Eaton Corporation Employee Losses ERISA Disability Insurance Lawsuit as Court Says Ability to Perform Part-Time Works is Ability to Perform Any Occupation
In a case not handled by Attorneys Dell & Schaefer Chartered, a former employee of the Eaton Corporation was dealt what is most likely a final blow in her quest to obtain continued Long Term Disability (LTD) Benefits. Although this case was not handled by our firm and although the case has a somewhat unique definition of disability, we look to it as guidance for our clients and for others who are currently on claim or who have been denied LTD benefits.
The Story of the Eaton Corporation Employee’s Claim
The Eaton Corporation Employee obtained long-term disability insurance through the Eaton Corporation Disability Plan which was designed to pay her 70% of her monthly base pay should she ever be unable to work due to a disability. In January 2008, the employee left work due to a back injury. She was provided disability benefits for the first 24 months of benefits as the policy defined “disability” for that time period as being “totally and continuously unable to perform the essential duties of your regular position with the Company…”
Unfortunately for this employee, and unfortunately for most covered under Group Disability Insurance Policies provided by their Employers, the definition of disability (what it means to be disabled under the policy) changes after 24 months of benefits. After the first 24 months of benefits it became harder for the employee to qualify for LTD benefits as she then had to prove that she was “totally and continuously unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for compensation or profit for which you are, or may become, reasonably well fit by reason of education, training or experience…”
Around the time of this change in definition of disability, most insurance companies begin reviewing the claims to see if the claimants will continue to qualify to receive benefits in light of the more difficult to reach new definition of disability. The Eaton Corporation Disability Plan was no exception and when the change in definition of disability was occurring, they began to order new medical records to assess whether the employee should still be on claim.
Additional medical records where received from the employee’s treating physicians. Unfortunately for the employee, one of her treating doctors noted that she could work on a part-time schedule. Additionally, the Eaton Corporation also had a Transferable Skills Assessment completed and determined that there were occupations she could perform even with her restrictions and limitations. Eaton used this information to deny the employee’s claim.
The Employee filed an administrative appeal challenging Eaton’s decision. However, a file review was conducted by an “independent” orthopedic surgeon that found she could perform a sedentary occupation. Eaton again denied the employee’s claim.
A final administrative appeal was again filed. With its last review, the Eaton Corporation had two independent physicians (an orthopedic surgeon and a neurological surgeon) review her claim and both doctors found that she was not disabled under the terms of the plan. This lead the Plan Administrator, who also reviewed the claim, to again deny the employee’s claim. With no further administrative appeals available, a lawsuit was filed.
The Lawsuit and the Appeals Court Decision
After the District Court ruled in favor of the Eaton Corporation Disability Plan’s decision to deny her continued LTD benefits, the case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Appeals Court noted that since the Policy in question gave the claim administrator discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits and to construe the terms of the plan, then the Courts were limited to review the denial of benefits only to determine if Eaton’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious.”
The “arbitrary and capricious” standard is often used in ERISA disability claims as many of the insurance policies contain these “discretionary” clauses that give the claim administrator the authority to determine eligibility for benefits and to construe the terms of the plan. This is unfortunate for most disability insurance lawsuits as this standard makes it more difficult for the employees to win their lawsuits. This is because this standard is the least demanding form of judicial review. This means that the courts must give great deference to the claim administrator’s decision and only overturn it if the result is unreasonable. Thus a decision to deny will be upheld if it results from a deliberate principle reasoning process. If there is a reasonable explanation based on the evidence, the claim administrator’s decision must be upheld by the courts.
In this particular instance, the Court found that the records of the employee’s own treating physicians coupled with the reviews of the independent doctors provided ample support for Eaton Corporation’s reasoned explanation deny her claim. Additionally, the Court noted that it was “not convinced it was irrational to have concluded that an ability to work part time does not meet the definition of totally disabled to engage in any occupation or perform any work for compensation.” The Court continued that “(i)t is reasonable to conclude that an ability to do some work means one is not unable to do “any work.”
Although the language in this policy will be different from languages in other policies, we can learn from this case that a doctor’s note that says you are able to work par-time may be detrimental to your claim if you are in the “any occupation” phase.
If you have been denied or are in fear of getting denied by Prudential, Unum, Cigna or any other disability insurance company, please do not delay and please contact Attorneys Dell & Schaefer for a free consultation and review of your claim.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Disability Benefit Denial Options
Submit a Strong Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong appeal.
Sue Your Disability Insurance Company
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide.
Protect Your Benefits
Get Your Disability Application Approved
We help claimants throughout the entire application process.
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
We manage every aspect of your disability claim following claim approval.
