over the opinion of a treating physician without giving a reason for doing so. (Kosiba v. Merck & Co.; Ricca v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.)
  • Conducting self-serving paper reviews of medical files and relying on favorable parts while discarding unfavorable parts in a medical report (Post)
  • Denying benefits based on inadequate information and lax investigatory procedures, (Porter v. Broadspire W.D. Pa. 2007)
  • Ignoring the recommendations of an insurance company’s own employees (Post)

How would Prudential measure up against these factors? The Court would review the medical record that was available to Prudential at the time it made its final decision to terminate Morgan’s disability coverage.

Prudential’s Initial Review for Long-Term Disability Benefits

Morgan’s claim was initially evaluated on September 28, 2006. In the records provided by Morgan’s treating physicians, there was a mental health status examination conducted on May 20, 2006. Morgan’s neuropsychiatrist reported that Morgan had a major depressive disorder. This diagnosis was confirmed by other mental status examinations which had been conducted between 2005 and 2006. Morgan’s primary care physician reported on October 3, 2005 that anxiety was one obstacle that was preventing him from returning to work at Prudential. Morgan’s neurologist reported on February 9, 2006, that she suspected Morgan’s medical problems were connected to depression and lack of sleep. Yet another psychologist who was treating Morgan indicated that he had an anxiety disorder.

It was based on this information that Prudential reached the conclusion that Morgan’s functional impairment was primarily caused by depression and anxiety.

Prudential’s Reevaluation for Long-Term Disability Benefits

During a July 2, 2007 reevaluation of updated medical records, Prudential’s physician reviewer found that a September 16, 2006 neuropsychological evaluation still showed significant psychological deficits. There were records that Morgan was being treated with Zoloft and Cymbalta. There was also a December 4, 2006 letter that reported Morgan’s neuromuscular complaints, finding that his depression could not explain their existence. There were also records from December 29, 2006, February 9, 2007, and March 23, 2007 from the doctor who diagnosed him with fibromyalgia.

Prudential’s physician reached the conclusion, without citing medical authority for doing so, that fibromyalgia “rarely prevents the claimant from performing light or sedentary work.” In his opinion fibromyalgia was unlikely to cause continuous impairment.

This review was followed by a final review on March 11, 2008. Additional treatment notes regarding Morgan’s fibromyalgia treatments were now present in the record. These included notes from office visits on May 24, 2007, September 27, 2007, and January 31, 2008. Morgan’s doctor noted that he had some good days and bad days, and on one visit had 18 of 18 fibromyalgia tender points, while on the other two displayed 14 out of 18.

Prudential’s physician concluded that based upon these updated medical records Morgan was not sufficiently impaired “from any physical condition” that would prevent him from performing light or sedentary work. Based on this conclusion he recommended that Morgan be further evaluated. He recommended a functional capacity questionnaire be completed by Morgan’s rheumatologist identifying any physical obstacles that might prevent him from returning to work. He also recommended an independent medical examination (IME) by a rheumatologist, and surveillance.

Morgan’s rheumatologist completed the functional capacity questionnaire as requested. He verified that Morgan was unable to work full or part time because he could not stand or walk for more than 5 min. at a time, or sit for more than 10 min. at a time. Among the other limitations that he reported were Morgan’s inability to lift 20 pounds at any time, and his recommendation that he only lift 10 pounds occasionally. He also reported that Morgan have a limited ability to stoop, kneel, or reach overhead.

Prudential also ordered the IME, which occurred on May 5, 2008. This physician gave his opinion that Morgan did not suffer from a functional abnormality caused by musculoskeletal disease and also gave his opinion that Morgan’s chronic pain was “not documented by any objective findings.” This physician made it clear that he was unable to determine whether or not Morgan’s disability was related to anxiety or depression.

When, on May 22, 2008, Prudential advised Morgan that they were going to terminate his benefits, the disability plan reported that the physician conducting the IME and the physician reviewing his records had both reached the conclusion that his disability was the result of depression and anxiety.

When Morgan appealed on August 12, 2008, he provided three updated letters from his treating physicians. Two of his doctors clearly diagnosed his condition as fibromyalgia, and his treating neuropsychiatrist concluded that his anxiety was secondary to his fibromyalgia. It was the fibromyalgia which was preventing him from working.

