Court Orders Principal Life to Reinstate Long Term Disability Benefits
Flaaen v. Principal Life Insurance Company, is a win for the claimant who suffered a severe back injury in August 2005 in his job as a truck driver. In January 2006, Principal granted his application for long term disability benefits since he could no longer perform the regular and substantial duties of his own occupation.
On December 14, 2014, Principal terminated Flaaen’s disability benefits on the grounds that he now had to meet the standard of being disabled only if he could not perform “the Substantial and Material Duties of any Gainful Occupation for which he or she is or may reasonably become qualified based on education, training, or experience.” Principal listed several occupations for which it determined Flaaen was qualified.
Flaaen objected, exhausted his administrative remedies and then filed this ERISA lawsuit. In his administrative appeals and in this court action, Flaaen argued that none of the jobs Principal said he could perform were ones he was qualified for. Additionally, even if he was qualified for them, he would be unable to earn an amount equal to or more than his primary monthly benefit payment.
The Court agreed with Flaaen and ordered the long term disability benefits to be reinstated. It also ordered Principal to pay benefits dating back to the termination date of December 14, 2014.
Standard of Review
The Court made it clear that the standard of review in this case made a difference in the outcome. Under the de novo standard, which the Court determined was the proper standard in this case, the Court was charged with reviewing the file to determine “whether Flaaen was disabled in the sense defined in the policy.”
If an arbitrary and capricious standard had applied, the Court would have been required to give deference to the plan administrator’s decision and uphold it if there was a “reasonable explanation, based on the evidence, for that decision.”
Ambiguous Policy Language of “Gainful Occupation” was Interpreted in the Claimant’s Favor
The major dispute in this case involved whether or not the claimant was able to perform the substantial duties of any gainful occupation for which he was trained, educated or in which he had experience. The policy defined “gainful occupation” as one where the claimant “could reasonably be expected to earn an amount equal to or greater than the Primary Monthly Benefit.”
Principal argued that as long as the occupation for which the claimant qualified had the potential of the claimant earning a median wage sometime in the future, it should meet the standard and the claimant should no longer be eligible for benefits.
Flaaen argued that such an interpretation was unreasonable and the clause should mean “what is reasonably likely now, as of the date of denial of his benefits.”
The Court agreed with Flaaen’s interpretation as being the most reasonable, noting that when a clause is subject to two different interpretations, it is ambiguous. Under ERISA, ambiguous clauses are interpreted in a way that favors the claimant.
Occupations Proposed by Principal Did Not Meet the Income Standard Required by the Policy Language
Principal conducted several vocational analyses and listed several different jobs it concluded claimant could perform. Flaaen disagreed and argued that none of them met the income qualifications required by the policy language and he was not even qualified to perform most of them.
The Court found in favor of Flaaen, concluding, “Flaaen has shown that he is currently unable to procure any gainful occupation in any field identified or proposed by Principal.” It also ordered Principal to pay benefits back to the date of termination of benefits.
Dell and Schaefer did not represent the Plaintiff in this case, however our lawyers are available to answer any questions you may have regarding your disability claim.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Principal Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Principal Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Principal Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Principal is absolutely ridiculous. I'm in financial harship after not receibing my full pay from work and exhausting my long term sick
Q: Can Principal deduct my social security payment from my monthly Principal disability benefit payment?
Q: What is the difference between time period of the claim while approved and the time period of the claim while denied?
Q: Will Principal harass me if I don't accept their buyout? And, is it standard for a buyout to be lower than the full benefit paid over time?
Q: Can Principal take away my deceased husband's 3 month survivor benefit? They justified it saying he was eligible for SSDI when he didn't even apply.
Stephen Jessup and Gregory Dell discuss their experience in handling claims with Principal Financial
After Principal Denies Continued Disability Benefits, Attorney Alexander Palamara Gets Claim Reinstated for a Vienna Beef Employee
Principal reinstates benefits of Orthopedic Surgeon unable to work full-time after Attorney Rachel Alters submits Appeal
Dell Disability Lawyers Successfully Appeals Denial Of Benefits To Claimant With Trigeminal Neuralgia
Administrative Appeal by Dell Disability Lawyers forces Principal to Reinstate ERISA Long Term Disability Claim of Former Healthways, Inc. Employee
Principal Life denies disability benefits to a physician and then seeks attorney fees after physician's disability denial is affirmed by Texas Judge
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.