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Disability Company Reviews
(627)
Showing 8 of 627 Reviews
Sun Life
What a mess
This place has no idea what day it even is. First they attach my claim to my previous claim in which was a new claim. They messed up and denied me then made me wait yet ag... read more >
Reply
Sedgwick
I was disabled 2003 by SS. I got SSDI 7 years too late.
I believe if Sedgwick would have moved on my Claim. They absolutely did everything not to answer my calls, change dates. I had already been through WV comp. Ins. Sold out,... read more >
MetLife
Only care about $$$$$
PLAY THEIR GAME FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.....after getting a copy of the insurance policy from my HR. I nipped a lot of the headaches quickly by calling their bluff word for w... read more >
Reply
Sedgwick
They falsify documents and avoid contact as much as possible.
They avoided sending the documents needed for the claim for two weeks. I had to escalate with a call from my company's HR and Sedgwick (the only way I was ever able to get... read more >
Hartford
This company is a scam!
The Hartford does not pay claims. The Hartford only collects premiums. The Hartford doesn’t care if you are terminally ill. I’ve been employed at my employer since 201... read more >
Prudential
California State Disabilty "OFFSET" never mentioned or outlined when enrolling for STD coverage.
All terms and conditions of receiving a claim benefit not made available when enrolling. Hidden elements of eligibility... not fully transparent with issues that might eff... read more >
Sedgwick
Not getting paid
I been battling Sedgwick about my claim. I was to get paid today and I did not get paid.Sledges is the worse company I ever had to deal with. I been fighting with my b... read more >
Sedgwick
Sedgewich is the worst-immediate denial of all requests for treatment. Rubber stamps DENIED ALL RFA’s
Sedgewich immediately denies all RFA. They’re ur team are THEMSELVES not a independent medical team…
Answered Questions by Our Lawyers
(0)
Helpful Videos
(805)
Showing 12 of 805 Videos
Disability Benefit Tips
(329)
Showing 8 of 329 Benefit Tips
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
When you're seeking disability benefits under a long term disability policy, your medical rec... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
One thing many long term disability claimants don't know about (or expect) from the claims re... Read More >
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Getting a denial letter from your disability insurance company is one of the ultimate insults... Read More >
Disability Denial Reason #2 - Change of Disability Definition & Vocational Review
One of the top reasons for terminating a claimant's long term disability benefits involves th... Read More >
Disability Denial Reason #1 – Paper Review & IME
At Dell Disability Lawyers, we've seen insurance companies give countless reasons to deny lon... Read More >
How to Apply for Reliance Standard Disability Benefits & Top 5 Reasons for a Claim Denial
At Dell & Schaefer we’ve handled hundreds of long term disability insurance claims against Reliance Standard, and have learned a few thi... Read More >
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
At Dell & Schaefer, we've helped hundreds of clients recover long term disability benefit... Read More >
Guardian Disability Benefit Claim Handling Tips
When you finally receive a letter from Guardian Disability informing you that your claim for ... Read More >
Dell Disability Cases
(360)
Showing 8 of 360 Dell Disability Cases
FPL Lineman Wins Lincoln Disability Denial Appeal
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston improperly denied our client’s long-term disabilit... Read More >
Anesthesiologist Approved for Long Term Disability Benfits Plus an Extra 9 Months of Benefits
Our client, an Anesthesiologist, suffered a fall at his home which resulted in rupturing his ... Read More >
Attorney Alexander Palamara of Dell Disability Lawyers gets LTD Benefits Reinstated for former Walmart Manager who is now found disabled from Any Occupation
A former Manager of Quality Assurance at Walmart is again receiving Long Term Disability (LTD) benefits following an appeal filed by Dell Disa... Read More >
Research Epidemiologist with chronic fatigue / ME wins LTD appeal against Prudential
Our client is a former Mental Health Epidemiologist who unfortunately suffered the progressive onset of perv... Read More >
Executive Director with Meniere's Denied Long Term Disability Insurance Benefits By Hartford
Our client, came to us when he was unjustly denied his claim for LTD benefits by Aetna, now Hartford, assert... Read More >
Lincoln Approves Long Term Disability Benefits After Four Year Fight
With financial protections afforded to disability insurance companies under ERISA that insulate them from extra contractual damages there is v... Read More >
Cigna Sued For Failing To Make A Timely Decision on Appeal
If your disability insurance claim has ever been denied you will have received a formal denial letter from your insurance carrier in which you... Read More >
Lincoln National LTD Denial for Pre-Existing Condition Reversed on Appeal
On December 8th of 2020, a new employee at ServerCentral, now known as Deft, a well-known IT ... Read More >
Disability Lawsuit Stories
(763)
Reviews from Our Clients
