Hartford wins long-term disability case based on pre-existing condition defense

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently rendered a very difficult decision in favor of Hartford Insurance Company dealing with the interpretation of pre-existing condition clauses in long-term disability income policies.  The three judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of upholding Hartford’s denial of disability benefits.  The law in each state is different for pre-existing conditions, therefore a disability claimant should consult with a disability insurance attorney prior to filing a claim for benefits.

In the case we are going to consider here, Jay Doroshow v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, two judges found Hartford had been neither capricious nor arbitrary when the insurance company denied Doroshow’s claim for long-term unemployment. The third judge disagreed, arguing in his dissent that Doroshow had not received treatment for the condition that precipitated his claim with Hartford. We will have to look at the backdrop against which this case developed.

Jay Doroshow joined the staff of CVS Corporation and qualified for coverage under its long-term disability income insurance plan (administered by Hartford) on July 1, 2006. The policy stated that benefits would not be payable for disabilities “caused by, contributed to, or resulting from… a pre-existing condition.” The look-back period on the policy was 12 months (3 months for exempt employees).

Doroshow went in for an electomyographic (EMG) test on July 25, 2005, just under a year from his effective date of coverage.  While this test demonstrated that Doroshow had some form of motor neuron disease, it did not lead to a diagnosis of ALS.In December of 2005 Doroshow suffered a stroke. On May 16, 2006, during a follow up visit for the stroke he had previously suffered, Doroshow’s doctor noted in his file that he felt that ALS was not the diagnosis. It wasn’t until March 15, 2007 that Doroshow was finally diagnosed definitively with ALS. He applied the following day for disability benefits under his plan with Hartford.

After reviewing Doroshow’s medical information, Hartford denied him benefits based on the fact that he had been under treatment for motor neuron disease during the three month look-back period. Because his doctor had discussed the possibility of ALS during his May 15, 2006 office visit, Hartford considered ALS a pre-existing condition.

Doroshow appealed first with Hartford, and then filed an action with the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, claiming that Hartford’s denial was arbitrary and capricious. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. District Court granted summary judgment to Hartford stating that Doroshow had not demonstrated the arbitrary and capricious nature of Hartford’s denial.

When the appeal of this decision reached Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the primary consideration was whether Doroshow’s condition should be considered pre-existing even though it had not been diagnosed during the look-back period.

Two of the judges ruled that it could be, while one dissented. The two judges based their reasoning upon the fact that not only had his physicians suspected ALS before the look-back period, Doroshow had a family history to suggest that this was a reasonable diagnosis. The court rules that for Hartford to deny disability benefits based on this information was logical not capricious.

These two judges agreed with the dissenting judge that in general they would not consider ruling out a condition as giving advice or treatment for a condition. But based on Doroshow’s family history of ALS, the two judges felt that it was not unreasonable for Hartford to determine that he received advice from his physician for this condition, especially when two other doctors had also considered ALS in connection with his symptoms.

The dissenting judge argued strongly that probability is not pre-existing. She stated her concern that this decision contradicted previous decisions. She also felt their decision would strengthen the tendency for insurance companies to look at any symptom that an insured person has during the look-back period as demonstrating a pre-existing condition. Her concern is that by concluding that “Doroshow likely had ALS all along, ALS was a “pre-existing condition.'” This does a disservice.

Cases like this will continue to be dicey, because case law interpretation isn’t a science. It involves trying to define exactly what policy language means. We can expect to see more cases that test the definition of what a pre-existing condition really is.

Comments (2)

  • Dolores, we are sorry to hear of your denial. You must appeal this decision. Yes, you can certainly get both LTD from Hartford and benefits from SSA, however the Hartford would get to offset (reduce) the amount of money you receive from SSA if LTD benefits are approved. Please contact us for a free consultation so that we can learn more about your case and let you know our thoughts on the pre-existing condition denial.

    Alex Palamara Aug 13, 2022  #2

  • I have mental health that’s been going on since 2007. I’ve been out on short-term disability going into the long-term with Hartford. They sent me a letter stating that I was denied because it was pre-existing. What shall I do? I also applied for my social security disability which I was receiving already, they cut it off due to making too much money at Amazon so, I reapplied and they are waiting to see what’s going on with the medical records. Can you draw social security disability and long-term disability through Hartford of Amazon?

    Dolores D. Aug 12, 2022  #1

Leave a comment or ask us a question

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you help Hartford claimants nationwide?

We represent Hartford clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Hartford disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Hartford. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Hartford.

How do you help Hartford claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Hartford long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Hartford:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Steven (Minnesota)

When we started this journey in January 2016 with the first Total Knee Replacement, which landed us with Long Term Disability and not returning to a work force at the age of 55. We knew we needed to find an attorney that would represent our needs. Started researching Attorney’s online and discovered one that showed no desire to actually help our case.

So, through more research and reading reviews we discovered Dell & Schaefer Law Firm. The reviews posted, were concisely what we experienced with Gregory Dell. From the very first email Greg was expeditious in his communication with us, Greg even personally called us in the evening, while on vacation I believe. It is a difficult journey going through SSDI and Long Term Disability Insurance claims with CIGNA and ADVANTAGE 2000, Gregory helped us navigate the entire way while showing empathy for our specific needs. Greg truly embraced the customer service aspect of letting us know we are important to him. Greg and his team supported our slow speed to a decision that would be right for us. We always had clear direction and guidance. Greg and his Team showed great tenacity in achieving the best possible outcome for us.

We highly recommend this professional, personable TEAM of ethical attorneys to support you in your needs as well. Thank you Gregory Dell & Team.

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us