Liberty Mutual Approves Disability Benefits to Senior Vice President
Our client, a former Senior Vice President for a large national corporation, filed for disability after having suffered a massive stroke during heart surgery that left the entire left side of his body paralyzed and severely affected his ability to effectively communicate. His doctors were not sure if he would ever regain use of the left side of his body again and feared he may be wheelchair bound the rest of his life. While he was undergoing intensive physical and speech rehabilitation he filed a claim for short term disability benefits with Liberty Mutual under his employer’s disability policy. Liberty Mutual approved his claim for short term disability without issues and paid his benefit through the maximum benefit period for short term disability. It would seem that after all he had been through that our client’s claim for long term disability benefits would be quickly approved. However, as is often the case with Liberty Mutual, what should have been a clear cut case turned out to be nothing of the sort.
Long Term Disability Denial
After taking nearly two months to review the long term disability portion of the claim, Liberty advised our client on New Year’s Eve that it was denying his claim for long term disability benefits as it had determined that he was fully capable of returning to his former occupation as a Senior Vice President just several months after his stroke. In disbelief our client and his wife contacted our office and spoke with Attorney Stephen Jessup.
Attorney Jessup obtained a copy of the denial letter and was shocked to read Liberty’s findings that resulted in the denial of benefits. In denying the claim Liberty cited the medical evaluation performed by its doctor during the course of short term disability, which supported that our client would not be able to perform his occupational duties or meet the Department of Labor definition of Sedentary work. However a few months after this report was written Liberty’s new doctor disagreed with the short term disability doctor as well as our client’s treatment providers and determined that our client had an essentially clean bill of health and would be able to work in a light work demand level.
There was nothing in the medical records to support this position and the only difference between Liberty’s handling of the short term disability claim and the long term disability claim that Attorney Jessup could see came down to money. Liberty was not responsible for paying short term disability benefits so they had no problem paying benefits, but was responsible for the payment of long term disability benefits. This was a blatant abuse of discretion and a textbook example of a conflict of interest.
Attorney Jessup’s first course of action was obtaining a complete copy of our client’s claim file from Liberty. Contained in the claim file would be all medical reviews completed by Liberty along with the vocational information Liberty relied upon in determining our client’s occupational duties. After reviewing the claim file Attorney Jessup focused his attack on Liberty’s “interpretation” of our client’s occupation as a Senior Vice President.
As is common with Liberty disability claim reviews when reviewing the duties of one’s pre-disability occupation they reduced the material and substantial duties of our client’s occupation to be nothing more than the ability to perform at a Sedentary demand level. Liberty essentially held that to perform the duties of a Senior Vice President out client had to be nothing more than a warm body in a chair capable of lifting up to 10lbs occasionally. To come to this conclusion, Liberty only focused its attention on our client’s cardiology records and paid no mind to the extensive physical therapy records and medical support from his doctors as to his ongoing limitations.
Attorney Jessup developed a two prong attack to combat this position: (1) Attack the vocational review and Liberty’s inappropriate and bad faith interpretation of what were very clear policy provisions related to disability and (2) prove that regardless of the actual occupational duties required of him that our client did not possess the physical ability to work at a Sedentary demand level.
In preparing our client’s appeal Attorney Jessup had him undergo a Functional Capacity Examination with one of our experts to properly document his physical restrictions and limitations, which despite our client’s ability to regain use of the left side of his body, proved to be substantial. Attorney Jessup then took the results of the testing and prepared targeted questionnaires for our client’s doctors to further undermine the opinions of Liberty’s hired guns. Confident that the file supported medically necessary restrictions and limitations that would prove our client could not work Attorney Jessup then made argument as to Liberty’s vocational review.
It was argued in the appeal that Liberty created requirements for disability that were not found in the long term disability policy and that were in direct conflict with the actual definition of disability. Attorney Jessup prepared a detailed vocational report that set forth the actual material and substantial duties a Senior Vice President must be able to perform in order to effectively do the job. Needless to say the duties far surpassed the ability to perform minimal sedentary demand duties. Not sparing any blows, Attorney Jessup called out Liberty’s about face during the transition between short and long term disability benefits and noted the only reason for the long term denial was Liberty’s financial interest to avoid paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in benefits to our client.
Despite overwhelming evidence of disability in the appeal, Liberty still took nearly two months to approve our client’s claim for long term disability benefits. Even in approving benefits Liberty aggressively threatened to immediately offset our client’s benefit if he did not apply for Social Security. This type of behavior is all too common and is uncalled for from an insurance company that has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of its insured. Although our client does not have a great deal of time left on disability Liberty has made it clear that it will continue to demand information from our client.
Do you need help with Liberty Mutual?
If your claim has been denied by Liberty Mutual or you have questions regarding your claim please feel free to contact our office and speak to Attorney Jessup or one of our other disability attorneys to discuss your rights and assess how we may be able to assist you.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Liberty Mutual Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Liberty Mutual Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Liberty Mutual Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Gregory Dell and Stephen Jessup discuss their experience in handling Liberty Mutual claims at all stages
After it had previously overturned a denial after an initial Dell Disability Lawyers Appeal, Liberty denied our client's claim again. After a new appeal, Liberty has now agreed to reinstate our client yet again.
Dell Disability Lawyers Successfully Appeals Denial of Benefits to Former Inventory Control Specialist
Liberty Mutual Twice Denies and Approves Long-term Disability Benefits to IT Systems Analyst with Rheumatoid Arthritis
After Initially Being Denied Long Term Disability Benefits, Dell Disability Lawyers Gets Former Wal-Mart Employee on Claim with Liberty Mutual
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.