Dentist sues disability insurance carrier, third party administrator and allegedly independent medical examiner as a result of their conspiracy and bad faith actions to wrongfully deny disability benefits

In 2003, Dr. Morrow, a Dentist stopped working and sold his practice as result of suffering from anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. In order to determine if Dr. Morrow was eligible for disability benefits, Boston Mutual, his disability carrier, hired Disability Reinsurance Management Service, Inc.(hereinafter known as “DRMS”) to administer and handle the claim. This means that DRMS was given the authority to investigate the claim and make a final decision as to whether Dr. Morrow should be paid disability benefits. It is a common practice for disability insurance companies to hire another company such as DRMS to handle a disability claim.

In July of 2003, DRMS determined that Dr. Morrow could not perform his duties as a dentist and approved his claim for long-term disability benefits. In February 2006, DRMS wanted to hire an allegedly independent Doctor to review Dr. Morrow’s file and speak with Dr. Morrow’s treating physicians. DRMS hired a company known as BMI, which in turn hired Dr. Kilburn to complete a review of Dr. Morrow’s file. Dr. Kilburn completed her review and determined that Dr. Morrow was capable of returning to dentistry and that he did not have any functional limitations or restrictions. Despite, Dr. Kilburn’s report, the Boston Mutual continued to pay Dr. Morrow his disability benefits.

Even though Dr. Morrow continued to receive his disability benefits, he filed a lawsuit on the basis that Boston Mutual and its claim administrator (DRMS) engage in a “claim termination scheme,” in which they hire biased medical professionals to recommend the denial or termination of disability claims payments. Dr. Morrow further alleged that had he not uncovered the scheme of Boston Mutual and DRMS, then his claim would have been denied in June 2006. Dr. Morrow also alleged in his Complaint that the negative review of his file injured him because he “must now live in a constant state of uncertainty ass to whether Boston Mutual may decide to arbitrarily cancel his benefits at some point in the future,” and that this has “further exarcerbated his already frail mental health.”

In 2007, Dr. Morrow filed his lawsuit against Boston Mutual, DRMS, BMI, and Dr. Kilburn. The case is currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The Complaint listed six causes of action which included: breach of contract, bad faith, aiding and abetting bad faith, civil conspiracy, tortious interference with prospective advantage, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court has recently dismissed Dr. Morrow’s allegations for intentional infliction of emotional distress and tortious interference with prospective advantage. The court has acknowledged the Defendant’s bad faith conduct and has allowed all of the other counts to remain.

Practical Note: This is a great case in support of claimants. This case will hopefully make disability carriers think long and hard about participating in unethical schemes to deny disability claims.

Leave a comment or ask us a question

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Leroy A.

I was referred to Dell & Schaefer after several years of dealing with my private disability insurance company and their refusal to pay me. Many law firms refused to take my case as it was not a Social Security Disability case. I retained another law firm prior to Dell & Schaefer and they were not able to get me paid. I was lucky to find Dell & Schaefer. They were able to settle with the disability insurance company to my satisfaction and recover disability benefits for me.

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us