Statute of Limitations Provision In Disability Policy Enforceable under ERISA
What is a Statute of Limitations?
The Statute of Limitations is the amount of time allowed under the law in which a plaintiff can bring a lawsuit. ERISA does not specify a statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit within the language of the statute. As such, insurance companies often write a statute of limitations provision into the policy, the most common being a three year statute of limitations. The statute of limitation provision usually indicates that the insured has three years from the date “proof of loss is required” in order to bring suit. Until recently there was a split amongst various courts as to when the “Proof of Loss” requirement is triggered.
ERISA’s Take on the Statute of Limitations
As a general matter, the statute of limitations begins to run when the action “accrues” or when the plaintiff can file a lawsuit to obtain relief. However, under ERISA the insured must undergo and exhaust all administrative remedies (appeals) prior to filing a disability lawsuit. In the case of Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company, the Supreme Court determined that ERISA governed group disability policies can contain a Statute of Limitations provision that begins prior to the right to bring lawsuit. This is in contrast to the above stated general rule of a statute of limitations and serves as yet another example of how ERISA has a set of rules unlike any other area of the law.
In the Heimeshoff case, the statute of limitations enumerated in the policy was three years from the date proof of loss was required. In the underlying Court case, Hartford argued that Heimeshoff’s right to bring lawsuit was barred as she brought suit more than three years after proof of loss was required. Hartford argued that under the policy the statute of limitations began to run as of the date that Heimeshoff’s claim was initially denied by Hartford. Heimeshoff disagreed and argued that the statute of limitations to bring suit did not begin until the date of the final denial of benefits by Hartford. In deciding the case the District Court presiding over the matter and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals both sided with Hartford’s position, barring Heimeshoff’s right to bring a lawsuit of a denial of benefits under ERISA. In reviewing the lower court decisions the Supreme Court affirmed.
When “Proof of Loss” Begins
As discussed in the above case, your “deadline” with which to file a lawsuit under an ERISA disability insurance policy begins as of the date of the initial denial of benefits by the insurance company. This means that while you are going through the administrative appeal process with the insurance company your right to bring a lawsuit has already begun. Using the standard three year statute of limitations, if the administrative appeal process takes one year from the date of the initial denial of benefits this means that you would have 2 years to file your lawsuit. Many people wait to contact an attorney about filing a lawsuit under ERISA a year or two after exhausting all administrative remedies. This in turn could result in them being barred from ever bringing lawsuit.
Each disability insurance policy contains unique policy language. As such it is important to be aware of the provisions that may affect your legal rights to bring suit. If your claim has been denied and your only remaining option is to file a lawsuit under ERISA please feel free to contact our office to determine how we may be able to assist you.
Attorneys Dell and Schaefer did not represent or have any role in the Heimeshoff case.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Hartford Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Hartford Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Hartford Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: My employer terminated me 11/14/23 while my LTD claim is being appealed by the Hartford. Does my appeals process get terminated as well?
Hartford Denies Disability Benefits To Home Depot Employee 3 Weeks Before Change of Disability Definition
Court Finds Video Surveillance Renders Claimant’s Self-Reporting Unreliable and Upholds Hartford’s Termination of LTD Benefits
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.