Ladenburg Thalmann Branch Manager suffering from injured back sues CIGNA for denial of disability benefits
A disability attorney recently filed a federal ERISA lawsuit against the CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York (CIGNA). The Plaintiff was forced to file suit after CIGNA repeatedly denied her disability claim.
The Facts of the Case Against CIGNA Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff suffered injuries that included bulging and herniated disks in her back in January 2004. She was examined and treated until it was determined that surgery was needed, resulting in her having a laminectomy to L4-L5 on March 21, 2005. This surgery was unsuccessful, which led to spinal fusion on L4-L5 on April 4, 2005.
After recovery from the above procedure, Plaintiff was hired as a Class I salaried employee by Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. on a full-time basis on or about June 15, 2005. Plaintiff was hired as a “Registered Representative and Branch Manager of Portfolio Management, Private Client Services.”
This job required her to do the following tasks:
- Generally travel between 3 to 4 hours each day to go to and from work, as well as work between the hours of 8 A.M. to 6 P.M. on all Mondays through Fridays when the stock market was open
- Be required to be at her desk and computer and/or on the telephone between the market hours of 9:30 A.M. to 4 P.M. because of her role as a licensed registered representative and her role in portfolio management
Plaintiff had a Long-Term Disability Insurance Benefits Plan that was insured and administered by CIGNA. She became fully covered by this plan according to its terms on or about January 1, 2006.
On or about May 19, 2006, Plaintiff became totally disabled due to what was diagnosed as failed back syndrome.
On June 7, 2006, Plaintiff filed notice and proof of claim for disability benefits with The Hartford, which was the short-term disability insurance carrier for LTC. This disability insurance covered Plaintiff for the first 180 days of disability. The period where she received payments was from May 27, 2006 to November 24, 2006.
On November 23, 2006, Plaintiff filed an application for LTD benefits; the application that included “Proof of Loss” did not define exactly what proof of loss or when it was due.
Denial of CIGNA Disability Benefits Claim
On January 2, 2007, CIGNA denied Plaintiff’s claim on the basis of the Policy’s pre-existing condition provision.
Plaintiff appealed that decision by letter via certified mail on February 14, 2007.
Social Security Disability Benefits were awarded to Plaintiff on April 29, 2007.
On June 27, 2007, the New York State (NYS) Court of Appeals ruled that N.Y. Insurance Law Section 3234(a)(2) “allowed insurers to limit benefits during the first 12 months of coverage, but not permit them to deny all benefits for disabilities stemming from preexisting conditions and arising during that 12-month period.”
On July 31, 2007, after the 90 days allowed by the ruling, CIGNA reaffirmed its prior denial of LTD Insurance Benefits based upon Plaintiff’s pre-existing condition.
On October 11, 2007, Plaintiff requested a review of that decision.
On October 29, 2007, defying the NYS Court of Appeals ruling, CIGNA does not accept Plaintiff’s appeal of CIGNA’s previous denial of LTD insurance benefits.
On February 14, 2008, CIGNA recanted its former administrative claim position about the policy’s pre-existing condition provision as a basis for the denial of disability benefits and due to the NYS Court of Appeals ruling would request additional information to determine if Plaintiff was disabled and entitled to LTD insurance benefits.
CIGNA took 493 days longer than allowed by ERISA to request for more medical information from the Plaintiff and to receive an Independent Peer Review from a board certified physician. Michael J. Sukoff, M.D., (Sukoff) a physician licensed to practice in California expressed his opinion that Plaintiff was able to return to work and that her pain syndrome was not supported by all examinations. This opinion differed from every other physician who submitted a report to CIGNA.
Based on Sukoff’s review, CIGNA refused the claim of the Plaintiff and advised her that she can submit a written appeal within 180 days to appeal this decision.
Plaintiff submitted appeal and submitted documents regarding her right knee, right hand, lumbar spine, carpal tunnel surgery on right hand, discography of lumbar, cervical spine, and 2 epidural injections to the cervical spine.
CIGNA upheld its decision to deny Plaintiff’s claim on December 11, 2008, again advising her of the option to appeal this decision within 180 days.
Again, Plaintiff appealed, this time via letter on May 24, 2009. She also included the following with her appeal:
- Plaintiff’s physician letter from May 19, 2006
- Physician letter from August 10, 2006
- 6-page Physical Residual Functional Capacity Assessment from April 10, 2007
- All medical tests performed from May 2006 to May 2009
- All medications taken from May 2006, including the amounts prescribed
CIGNA claims that it tried to contact Plaintiff by phone to discuss her appeal, but that the phone number was “no longer in service.” Plaintiff disputes this by stating that the phone has been in service for “more than 14 years.”
On September 2, 2009, CIGNA again affirmed its earlier denial of Plaintiff’s benefits claim and that no further appeals will be considered.
Disability Lawyer Files Lawsuit Against CIGNA
According to the lawsuit, Plaintiff alleged that CIGNA failed to provide the following to the Plaintiff:
- Information requested by the Plaintiff
- All documents pertinent to the denial of Plaintiff’s claim for LTD Benefits, which interfered with and delayed her ability to gather documents to present her position and to prepare a claim against Defendant CIGNA
- Copies of all communications and written notes pertinent to Plaintiff’s claim for benefits involving CIGNA and its Peer Review Physician, Dr. Sukoff
Plaintiff claims that CIGNA committed the following illegal acts:
- Unlawful denial of Policy benefits
- Willfully postponed and delayed handling procedures that prevented Plaintiff from receiving a full and fair review on the merits of her claim, as required by law
- Plaintiff suffering monetary loss and other damages
- Plaintiff delayed in gathering complete information necessary to prepare this claim, increasing attorney’s fees and court costs
- Conflict of interest due to having an adverse financial interest in the outcome of Plaintiff’s claim and exposure to substantial future expense
Relief Sought By The Plaintiff In The CIGNA Lawsuit
Due to CIGNA’s actions, Plaintiff is seeking the following from the Court:
- Declaration that CIGNA failed and/or refused to supply requested information
- Declaration that CIGNA’s willful failure and/or refusal to provide Plaintiff with all pertinent documents interfered with and delayed her ability to gather the necessary documents to present her position and prepare a claim against CIGNA
- Declaration that CIGNA’s requests for extensions of time did not fall under “Special Circumstances,” putting CIGNA in violation of ERISA’s terms of fulfilling requirements for timely submittal of documents to Plaintiff
- Declaration that CIGNA failed to establish and/or follow reasonable claims procedures that would yield a decision on the Plaintiff’s claim
- Declaration that CIGNA violated its LTD Benefits contract with Plaintiff
- Declaration that CIGNA’s actions were unconscionable
- Declaration that CIGNA is responsible for damages that include, but not limited to, past due contractual benefits, future benefits, present and future attorney’s fees, court costs, disbursements, and pre-judgment interest as allowed by law
- Any other and further relief that the Court deems proper and just.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Cigna Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Cigna Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Cigna Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Can I add a physical disability claim to my mental health one without seeing a doctor (hard to get an appointment with COVID)?
What Should a Claimant Expect When Suing Cigna or any Other Disability Company for Long Term Disability Benefits?
Is a Claimant's Complaints of Pain Enough to Qualify for Short or Long Term Disability Insurance Benefits?
Is My Insurance Company Allowed to Take An Offset of My Monthly LTD Benefit for Social Security Benefits My Kids Receive As A Result of My Disability?
Is My "No-Fault" Auto Insurance Settlement an Offset Under My Long Term Disability Insurance Policy?
CIGNA Denies Technology Manager under the Own Occupation Provision & Dell Disability Lawyers Wins Appeal
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.