Johnson&Johnson Employee with Depression Denied Disability Benefits After Definition Change
This Johnson & Johnson disability denial lawsuit and its result shows why an experienced disability attorney is often needed prior to a disability claim denial. If the claimant in this case had hired a representative earlier in the case to assist her with her claim and administrative appeals, there is a chance that the court would have had more medical documentation in support of her claim and thus perhaps resulting in a more favorable ruling.
Employee Forced to Leave Work Due to Depression
In February 2008, an employee of Johnson & Johnson was forced to leave work due to depression. She immediately applied for and was approved for Short Term Disability Benefits. As the claim was transitioning from a short-term claim to a long-term claim, Reed Group, the third party administrator of Johnson & Johnson’s disability policies, had the claimant undergo an independent medical examination by a psychologist. After initially being awarded Long Term Disability Benefits, Reed Group denied continued benefits in September of 2008 because the initial reviewing psychologist found that the claimant was exaggerating her symptoms and gave a poor effort throughout testing.
The Claimant filed an administrative appeal. As the appeal was pending, Reed Group had a board certified psychiatrist conduct an independent review. That reviewing physician concluded that the claimant was not able to work in any capacity. In light of this opinion, LTD Benefits were reinstated on October 13, 2008.
In March of 2009, a third evaluation was conducted whereby the doctor concluded that the claimant was not able to return to work in any capacity. The Social Security Administration agreed and awarded disability benefits to the claimant.
Change in Definition of Disability Results in Disability Denial by Reed Group
In the spring of 2009, the definition of disability changed in the policy. The earlier definition of disability stated that the claimant had to be unable to perform her job. The new definition required that she be unable to perform any job in order to qualify for continued disability benefits. It must be noted that the change in definition of disability is very common and found in the great majority of today’s ERISA disability policies.
In light of the higher standard the claimant now needed to meet, Reed Group reinvestigated the claimant’s case. In May of 2009, the claimant was sent to a Psychologist for an independent medical examination. Following this IME, Reed Group terminated the claimant’s continued receipt of benefits. Apparently this psychologist found that the claimant’s subjective complaints could not be objectively verified.
The claimant again appealed. In response to this appeal, Reed Group had the claimant’s file reviewed by an independent reviewing psychologist. Relying on this “independent review”, Reed Group upheld its decision to deny benefits on October 12, 2009.
Two months after the latest denial, the claimant retained counsel to assist her with her final administrative appeal. This focus of the administrative appeal was the initial independent reviews that found that the claimant was not able to work in any capacity. In response to this appeal, Reed Group submitted the entire file to another psychologist for another independent evaluation. Using this review for support, Reed Group again denied the claimant’s claim. Reed Group also stated that the reports the claimant points to in her appeal addressed an earlier time period.
Following this final denial, a lawsuit ensued.
ERISA Disability Lawsuit Filed Against Johnson & Johnson and Reed Group
Without further administrative remedies available, the claimant was forced to file an ERISA lawsuit. Unfortunately for the claimant, the ERISA statutes severely handcuff the Federal Court in ERISA Claims. In fact, even if a federal court believes the decision to deny benefits was wrong, “the ultimate question… is whether reasonable ground supported that decision; in other words, whether Johnson & Johnson’s decision to deny (claimant’s) benefits was arbitrary and capricious.”
The Court found that Johnson & Johnson’s decision to give more weight to the objective data and the “independent” doctors rather than the claimant’s treating doctors was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Similarly, the Court found Johnson & Johnson’s explanation that the supportive reports the claimant pointed to in her final appeal were from a different time period was reasonable.
In the end, the Court found that Johnson & Johnson’s decision to terminate was reasonable and ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson.
What If…
The facts of this case leave open the question as to how the Court would have ruled if more supportive documentation and objective evidence was presented to the Court by the claimant. Although our firm did not represent the claimant in this case, nor have we had a chance to review all the documentation from the case, the Court’s Order shows that insufficient contrary evidence was presented that could have swayed the Court to have found that Johnson & Johnson’s decision was in fact not reasonable. For instance, if the claimant had an attorney involved sooner other medical examinations, testing, etc., could have been done and presented to combat the “independent” reviews which were paid for by Johnson & Johnson.
If you have a case with similar facts or if you have a claim that is currently under review by a disability insurance company, please contact us so that we may provide you with a complimentary consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Disability Benefit Denial Options
Submit a Strong Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong appeal.
Sue Your Disability Insurance Company
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide.
Protect Your Benefits
Get Your Disability Application Approved
We help claimants throughout the entire application process.
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
We manage every aspect of your disability claim following claim approval.
