Court Rules for Paul Revere/UNUM and Holds Plaintiff is not Totally Disabled
In Fiorentini v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff Henry Fiorentini, CEO and owner of his own information-technology company Panatech, was granted total disability in 2009 due to problems he had when basal cell carcinoma attacked his right ear. The ear was amputated in 2008.
In 2014, Paul Revere learned Plaintiff had returned to work full-time, assuming his position as CEO, so it terminated his benefits. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for breach of contract in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, alleging that Paul Revere improperly terminated his total disability benefits. The District Court ruled in favor of Paul Revere and Fiorentini appealed.
Fiorentini is Not Disabled Under the Terms of the Disability Contract.
Even though Plaintiff returned to work full-time, he claimed he should still receive disability benefits because he could not do one of the four parts of his occupation. The Appellate Court disagreed, finding that the policy language was unambiguous in its definition of total disability, which said that total disability means “You are unable to perform the important duties of your occupation.”
The appellate court upheld the district court’s ruling, finding that the one part of his job that he said he could not perform was minor. He was still able to “perform all other important duties of his position and to exercise full control of the company.” The policy’s total disability provision did not cover the insured who had “diminished ability to perform his occupation.”
Policy’s “Residual Disability Benefits” Provision Could Have Helped Fiorentini
Paul Revere suggested that Plaintiff apply for residual disability benefits which would have likely helped him. It provided some benefits to those who, like Plaintiff, suffered from a reduced capacity to work, but could still work. Plaintiff refused to apply for these benefits and allowed his policy to lapse.
Facts Did Not Support Plaintiff’s Claim
Although Plaintiff claimed the one portion of his job he could not do was to meet with new clients to convince them to buy his company’s products, he was able to meet face-to-face with continuing clients, renewed his pilot’s license and often flew to meet other recreational pilots for breakfast. He conducted a 90-minute seminar for other flying enthusiasts, and played weekly in an adult hockey league. The court found this evidence did not support his allegations that he could no longer meet with new clients in order to sell them the products of his company, Panatech.
This case was not handled by our office, but we believe it may be helpful to those who can go back to work, but not perform all of their job duties. If you have any questions about this case, or any aspect of your disability claim, contact us for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Unum Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Unum Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Unum Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Does UNUM periodically review Group Long Term Disability Insurance claims/payments? For example, do they verify medical eligibility every five or ten years?
Q: My group long term disability insurance allows me to work part time up to 20% of my pre-disability earnings without affecting my benefit. If I take advantage of this, will Unum use this to deny my benefit?
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, UNUM overturned previous denial of long term disability benefits for South Carolina Nurse
Unum Overturns Original Decision to Deny Benefits to Disabled Account Manager Following Appeal Submitted by Dell Disability Lawyers Appeals Team
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, UNUM overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for Colorado Plumber
Court Rules Plaintiff's Medical Records Was Replete With Evidence Supporting Claim of MS & Was Not A Pre-Existing Condition
After paying for 13 years Unum Denies Disability Benefits to Woman with Lyme Disease and Endometriosis
Inexperienced Lawyer Handles Unum Disability Lawsuit and Fails to Provide Evidence to Support Occupational Argument
Massachusetts court overturns Unum's decision to terminate disability benefits after paying for nearly ten years
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.