Disability benefits lawsuit against Fortis Benefits Insurance Company dismissed by West Virginia Federal Court

Failing to comply with administrative requirements in a timely manner as specified by Fortis Benefits Insurance Company resulted in Elizabeth A. Bailey being denied benefits from her deceased husband’s short-term disability benefits, long-term disability benefits and life insurance policies. Having neglected to follow proper ERISA procedures in pursuing long-term disability and life insurance benefits from Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Assurant) as specified in Fortis’s policy requirements, Elizabeth Bailey forfeited her opportunity to present her case to a federal court when her complaint was dismissed by the Court’s ruling on two motions for summary judgment filed by Fortis’s disability defense attorneys.

While the complaint filed by Bailey and her disability attorneys addressed her husband’s denied short term disability benefits as well, the shocking outcome of her complaint lies in the denial of a widow’s benefits because of a paperwork requirement she failed to comply with.

The United States District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia dismissed Bailey’s complaint on February 2, 2011 due, primarily, to an ERISA requirement that participants in disability insurance policies that fall under ERISA can only appeal to a federal court when the participant has exhausted all administrative remedies to resolve a dispute previous to filing a complaint in federal court. Ms. Bailey and her deceased husband had not taken advantage of these options beforehand and consequently, the Southern District Court of West Virginia dismissed Ms. Bailey’s claim with prejudice. Most ERISA governed policies only allow 180 days to submit an appeal of a benefits denial.

Ms. Bailey was unable to provide factual proof that she had properly applied for Mr. Bailey’s long-term disability or life insurance benefits. For instance, Fortis requires written proof of death of the plan-holder along with a completed claim form. Ms. Bailey faxed a copy of her husband’s death certificate, but did not supply Fortis with a completed claim form for its administrative record. In addition, Fortis requires claimants to provide a completed written form for long-term disability benefits, and unfortunately, there was no evidence that either Ms. Bailey or Mr. Bailey had met the requirements of this specification.

Adrian Bailey’s disabling condition

Employed as a case worker, Adrian Bailey began suffering from severe depression in 1992. Bailey began seeing a psychiatrist in 1996 to battle his symptoms of anxiety and constant worrying, was prescribed an antidepressant, and advised to pursue psychotherapy. December 24, 1996, approximately one month after his appointment with a psychiatrist, Bailey ceased working; and on December 30, 1996, he made an emergency appointment with his psychiatrist to address his consumption of two-weeks-worth of his antidepressant which he attributed to an “amnesic episode” as opposed to a suicide attempt. At this appointment, Bailey complained that he was unable to concentrate at his job and was too stressed to continue working as a social case worker.

In January 1997, Mr. Bailey applied for short-term disability benefits, supported by the findings of his psychiatrist and was granted short term disability benefits by Fortis. A few months later, in March of 1997, Bailey’s psychiatrist informed Fortis that Bailey was improved and was capable of working on a limited basis, but the psychiatrist did not clear Mr. Bailey to return to work yet. A couple of months later, the psychiatrist completed a supplementary report and stated that Bailey had no physical limitations, but felt Bailey would benefit from psychiatric rehabilitation services.

In June of 1997, Fortis suspended Bailey’s short-term disability benefits pending a review by Fortis’s Clinical Services Department. In one conversation with Bailey’s psychiatrist, Fortis reported that the doctor stated that Bailey was no longer disabled and could return to work. Upon learning of this conversation, Bailey requested that Fortis hold off a benefits decision until he could provide Fortis with his psychologist’s records. Bailey’s psychologist determined that Bailey showed signs of suffering from bipolar and paranoia, but she also insinuated that Bailey might be malingering in an attempt to continue receiving benefits. She recommended, among other things, “possible hospitalization.” Soon after this recommendation, Bailey was admitted to Thomas Memorial Hospital on June 27, 1997. Again it was noted by the attending physician that Bailey was fixated on re-obtaining his disability benefits.

Following his hospitalization, Bailey was shuffled between appointments with his psychologist and psychiatrists, and their comments of Bailey’s malingering and Bailey not being disabled, resulted in the conclusion by Fortis in August of 1997 that Bailey was no longer disabled and suggested that Bailey look for work in another occupation or at another facility from the one where his problems had developed.

Elizabeth Bailey’s disability attorney files complaint in District Court

In September of 1997, Bailey’s wife filed a complaint claiming that Bailey’s psychiatrist had never informed Bailey that he could return to work, which triggered a formal appeal to Fortis concerning its decision to deny disability benefits to Bailey. Fortis submitted Bailey’s medical records for evaluation and determined that Bailey was no longer an eligible member for disability benefits under its Short Term Plan with his previous employer and thus, was not eligible for disability benefits from Fortis. Bailey’s short term disability appeal was denied.

After being awarded Social Security disability benefits in September of 1998, Bailey again filed a second complaint to the West Virginia Office of the Insurance Commissioner which triggered a second appeal of Fortis’s decision to deny Bailey disability benefits. Bailey’s medical history was again reviewed by yet another in-house physician and Fortis upheld its previous decision to deny benefits to Bailey.

While the appeal was pending, Bailey died on April 17, 1999, and in September 2001, his widow, Elizabeth Bailey, as the personal representative of Bailey’s estate, filed the ERISA lawsuit discussed here.