When Prudential hired a board-certified rheumatologist to review Morgan’s medical records, the rheumatologist reached the conclusion that he did have fibromyalgia, but disagreed with his physicians that he was disabled as a result of the disorder. He pointed to “the absence of motor weakness, loss of muscle strength and tone, abnormalities in station and gait… [or] any focal neurologic abnormalities” as support of his conclusion.

Based on this physician’s conclusions, Prudential denied Morgan’s appeal. Prudential agreed that he did have fibromyalgia, but the long-term disability insurance plan concluded that this was not the cause of his functional impairment.

Court Considers Whether Medical Records Support Long-Term Disability Caused by Fibromyalgia

The court had to consider these same medical records to determine whether or not Prudential’s conclusion was reasonable. Was Morgan’s disability caused by mental illness, in whole or part? Or was his primary disability fibromyalgia, which caused anxiety and depression? The answer to these questions would determine whether or not Prudential’s decision was reasonable. Even if his mental illness contributed to his physical condition, the court would find Prudential’s decision was unreasonable, because this would place the court in a situation where it would always have to rule that someone who suffered from anxiety or depression as the result of a physical condition could not qualify for benefits based upon the physical condition.

Because Prudential concluded that Morgan’s mental illness caused his disability independently of his fibromyalgia, the court looked at whether the medical records supported this conclusion. This meant that the court compared how Prudential weighed the conclusions of the physicians it hired, versus the opinions of Morgan’s treating physicians.

First, the court found that the doctor, whose opinion was given the most weight, was neither a psychiatrist nor a rheumatologist, yet Prudential concluded that he had the ability to determine that Morgan’s anxiety and depression, not fibromyalgia caused his impairment.

When the court looked at the conclusions drawn from the IME, it found that the rheumatologist had ignored the fact that fibromyalgia is not a disease; it is a syndrome. In requiring the presence of an “organic muscular skeletal disease” to explain Morgan’s pain, he failed to recognize the nature of fibromyalgia. Thus his analysis produced erroneous conclusions.

The court had found in Steel that “requiring objective evidence of fibromyalgia would arbitrarily and capriciously eliminate all disability claims based on the disorder.” And Prudential had already been warned in its case with Kuhn that the long-term disability plan could not require physical findings or objective evidence of fibromyalgia. To rely on the fact that Morgan had no objective findings to support his fibromyalgia was arbitrary.

Prudential Abused Its Discretion – Must Reinstate Long-Term Disability Benefits.

The court found that Prudential had clearly abused its discretion and reached an arbitrary conclusion when it chose to terminate Morgan’s long-term disability benefits. As a result the court granted summary judgment to Morgan and denied Prudential’s motion for summary judgment on its behalf.

This case once again highlights how important it is to contact a long-term disability attorney that understands fibromyalgia claims.

Learn more: Top Ten Reasons For Prudential Disability Denials

Did you find this helpful?
Unhelpful (0)

Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits

Disability Benefit Denial Options
Submit a Strong Prudential Appeal Package

We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Prudential appeal.

Learn more

Sue Prudential

We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Prudential.

Learn more

Protect Your Benefits
Get Your Prudential Disability Application Approved
We help claimants throughout the entire application process.

Learn more

Prevent a Prudential Disability Benefit Denial
We manage every aspect of your disability claim following claim approval.

Learn more

Negotiate a Prudential Lump-Sum Settlement

Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.

Learn more

Prudential Reviews

Policy Holder Rating

1.5 out of 5
Read 27 reviews
0%would recommend
Timely Payments
1.9out of 5
Handling Claim
2.0out of 5
Customer Service
2.0out of 5
2.0out of 5
1.9out of 5
Showing 8 of 642 Reviews

California State Disabilty "OFFSET" never mentioned or outlined when enrolling for STD coverage.

Reviewed by MartyG on June 29th 2023   Verified Policyholder | May 2023 date of disability
All terms and conditions of receiving a claim benefit not made available when enrolling. Hidden elements of eligibility... not fully transparent with issues that might eff... read more >

Prudential terminated my LTD, so now I have no income

Reviewed by Carlos M on June 10th 2022   Verified Policyholder
I was working at a shipyard at San Diego and hurt my back again while working. Hurt my back in the US Navy in 98 and had issues since then so I decided to get the surgery ... read more >
Sent on June 11th 2022 by Attorney Rachel Alters

Carlos, yes we may be able to help. Please email your denial letter to and cc Thank you.


