Employees of Staples & Nortel Networks among Four Plaintiffs To Sue Prudential For Wrongful Denial Of Long-Term Disability Benefits
The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) had four different lawsuits filed against it by four Plaintiffs in the District Courts of South Carolina (2 cases), New York, and West Virginia. In all four cases filed via the respective Plaintiffs’ disability lawyers, Prudential is accused of wrongfully denying or terminating the Plaintiffs’ claims for long-term disability benefits as promised under their respective plans and by ERISA.
The First South Carolina Case
In Daniel J. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff was employed with Staples until 2002. This employment allowed the Plaintiff to receive long-term disability benefits via a plan that was fully insured by Prudential. Plaintiff became disabled due to certain problems from which he suffered, forcing him to cease working.
The Plaintiff filed a disability application for long-term disability benefits as defined by the terms of the Plan, but Prudential denied his claim. Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, requesting the specific information that led to Prudential’s initial denial. Prudential never responded to this request, nor to the two subsequent requests made by the Plaintiff for this information. Due to Prudential not responding to any requests, Plaintiff had no choice but to file this lawsuit against Prudential.
The Second South Carolina Case
In Harold G. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff was employed by Agrifos Fertilizer, Inc. This employment enabled Plaintiff to be provided with long-term disability coverage via a plan that was fully insured by Prudential. Plaintiff became disabled due to certain problems, leading to his inability to work and filing a claim for long-term disability benefits.
Prudential denied the Plaintiff’s claim. Plaintiff appealed the denial, but Prudential denied the appeal. Plaintiff has exhausted all administrative remedies and has filed this lawsuit against Prudential.
The New York Case
In Sharon G. v. The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America, the Plaintiff was employed by Nortel Networks, which provided its employees with long-term disability benefits via a plan that was originally funded by CIGNA Life Insurance Company. Prudential eventually became the entity that funded this plan.
Plaintiff became disabled in October 1993, leading to her filing a claim for long-term disability benefits. Prudential initially paid benefits from the time period of 26 weeks after the initial claim was filed (the “elimination period”) through October 31, 2009, but the claim was then terminated from October 31, 2009 to the present day.
Plaintiff filed an appeal of this termination, supplying evidence that her LTD benefits should continue. This included evidence of her suffering from fibromyalgia, SLE, Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis, migraine headaches and cognitive limitations, which allowed the Plaintiff to receive Social Security Disability benefits from October 22, 1993 to the present day.
Despite this evidence, Prudential denied the appeal. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies and has filed this lawsuit against Prudential.
The West Virginia Case
In Terry L. v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, American Electric Power System Long-Term Disability Plan (American Electric), and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Plaintiff was employed by American Electric, which made him eligible for disability benefits via the long-term disability plan that was funded by Prudential.
On or about May 16, 2009, Plaintiff became totally disabled and unable to continue working at American Electric. Plaintiff filed for long-term disability benefits, which Prudential initially granted through May 16, 2011. However, from May 17, 2011 to the present date, Prudential terminated further LTD benefits.
Plaintiff, along with his physician, filed a timely appeal of this denial. On or about March 8, 2011, Prudential informed Plaintiff that his appeal was denied. Plaintiff again appealed, and again, Prudential denied this appeal via letter dated October 11, 2011. Due to this denial being declared as the final denial, Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies and has filed this lawsuit against Prudential.
Lawsuits Seek The Following Relief
In the four previously mentioned cases, Plaintiffs want the following relief to be granted by the Courts against Prudential:
- The payment of all owed long-term disability benefits, along with accrued interest that is due
- The reinstatement of all future long-term disability benefits so long as the Plaintiffs remain eligible under the respective terms of their individual Plans
- The payment of all attorneys’ fees
- The payment of all court costs associated with these lawsuits against Prudential
- The payment of all other relief that the Courts find to be proper and just
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Prudential Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Prudential Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Prudential Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Prudential told me I would have a decision today, and now the need another week. Guess what, I'm still broke
Q: My mother paid many years for a long-term care policy. When she had to be put in an assisted care facility, Prudential won't pay. Do you accept cases like this?
Q: Can I sue my PRUDENTIAL LTD for the cost of hiring a disability attorney to get my benefits reinstated?
Q: Is it best to hire an attorney first and then file a complaint with Indiana Insurance License Board or do both? How long does it usually take to resolve a case like this?
If I File A Short Term Disability Claim With My Carrier And My Claim Is Denied, Do I Also Need To File A Separate Long Term Disability Claim?
Can the disability company limit my disability benefits to 24 months if I have been diagnosed with depression as a result of my physical disability?
Federal ERISA Lawsuit Filed Against Prudential After It Denies Long-term Disability Benefits to Insured With Parkinson's Disease
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.