Disability policy covering only employers not subject to ERISA jurisdiction
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction a case brought by a disability-insured physician against his insurer for breach of contract and misrepresentation. Because the policy extended coverage only to the physician-owner of a medical practice and his partner, and not to their employees, it fell outside the jurisdiction of the ERISA statue.
Dr. Andrew McGowan Jr. owned a medical practice. He maintained disability insurance with U.S. Life Insurance Co. in the City of New York. McGowan sued U.S. Life in state court, alleging breach of contract, constructive trust and misrepresentation, and seeking recovery of insurance premiums and declaratory relief.
U.S. Life removed the action to federal district court. McGowan moved to remand the case to state court, contending that the policy at issue was not part of an ERISA-governed plan and that the district court therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
The district court noted that ERISA grants federal courts subject matter jurisdiction of certain actions brought by employee benefits plan participants. Here, McGowan presented an affidavit asserting that no employees of his professional corporation were covered under his policies with U.S. Life and that the policies extended coverage only to himself and his physician partner in the corporation. U.S. Life did not challenge McGowan’s assertions.
The district court concluded that, based on the record, it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action. McGowan’s uncontroverted evidence indicated that the policy covered only owner-workers and thus fell outside ERISA’s ambit. While a plan that covers both owners and non-owner employees falls within ERISA, a plan covering only owners or partners fall outside the statue’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the case was remanded to state court.
See McGowan v. U.S. Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, No. 06-7680 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2007).
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong appeal.
Sue Your Disability Insurance Company
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide.
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Sedgewich is the worst-immediate denial of all requests for treatment. Rubber stamps DENIED ALL RFA’s
Very very slow to respond
They leave you unable to fight
Reply
Hartford Stopped Payments
Prudential terminated my LTD, so now I have no income
Reply
Lincoln Financial made my life a living hell
Reply
They demanded an overpayment, stopped my claim, and lied about it
Reply
Sun Life is a real pain
Reply
Disability Denial Reason #1 – Paper Review & IME
How to Apply for Reliance Standard Disability Benefits & Top 5 Reasons for a Claim Denial
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
Guardian Disability Benefit Claim Handling Tips
Application Tips: Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefits - Top Denial Reasons
Is UNUM a Good Insurance Company?
Don’t Ignore Disability Insurance. Here’s What to Buy.
How To Get Long Term Disability Benefits Approved Due To Neck Pain
Lincoln Approves Long Term Disability Benefits After Four Year Fight
Cigna Sued For Failing To Make A Timely Decision on Appeal
Lincoln National LTD Denial for Pre-Existing Condition Reversed on Appeal
Illinois Mutual terminates benefits for Tire Kingdom Service Manager After Review By Hired Physician
A Hartford Disability Benefit Lawsuit Victory for Truist Banker with Lupus
Hartford Denies Disability Benefits To Home Depot Employee 3 Weeks Before Change of Disability Definition
Lincoln overturned its previous denial of LTD benefits for Escalation Engineer
JP Morgan Chase Financial Advisor With Cancer Wins Prudential Long Term Disability Appeal
Reviews from Our Clients