Prudential cancelled my policy amid COVID crisis

Reviewed by Patricia M. on September 15th 2020   Verified Policyholder
In the mist of the covid crisis Prudential decided I needed to prove my disability, yet again. I have been physically disabled since 10/31/1989. I now know that I have bee... read more >
Sent on September 15th 2020 by Attorney Jay Symonds

Patricia: This is a terrible situation. You likely have a right to appeal the decision. I suggest you contact our office and speak with one of the attorneys to discuss ... read more >


I was sold a policy that I cannot use and no one will show me the policy

Reviewed by Jacqueline G. on August 18th 2020   Verified Policyholder
I had Prudential STD and LTD through my employer. I received my STD with no problem. Started receiving LTD for a while, then Prudential said I owed them because I receive ... read more >
Sent on August 18th 2020 by Attorney Stephen Jessup

Jacqueline, in many cases a disability carrier cannot offset for SSDI benefits that were in place prior to the date of disability under the applicable policy. Your empl... read more >


Prudential verbally approved my claim and then sent me a denial letter

Reviewed by Jacquieline C. on April 3rd 2020   Verified Policyholder
I have been denied twice from Prudential for my LTD case. Back injury 2009 – knee injury 2011. Back doctor took me out of work (July 2018) due to me working 35 hrs per w... read more >
Sent on April 3rd 2020 by Attorney Jay Symonds

Jacqueline: Sounds like you have a pretty complex medical situation. And the fact that they verbally approved your claim over the phone then sent a denial letter is unu... read more >


It would cost me more to fight Prudential than to let them get away with their games

Reviewed by Tim W. on December 9th 2017   Verified Policyholder
I’ve been thru all the same things everyone complains about here. I’ve always been one step ahead of their game due to research. I just got notice they are stopping my... read more >

Prudential told me I would have a decision today, and now the need another week. Guess what, I'm still broke

Reviewed by Cancer Patient on June 22nd 2017   Verified Policyholder
Just called them and now they need another week and a half so they can do an occupational review on my job description or something like that. Even though the case manager... read more >
Sent on June 22nd 2017 by Attorney Stephen Jessup

DL, many state insurance commissioners will not get involved in ERISA governed disability insurance policies as these polices are governed under federal law. Please fee... read more >


Prudential is the most dishonest and immoral company ever!

Reviewed by Marie C. on April 5th 2017   Verified Policyholder
Prudential is the most dishonest and immoral company ever! My husband has been on LTD with them for a few years. In December they sent a letter asking for $11,000 back. He... read more >
Answered Questions by Our Lawyers
Showing 8 of 40 Answered Questions

Q: Prudential denied me STD due to a doctor who wrote personal things about me, like I still drive.

Answered on May 27th 2024 by Attorney Gregory Dell
A: We are sorry to hear about your denial. Please contact us and we will review your denial letter. We can discus... Read More >

Q: Prudential is sending me to an IME but refuses to allow recording. Should I refuse to go to the IME?

Answered on May 7th 2024 by Attorney Gregory Dell
A: Mike:This is always a tough situation. You cannot refuse to go. I would show up with a witness and a recor... Read More >

Q: What can I do about my long term benefits that’s ending after 2 years?

Answered on June 6th 2023 by Attorney Gregory Dell
A: Prudential is likely telling you that they will stop paying you in September because they either think you sho... Read More >

Q: My mother paid many years for a long-term care policy. When she had to be put in an assisted care facility, Prudential won't pay. Do you accept cases like this?

Answered on March 23rd 2023 by Attorney Gregory Dell
A: Allan, I am sorry to hear about Prudential’s long term care denial for your Mom’s care. We have handled ma... Read More >

Q: Can Prudential deny me if SSDI approves me?

Answered on December 28th 2020 by Attorney Steven Dell
A: Lauraine, unfortunately you can be denied even if SSDI approved you. If you need assistance managing your LTD ... Read More >

Q: How does Prudential calculate attorney fees?

Answered on July 31st 2010 by Attorney Stephen Jessup
A: Lomy, calculate attorney fees for what exactly? Under ERISA, the federal law that governs employer provided po... Read More >

Q: Can I sue my PRUDENTIAL LTD for the cost of hiring a disability attorney to get my benefits reinstated?

Answered on June 1st 2020 by Attorney Jay Symonds
A: Loretta: Assuming the attorney was successful and got the denial overturned, the short answer is no you cannot... Read More >

Q: Do I have to pay back my STD and LTD after being approved for Widows SSD?

