Federal Court Examines Vocational Reviews and ERISA Disability
What is an Occupation?
Pursuant to the vast majority of ERISA governed disability insurance policies, an Occupation is defined based on one of two standards – Own Occupation or Any Occupation. Quite often an insurance carrier will overlook the actual duties of an occupation and simply determine the ability to work based on the physical demand level associated with a particular occupation. If you are receiving disability insurance benefits or have been denied benefits you have most likely read somewhere in correspondence from the insurance carrier that they have deemed your occupation to be “sedentary” or “light duty.”
In the event of a claim denial an insurance carrier will typically indicate it has determined you can perform sedentary duty work (or any other corresponding physical demand level) and can therefore work in your “own” or “any” occupation. However, it should go without saying that the ability to perform at a particular physical demand level is by no means indicative of the ability to actually perform the material and substantial duties of an occupation. Unfortunately, insurance companies often fail to understand this logic.
An insurance company typically conducts a vocational analysis/review to determine what constitutes the material duties of a particular occupation, and in doing so typically rely on a variety of vocational resources such as the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, O*Net, Job Descriptions, etc. to complete the review. Failure to conduct such a vocational review as part of the claims determination process has been deemed by multiple Federal courts to be evidence arbitrary and capricious claims handling.
In a recent ruling from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division in the case of Daniel Travis v. Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Plan, the Court echoed this established opinion. In the Travis case, the Court reviewed Mr. Travis’s entitlement to Total Disability Pension benefits under an ERISA governed pension plan. In denying Mr. Travis’s claim for total disability benefits the Pension Plan relied upon its medical reviewer’s opinion that Mr. Travis could perform a sedentary demand level job and that based on that assertion alone the Pension Plan was not required to perform a vocational review.
The Pension Plan argued to the Court that the Plan did not expressly state that vocational considerations had to be taken into account when determining whether Mr. Travis was totally disabled. Mr. Travis’s attorney argued that the Pension Plan could not construe the terms of the plan so strictly as to mean that if Mr. Travis could engage in any physical activity whatsoever that he could work regardless of any required vocational qualifications. The Court agreed with Mr. Travis, holding the Pension Plan abused its discretion by failing to perform a vocational analysis to determine whether Travis could work in some vocation given his physical restrictions and limitations. The Court remanded the case back to the Pension Plan to conduct a vocational analysis to determine Travis’s entitlement to benefits.
What to do if your insurance company is evaluating your claim for disability benefits using improper vocational information
If your insurance company is not properly determining vocational ability in light of the applicable definition of disability do not wait till a denial of benefits before challenging the carrier’s assertion. Please feel free to contact our office to discuss how we may be able to assist you ensuring that your insurance carrier is properly reviewing your claim.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Attorney Alexander Palamara of Dell Disability Lawyers gets LTD Benefits Reinstated for former Walmart Manager who is now found disabled from Any Occupation
NFL Disability Review Board Ignores Evidence of Disability and Appeal Court Reverses Lower Court Decision
California Federal Judge Orders Standard Insurance Company to Pay Disability Benefits to Teacher with Lyme Disease
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.