Principal Reinstates Benefits of Orthopedic Surgeon Unable to Work Full-Time After Attorney Rachel Alters submits Appeal

Dr. S is 47-year-old left hand dominant Orthopedic Surgeon who was forced to stop working full-time effective May 2, 2016, due to progressively worsening left arm pain which significantly impacted his ability to perform the material and substantial duties of his occupation on a sustained basis. He has a well-documented history of degenerative disc disease, spondylosis with C5-6 neuroforaminal stenosis, and C6 radiculopathy confirmed by EMG studies.

Dr. S was initially treated on August 13, 2015, with complaints of left arm pain which had progressively worsened over the prior three months. He reported the pain radiated from his left posterior shoulder, trapezius, posterior triceps, down his radial forearm to his left thumb, a pattern consistent with C6 dermatome. The pain was described as severe tingling, pins, and needles and rated it as 7 out of 10. The pain significantly affected his quality of life, daily activities, and job function. Physical examination demonstrated Dr. S to have positive Spurling’s and shoulder abduction tests. In addition, the range of motion of his cervical spine was limited due to pain. MRI studies performed confirmed multi-level degenerative changes, with central spinal and neural foraminal stenosis at C3-C6 and at C5-6, broad-based disc osteophyte complex with uncovertebral/facet arthropathy, left sided bulge and foraminal narrowing worse than the right side. Based on Dr. S’s physical and diagnostic examination findings, it was determined that he was a good candidate for surgical intervention and an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at C5-6 was recommended. However, as Dr. S feared the possibility of losing the ability to continue practicing orthopedic surgery, he was hesitant to proceed with surgery.

Dr. S continued working while enduring significant pain. It was very painful for him to work a full clinic day as he had to be in a static position lifting and using his arms repetitively for surgery. This repetitive movement, performed continuously throughout the work day, significantly aggravated his symptoms. Therefore, his treating doctor restricted him to activity modification to include avoiding repetitive bending and lifting. He also advised him to lighten his workload, to reduce it by 30%. He was approved for Residual disability benefits with Sun Life and continued to work on a reduced schedule as recommended by his physician.

Sun Life Terminated Benefits Based on Biased Peer Review Physician Opinion and Surveillance

Sun Life improperly terminated Dr. S’s benefits based primarily on a biased medical opinion received from its peer review physician and the footage of insignificant surveillance which purportedly showed Dr. S hitting tennis balls at an indoor tennis facility for no more than eight minutes on two separate occasions. Without the benefit of examining Dr. S, the peer review doctor baselessly concluded, that Dr. S had no reasonable restrictions and/or limitations. He utilized the surveillance footage as a basis for this illogical assessment as if hitting balls for no more than 8 minutes equated to an ability to perform the precise and challenging occupation of an orthopedic surgeon on a full-time basis. The courts have longed ruled that heavy emphasis on surveillance was an abuse of discretion, finding it unreasonable to extrapolate from a brief video (15 minutes in this case) a conclusion that one was capable of working on a full-time basis (see Lalli v. Hartford Ins. Co. No. 1:10-cv-00152, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23312 and Hanusik v. Hartford Life Ins. Co. No. 06-11258, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7520). Focusing solely on the surveillance footage, it is evident that Sun Life completely ignored the consistent and relevant diagnostic and physical examination findings which in fact substantiated and correlated with Dr. S’s severe pain symptomatology and physical limitations.

After receiving Dr. S’s Appeal, Sun Life requires him to attend an IME

According to the physician who performed the IME at Sun Life’s request, he clearly has mild neurological symptoms, a positive Spurling’s test and some mild loss of sensation in a C6 distribution of his left upper extremity. His MRI and EMG findings all indicate a chronic C6 radiculopathy. Functional impairments are: He can sit for 30 minutes at a time for a total of 2 hours in an 8-hour workday. He can stand for 1 hour at a time for a total of 4 hours in an 8-hour workday. He can walk for 1 hour at a time for a total of 4 hours in an 8-hour workday. He can lift/carry/push/pull up to 20lbs occasionally and 10lbs frequently. He can bend, squat, reach and kneel occasionally. He can use both hands for fine manipulation and drive frequently. He can never climb. The IME doctor felt Dr. S’s claim for partial disability was appropriate and the reduced work schedule was necessary in order for him to be able to bear his chronic pain.

Sun Life Determines Its Decision Was Wrong

After Attorney Alters submits a lengthy appeal accompanied by several physicians’ opinions and medical records all supporting the claimant’s inability to work as well as Sun Life’s IME physician’s opinion rendering him partially disabled, Sun Life overturned its denial and reinstated the claimant’s LTD benefits. Attorney Alters will continue to manage the claim to help ensure that his benefits are paid until he is able to return to work full-time.

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you help Principal claimants nationwide?

We represent Principal clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Principal disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Principal. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Principal.

How do you help Principal claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Principal long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Principal:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Michael A., DDS

I have enjoyed my working experience with the firm of Dell & Schaefer. Specifically, upon becoming my attorney, Greg Dell carefully managed all aspects of my case. He took the time to keep me both informed and calm as we navigated the sometimes difficult waters that led to my long term disability claim being approved. In the five years since my application Greg has expediently handled all of the inquiries made by my disability carrier. I feel confident going forward that Greg will ensure that I receive all the benefits to which I am entitled.

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us