Answered on February 16th 2020 by Attorney Cesar Gavidia
A: Kathy, it depends on the terms of your disability insurance policy. Refer to your disability insurance policy ... Read More >
Helpful Videos
Showing 12 of 896 Videos
Disability Benefit Tips
Showing 8 of 331 Benefit Tips

Prudential Lump Sum Disability Policy Buyout Options

If you're a Prudential long term disability insurance claimant who has been on claim for a mo... Read More >

Is Exhaustion of Remedies Required before filing an ERISA Lawsuit?

In Deborah Holmes v. The Prudential Insurance Company and Bekaert Corporation, the Plaintiff was employed by the Bekaert C... Read More >

What Should I Expect When Suing Prudential for a Disability Insurance Benefit Denial?

Disability benefit lawsuits against Prudential is a daily occurrence for our lawyers.In t... Read More >

Do I need to disclose my disability insurance claim if I filed for bankruptcy?

Do I need to disclose my disability insurance claim if I filed for bankruptcy?Yes. If you file for bankruptcy it is imperative that you di... Read More >

Can I submit a long-term disability claim if my employment has been terminated?

It is not uncommon for employees to struggle and suffer through sickness or injury and work, even if working is counter-intuitive to their own... Read More >

How Much Time Does Prudential Have to Make A Determination On an ERISA Disability Appeal?

The amount of time that an insurance company is allotted to provide a decision for an ERISA disability appeal is often confusing to claimants ... Read More >

If I File A Short Term Disability Claim With My Carrier And My Claim Is Denied, Do I Also Need To File A Separate Long Term Disability Claim?

An issue that comes up often during litigation of a claim for disability benefits is: After exhausting all of your administrative remedies for... Read More >
Dell Disability Cases
Showing 8 of 375 Dell Disability Cases

Engineer With Depression Wins Prudential LTD Appeal

The claimant is a former Senior Technology Services Engineer for Accolade, Inc. who was force... Read More >

Dell Disability Lawyers Win Disability Insurance Appeal Against Prudential for KPMG Employee

Our client, a former Managing Director - Tax Consultant for KPMG contacted our office after h... Read More >

Lawyer Wins 24 Month Mental Nervous Prudential Disability Denial

Our client, a former law partner of a large national law firm, filed for disability with Prud... Read More >

Research Epidemiologist with chronic fatigue / ME wins LTD appeal against Prudential

Our client is a former Mental Health Epidemiologist who unfortunately suffered the progressive onset of perv... Read More >

JP Morgan Chase Financial Advisor With Cancer Wins Prudential Long Term Disability Appeal

Our client was a 58 year old private client advisor for JP Morgan Chase Bank. He wa... Read More >

Prudential Fails to Pay Long Term Disability Benefits of Claimant Suffering from Addison’s Disease

What is Addison’s Disease?Our client is a 43-year-old male who was employed as a Manage... Read More >

Successful Appeal Against Prudential Gets Breast Cancer Survivor Back on Claim for LTD Benefits

Nearly ten years after initially beating breast cancer, our client was distraught to hear that she had a reoccurrence of the disease in 2015. ... Read More >
Disability Lawsuit Stories
Showing 8 of 765 Lawsuit Stories

Court Finds Prudential Abused its Discretion in Denying LTD Benefits

In James Ampe v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al., Plaintiff Ampe worked for several years for the Massachusetts ... Read More >

Prudential Wrongfully Relies on Neuropsychological Report to Deny LTD Benefits After 12 Years

Initial denialMr. Paquin became disabled in 2003 after contracting encephalitis from a mosquito infected with the West Nile virus. The inf... Read More >

California Court Overturns Prudential Denial of LTD Benefits

In reviewing long term disability denial letters we find that there are a handful of industry wide arguments made by insurance companies to mi... Read More >

California Court Overturns Prudential Denial of Disability Benefits

In the case of Gallegos v. Prudential, a California Federal District in the Northern District of California entered an order instructing Prude... Read More >

Prudential Denies Long Term Disability Claim Due to Insurance Fraud

Our office was recently contacted by an insured whose claim for long term disability benefits had been recently and abruptly denied by Prudent... Read More >

Texas Court Dismisses ERISA Lawsuit due to Judicial Estoppel

The case of Kidd v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America demonstrates the importance of disclosing all potential assets on a bankruptcy... Read More >