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Disability Company Reviews
(627)
Showing 8 of 627 Reviews
Sun Life
What a mess
This place has no idea what day it even is. First they attach my claim to my previous claim in which was a new claim. They messed up and denied me then made me wait yet ag... read more >
Reply
Sedgwick
I was disabled 2003 by SS. I got SSDI 7 years too late.
I believe if Sedgwick would have moved on my Claim. They absolutely did everything not to answer my calls, change dates. I had already been through WV comp. Ins. Sold out,... read more >
MetLife
Only care about $$$$$
PLAY THEIR GAME FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.....after getting a copy of the insurance policy from my HR. I nipped a lot of the headaches quickly by calling their bluff word for w... read more >
Reply
Sedgwick
They falsify documents and avoid contact as much as possible.
They avoided sending the documents needed for the claim for two weeks. I had to escalate with a call from my company's HR and Sedgwick (the only way I was ever able to get... read more >
Hartford
This company is a scam!
The Hartford does not pay claims. The Hartford only collects premiums. The Hartford doesn’t care if you are terminally ill. I’ve been employed at my employer since 201... read more >
Prudential
California State Disabilty "OFFSET" never mentioned or outlined when enrolling for STD coverage.
All terms and conditions of receiving a claim benefit not made available when enrolling. Hidden elements of eligibility... not fully transparent with issues that might eff... read more >
Sedgwick
Not getting paid
I been battling Sedgwick about my claim. I was to get paid today and I did not get paid.Sledges is the worse company I ever had to deal with. I been fighting with my b... read more >
Sedgwick
Sedgewich is the worst-immediate denial of all requests for treatment. Rubber stamps DENIED ALL RFA’s
Sedgewich immediately denies all RFA. They’re ur team are THEMSELVES not a independent medical team…
Answered Questions by Our Lawyers
(0)
Helpful Videos
(805)
Showing 12 of 805 Videos
Disability Benefit Tips
(329)
Showing 8 of 329 Benefit Tips
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
When you're seeking disability benefits under a long term disability policy, your medical rec... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
One thing many long term disability claimants don't know about (or expect) from the claims re... Read More >
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Getting a denial letter from your disability insurance company is one of the ultimate insults... Read More >
Disability Denial Reason #2 - Change of Disability Definition & Vocational Review
One of the top reasons for terminating a claimant's long term disability benefits involves th... Read More >
Disability Denial Reason #1 – Paper Review & IME
At Dell Disability Lawyers, we've seen insurance companies give countless reasons to deny lon... Read More >
How to Apply for Reliance Standard Disability Benefits & Top 5 Reasons for a Claim Denial
At Dell & Schaefer we’ve handled hundreds of long term disability insurance claims against Reliance Standard, and have learned a few thi... Read More >
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
At Dell & Schaefer, we've helped hundreds of clients recover long term disability benefit... Read More >
Guardian Disability Benefit Claim Handling Tips
When you finally receive a letter from Guardian Disability informing you that your claim for ... Read More >
Dell Disability Cases
(359)
Showing 8 of 359 Dell Disability Cases
Anesthesiologist Approved for Long Term Disability Benfits Plus an Extra 9 Months of Benefits
Our client, an Anesthesiologist, suffered a fall at his home which resulted in rupturing his ... Read More >
Attorney Alexander Palamara of Dell Disability Lawyers gets LTD Benefits Reinstated for former Walmart Manager who is now found disabled from Any Occupation
A former Manager of Quality Assurance at Walmart is again receiving Long Term Disability (LTD) benefits following an appeal filed by Dell Disa... Read More >
Research Epidemiologist with chronic fatigue / ME wins LTD appeal against Prudential
Our client is a former Mental Health Epidemiologist who unfortunately suffered the progressive onset of perv... Read More >
Executive Director with Meniere's Denied Long Term Disability Insurance Benefits By Hartford
Our client, came to us when he was unjustly denied his claim for LTD benefits by Aetna, now Hartford, assert... Read More >
Lincoln Approves Long Term Disability Benefits After Four Year Fight
With financial protections afforded to disability insurance companies under ERISA that insulate them from extra contractual damages there is v... Read More >
Cigna Sued For Failing To Make A Timely Decision on Appeal
If your disability insurance claim has ever been denied you will have received a formal denial letter from your insurance carrier in which you... Read More >
Lincoln National LTD Denial for Pre-Existing Condition Reversed on Appeal
On December 8th of 2020, a new employee at ServerCentral, now known as Deft, a well-known IT ... Read More >
Illinois Mutual terminates benefits for Tire Kingdom Service Manager After Review By Hired Physician
Our client was a service manager for Tire Kingdom, due to years of working on his feet he dev... Read More >
Disability Lawsuit Stories
(763)
Reviews from Our Clients
