Mechanic Loses Claim For Benefits Against Reliance Standard After Employer Makes Oral Misrepresentations Concerning Disability Insurance Coverage
Generally, when employees have a question concerning their employer provided group long-term disability insurance coverage, the first place they turn is to their HR department. HR Departments are not in the business of underwriting, or interpreting insurance policies, and often do not have the adequate knowledge to competently answer specific questions concerning the terms and conditions of the disability insurance plan. They can, and should provide the employees with the long-term disability plan documents, and enrollment information, but beyond those tasks, should not be relied upon to answer questions concerning eligibility and coverage. It is important to know that, although the employer may be liable to its employee, as a fiduciary, misrepresentations made by an HR representative concerning plan coverage will not trump the terms and conditions of the long-term disability plan itself, and no liability will be placed on the long-term disability insurance company.
Employer Misrepresents Coverage Provided Through Group Long-term Disability Insurance Plan
Recently, the U.S. District Court for North Carolina, dismissed an action brought by a former maintenance mechanic against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, and his employer, US Cotton, for benefits which he claimed were owed under the his employer provided group long-term disability insurance plan.
Robert Breyan was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), a degenerative lung condition that impedes the ability to breathe. Mr. Breyan was advised by his doctors that he should maintain all of the disability insurance available to him, as his condition was not expected to improve, and that he would likely, one day, need to file a disability claim. Mr. Breyan maintained a private disability insurance policy, and also purchased coverage through the Reliance Standard long-term disability insurance plan, offered through US Cotton. On multiple occasions, Mr. Breyan was misinformed and assured by human resources at US Cotton that the Reliance Standard plan would provide him with 60% of his annual income. They failed to inform him of any possible reductions or offsets for other disability income benefits, such as Social Security disability, nor did they provide him with a summary plan description, describing the terms of the plan.
Due to his COPD, Mr. Breyan was eventually forced to file a long-term disability claim with Reliance Standard. Mr. Breyan’s claim with Reliance Standard was quickly approved, and shortly thereafter, he was approved for social security disability benefits as well. Mr. Breyan then learned that Reliance Standard had overpaid his claim, due to his receipt of social security disability benefits, and that it was reducing his monthly benefits by the monthly amount he was receiving from social security disability.
Mr. Breyan sued both Reliance Standard and his employer for wrongfully denying his disability benefits. Specifically, he claimed that he was due the amount that the human resources employees informed him he would receive, sixty percent of his salary until retirement age – without being reduced or offset by receipt of any other disability income benefits.
The U.S. District Court found that, although US Cotton induced Mr. Breyan to believe that the benefits he would receive would not be reduced or offset by other payments such as social security disability benefits, the law is clear, the plan documents rule. The court found that the oral representations, or misrepresentations, were immaterial as to the question of whether the benefits promised under the terms of the plan were denied.
Although the court dismissed the claim for wrongful denial of benefits against Reliance Standard, it allowed Mr. Breyan to maintain a claim against him employer, US Cotton, for breach of fiduciary duty. The court found that it is plausible for Mr. Breyan to show that US Cotton breached its fiduciary duty to him by not just misinforming him, but also by failing to comply with its affirmative duty to inform when it knew that silence might be harmful.
You can read about more cases with Reliance Standard on this page.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Reliance Standard Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Reliance Standard Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Reliance Standard Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Reliance Standard denied my LTD benefits because COVID-19 limited my ability to provide proof of continued disability.
Reliance Standard cut off my LTD benefits claiming I'm fit enough to work even though I'm more sick than before.
I was receiving LTD from Reliance Standard due to breast cancer until they suddenly denied me my benefits.
Reliance Standard never answers or returns my calls, has not provided me my benefits, and falsely claims I never provided necessary paperwork.
The appeals process with Reliance Standard is very frustrating. I'm not sure how to get an answer from them.
Reliance Standard is trying to reduce my LTD benefits because of once-a-month work in the military reserve.
Q: Do I have to provide additional proof of my disability that's specifically requested by Reliance Standard?
Q: If I'm not receiving the SSDI benefits for my children from Reliance Standard due to custody, should my SSDI benefits increase?
Reliance Standard overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for Texas Retail Store Manager
Reliance Standard overturns decision to deny long-term disability benefits to Paediatrician with Ovarian Cancer
Reliance Standard Reinstates Benefits for Former Employee of Parent Company, Delphi Financial, Following Successful Appeal
Reliance Standard Overturns Denial of Benefits on Appeal After Claiming It Failed to Receive Medical Records
After sending claimant to a psychiatric IME, Reliance Standard realizes its decision to deny benefits was incorrect
Reliance's Termination of Disability Benefits was Arbitrary and Capricious When it Discounted Supporting Medical Evidence Without Reason
District Court Holds That Reliance Standard Did Not Properly Consider Whether Traveling Nurse Could Perform The Material Duties Of Her Regular Occupation
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.