Prudential Denial of Disability Benefits to Employee that Was Disabled While Working is Reversed

Long-term disability attorneys Cesar Gavidia and Gregory Dell discuss a recent case against P... Read More >

Federal ERISA Lawsuit Filed Against Prudential After It Denies Long-term Disability Benefits to Insured With Parkinson's Disease

Mr. G had previously worked as a foreman for a large fertilizer company. One day at work Mr. G suffered a fall into a bin of fertilizer. Altho... Read More >

Reviews from Our Clients

Request a Free Consultation

Our Lawyers Respond Same Day

5 Ways We Help Get Your Benefits Paid

Get Your Disability Application Approved

Our goal is to get your application for disability income benefits approved. Applying for disability benefits can be a difficult process and the information you provide is critical. Most disability insurance companies look at your application in hopes of finding a reason to deny your claim. Your disability company will ask you to complete numerous forms, interview you, request lots of information, speak with your doctors and possibly request to have you examined by their "hired gun" doctor.

Through our experience of having helped thousands of disability insurance claimants, our lawyers will guide you through the entire application process and give you the best chance to get your disability claim approved the first time.

Submit A Strong Appeal Package

If your disability insurance benefits have been wrongfully denied, then our lawyers know exactly what it takes to get your disability claim approved. You only get once chance to submit an Appeal, therefore every piece of evidence that will support your disability claim must be included. The goal is to win your disability benefits at the Appeal level, but while preparing your Appeal you must consider how a federal judge will review your disability claim if your benefit denial is upheld.

Preparing a strong disability appeal package is an art that requires you to understand how the courts interpret your disability policy language, ERISA regulations / laws, and how to strategically present evidence in support of your definition of "disability". We encourage you to contact any of our lawyers for a free immediate review of your disability denial.

Sue Your Disability Company

98% of the disability insurance lawsuits filed by our law firm have resulted in either the payment of benefits or a lump-sum settlement agreement. Our disability lawyers have filed ERISA governed and private policy long term disability insurance lawsuits against every major disability insurance company in state and federal courts nationwide and we love fighting for the "little guy" against the multi-billion dollar insurance company giants.

We have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for our clients and we would like the opportunity to provide you with a free review of your disability benefit denial. There are many complex factors in a disability benefit lawsuit and the legal battle to win long term disability benefits can be fierce.

Prevent A Disability Benefit Denial

Approval of long-term disability is a continuous process as every disability insurance company will evaluate your eligibility for benefits on a monthly basis. You can never let your guard down and assume that your disability company will continue to pay your benefits for as long as you think you need them.

Our law firm offers a reasonable flat fee monthly claim handling service in which we handle every aspect of your long-term disability claim and do whatever it takes to make sure you are paid every month.

Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement

Let's discuss if a lump-sum settlement or buyout of your disability insurance claim is both available and makes financial sense for you. Our lawyers have negotiated more than five-hundred million dollars in disability insurance buyouts and we know how to get you a maximum settlement. A disability insurance company is not required to offer a buyout and not every disability company offers them.

Questions About Hiring Us

Who are Dell Disability Lawyers?

We are disability insurance lawyers that know how to get your short or long term disability benefits paid. As a nationwide law firm we have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants throughout the United States to collect hundreds of millions of dollars of disability insurance benefits from every major disability insurance company.

In more than 98% of our cases, our lawyers have been able to either get our clients paid monthly disability benefits or obtain a one-time lump-sum settlement. Our lawyers have seen it all when it comes to disability insurance claims and we know exactly what it takes for your disability claim to be approved.

We welcome you to contact any of our attorneys for a free immediate review of your disability claim. We also invite you to visit and subscribe to our YouTube channel where we have more than 700 videos and regularly provide tips to help protect your disability benefits.

Who do you help?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer. We have helped individuals in almost every type of occupation with monthly disability benefit payments ranging from $1,500 to $50,000.

Our clients include all types of employees ranging from retail associates, sales representatives, government employees, police officers, teachers, janitors, nurses, pilots, truck drivers, financial advisors, doctors, dentists, veterinarians, lawyers, consultants, IT professionals, engineers, professional athletes, business owners, and high level executives.

A strong understanding and presentation of the duties of your occupation is essential for securing disability insurance benefits.

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via phone, email, fax, GoToMeeting sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-698-9159 or by email. Lawyers and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.