Bailey’s Appeal to the Southern District Court of West Virginia

Elizabeth Bailey felt she was entitled to an award of her deceased husband’s short-term disability benefits, long term disability benefits, and his life insurance benefits. Ms. Bailey claimed that the administrator of Bailey’s ERISA benefit abused its discretion.

Standard of Review

West Virginia District Court had two things to consider in deciding if ERISA abused its discretion in relation to Mr. and Mrs. Bailey and the denial of Mr. Bailey’s disability benefits. An ERISA plan can confer discretion in two ways:

(1) by language which ‘expressly creates discretionary authority,’ and
(2) by terms which ‘create discretion by implication.’

The Court’s mandate was to determine if Fortis abused its discretionary role and, in this case the Court determined that Fortis did not abuse its discretion and used the “appropriate standard of review” in making its decisions concerning Bailey’s short term disability benefits, long term disabilities benefits and life insurance benefits.

The Court’s Analysis

The United States District Court of West Virginia determined:

  1. In relation to Bailey’s Short Term Plan, the Court determined that there was sufficient evidence to suggest that Bailey was fit to return to work as early as May 22, 1997.
  2. In relation to Bailey’s Long-Term Disability and Life Insurance Benefits, the Court determined that the Baileys failed to “fully exhaust” the administrative means for procuring Bailey’s long-term disability and life insurance benefits; and thus, Elizabeth Bailey was not entitled to these benefits.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

Leave a comment or ask us a question

There are 6 comments

  • Linda,

    Unfortunately if your claim was denied in 2001 and you did not pursue legal recourse there stands the likely chance your statute of limitations have long since expired.

    Stephen JessupOct 19, 2015  #6

  • I had Fortis short term disability insurance through my employer. In January 2001 I was in an automobile accident and was subsequently unable to work. I did received my disability payments from Fortis at that time. In November of 2001 I was in another auto accident and again unable to work. I filed the appropriate paperwork but this time I was told I did not quality (I don’t remember any specific reason being given), how do you not qualify? Even my doctor was astonished. I am to this day still disabled and I am still being treated for back pain. How can they do this?

    Linda K.Oct 18, 2015  #5

  • Theresa,

    You are certainly not alone in what you are experiencing, especially when it comes to reduction of your monthly benefit on account of the receipt of dependent social security. The only suggestion I can give is to review your policy to determine what are the enumerated sources of Other Income subject to offset your monthly benefit in order to make sure they are entitled to the dependent social security.

    Stephen JessupJul 14, 2014  #4

  • After 23 years of getting payments I have a client who had been told by a Fortis representative last month around the first of June 2014,” This is your last Long Term Disability Check you will never get another from us and do not call us ever again”. Then they abruptly hung up the phone. She was a state of Arizona FAA-CPS worker whom got injured on the job. I can not seem to find the actual contract which would have governed over her employment and STD/LTD insurance on line form 1990 when she started working there.

    This client followed all the rules and procedures was told to file for SSD and did so. She went all the way to a hearing and got denied at that level in front of an ALJ. She does not remember the year nor the reason for denial in the SSD case. She can not recall the name of the Lawyer (only that it was a man) she had in the hearing so I can’t even contact him to maybe get a copy of her records if he kept them from so long ago.

    Any help to find the actual contract and to see if there was a limitation which stated the benefits would end at a certain age or amount paid in benefits or I do not know even what else could cause her to loose the long term disability she has been getting for over 20 years. They gave no written notice or explanation they just stopped the checks. If you have assistance or help or would like to speak to this client I am assisting in filing for SSD/SSI once again, because I have no experience in LTD from so long ago please feel free to contact me.

    Theresa FalzoneJul 13, 2014  #3

  • Dana,

    If your doctor will not cooperate you need to treat with a new doctor or you need to offer to pay your doctor to complete the forms. If you have been denied your disability benefits, then you need to submit additional medical support in your appeal. You can see a new doctor and submit additional support for your short term disability claim.

    Gregory DellAug 8, 2011  #2

  • I’m being denied short term disability payments because my primary care physician neglects to turn in the paperwork on time. I’m a single mother, all he has to do is sign the wretched for within a 2 week period and now I cant pay rent. I’m a single mom after my husband has passed in 2009. Is this a neglect of duty of care? I live in Michigan. I’ve researched current statutues and cannot find if his neglect to file the paperwork on time, causes me diress and financial suffering?

    DanaAug 5, 2011  #1

FAQ

Do you help Assurant claimants nationwide?

We represent Assurant clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Assurant disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Assurant. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Assurant.

How do you help Assurant claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Assurant long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Assurant:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews   *****

Anthony M.

My experience with Mr. Dell and all of the staff working at the practice has been an excellent experience. Planning to make a claim for disability with a private insurance company can be very intimidating for the average person. Mr. Dell is professional and sharp, just what I was looking for in an attorney to represent my case. He walked me through every step and helped me make the best application for benefits. There were absolutely no surprises while applying for my benefits as we were both well prepared for any questions that could arise during the process. Mr. Dell was able to work with me and my physicians to make sure the application was thorough and complete. No mistakes were made along the way and my benefits were approved without any problems whatsoever. I will truly be grateful for Mr. Dell for the rest of my life.

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us