New Department of Labor Regulations for ERISA Disability Claims
Over the past few months we have been seeing an increase in denial letters from various insurance companies that contain information not previously seen. This information includes a notice of claimant rights written in multiple languages, and in the case of final denials of benefits the notification to claimants of the exact date the Statute of Limitations to bring a lawsuit under ERISA to seek one’s benefits will expire. The inclusion of these items was an early rollout by various insurance companies in advance of the Department of Labor’s new disability claim regulations set to take effect on April 1, 2018.
From the perspective of a plaintiff’s attorney representing people trying to secure disability insurance benefits, there are two key regulation changes that we believe are most beneficial to the claimant/insured: the “Right to Review and Respond to New Information Before Final Decision” and “Deemed Exhaustion of Claims and Appeal Processes.” These changes are a direct result of the efforts by plaintiffs’ attorneys to convince Courts for the need of such changes.
First, and the most important as it relates to the administrative appeal process is the right of the insured while their claim is under an administrative appeal review by the insurance carrier to review any new evidence created by the insurance carrier during the appeal review process and respond to same. The Department of Labor states:
Right to Review and Respond to New Information Before Final Decision. The final rule prohibits plans from denying benefits on appeal based on new or additional evidence or rationales that were not included when the benefit was denied at the claims stage, unless the claimant is given notice and a fair opportunity to respond.
The “new evidence” addressed is assuredly meant to target at any medical reviews conducted at the request of the insurance company in response to the insured’s administrative appeal. Prior to this formal change in regulation an insurance company did not have to provide the insured with a copy of any new information and/or medical review reports created during the appeal review. This in turn prevented an insured from being able to respond to the opinion(s) of the insurance company’s doctor(s). Although some insurance companies have commonly provided medical review reports to an insured with a request that the insured’s doctors respond to same before a final decision is rendered, it is now a requirement. It appears that gone are the days when an insurance company can deny an administrative appeal without affording a claimant the right to respond to the very medical opinions that the company is relying on to deny their appeal.
The second regulation change that greatly expands the rights of the insured is a requirement by the insurance company to strictly adhere to claims procedures. Per the Department of Labor:
Deemed Exhaustion of Claims and Appeal Processes. If plans do not adhere to all claims processing rules, the claimant is deemed to have exhausted the administrative remedies available under the plan, unless the violation was the result of a minor error and other specified conditions are met. If the claimant is deemed to have exhausted the administrative remedies available under the plan, the claim or appeal is deemed denied on review without the exercise of discretion by a fiduciary and the claimant may immediately pursue his or her claim in court. The final rule also provides that the plan must treat a claim as re-filed on appeal upon the plan’s receipt of a court’s decision rejecting the claimant’s request for review.
This change is intended to overturn years of case law, which had determined that only “substantial compliance” with the regulations was required. This requirement to strictly adhere to claims procedures could open the door to claimants being able to terminate the claims process and file a lawsuit to determine if an error occurred and whether the error on the part of the insurance company was more than minor. According to the Department of Labor, if the error is deemed to be more than minor then the deference a Court may normally provide to the insurance carrier will no longer be in place and the insured’s claim would be entitled to a “de novo” review. In ERISA litigation a de novo review is the best standard of review an insured can obtain. However, it will remain to be seen how Courts address this regulation change as it conflicts with case law in many jurisdictions as well as case law set forth by the Supreme Court. Regardless, this regulation change will help guarantee that insurance companies will comply with claims procedures and hopefully end the seemingly endless delay tactics many companies employ when rendering a decision on a claim.
It remains to be seen if the Department of Labor’s regulation changes will make a noticeable impact to the benefits of insureds and claimants, but the fact that changes are being made is a step in the right direction to protect insured’s rights under ERISA governed disability insurance policies. For more information about the regulation changes, please feel free to review the Department of Labor’s fact sheet regarding same.
If you are currently on disability or thinking about filing a disability claim and wanted to know how these regulation changes affect you, please do not hesitate to reach out to speak to one of our disability insurance attorneys.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Attorney Alexander Palamara of Dell Disability Lawyers gets LTD Benefits Reinstated for former Walmart Manager who is now found disabled from Any Occupation
NFL Disability Review Board Ignores Evidence of Disability and Appeal Court Reverses Lower Court Decision
California Federal Judge Orders Standard Insurance Company to Pay Disability Benefits to Teacher with Lyme Disease
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.