Unum Lifts Mental Health Limitation on Disability Claim
When our client first contacted our office and spoke with Attorney Stephen Jessup her claim for long term disability benefits had been approved by Unum under the 24 month mental health limitation contained in most Unum group disability policies. Despite our client’s attempts to prove to Unum that she was suffering from epileptic seizures, which were the true cause of her inability to work, Unum held fast to its position that our client did not suffer from epileptic seizures and that her condition was the result of psychogenic pseudoseizures and therefore her problems were mental in nature – or essentially – her issues were all in her head.
Unable to get anywhere with Unum she retained Attorney Jessup to fight on her behalf. When Attorney Jessup began representing her in mid-2018, Unum was not only applying the 24 month mental health limitation, it was also questioning whether our client was in fact disabled from a mental health condition. At that time Unum had been paying benefits to our client under “reservation of rights,” which is a way of saying that in a showing of good faith Unum would pay benefits while they continued their review of the claim and by making these payments under reservation of rights they were not admitting liability under the policy. The positive was Unum was paying the benefit while conducting its review, but the overwhelming concern as to a complete and total denial was very real.
With assistance from her treatment providers Attorney Jessup was able to overcome the first obstacle and get Unum to admit full liability under the policy and lift the “reservation of rights” payment status. Unum had fully determined that our client was disabled from performing the duties of her pre-disability occupation, which was a step in the right direction, but Unum was still holding firm to the belief that our client’s seizure condition was somatic in nature and therefore a mental health condition.
The 24 Month Review and Denial
For the better part of a year Attorney Jessup worked with our client’s neurologist to document her claim so that disability would be supported. As is often the case with people suffering from seizures it is not always easy to definitively document the problem by way of EEG testing as an EEG only captures a moment in time. Unum used this fact to argue that there was a lack of objective evidence to support the presence of a physical medical condition that would support the inability to work. Despite Unum’s continued arguments, enough medical information was provided to establish our client’s condition that it prompted Unum to respond by requesting our client undergo an Independent Medical Examination (IME).
The IME doctor found that our client did not suffer from epileptic seizures, stating that inpatient video of EEG abnormality did not equate to definitive diagnosis of seizures in “absence of EEG abnormalities occurring in relationship to purported seizures.” He went on to opine that our client likely had psychogenic pseudoseizures. A large problem with this logic, as Attorney Jessup would argue in his appeal, was that all the psychological reviews performed by Unum did not find any evidence of a psychological condition that would account for the problems are client was experiencing. Nevertheless Unum had the opinion it needed to terminate benefits.
As noted above, the denial of benefits was predicated on the IME doctor’s opinion that our client suffered from psychogenic seizures and that the lack of a definitive underlying EEG abnormality was required in order to make the diagnosis of epilepsy. Attorney Jessup argued in his appeal that EEG evaluations typically only record a 30 minute snapshot of the brain’s activity and that the sensitivity of the EEG, that is, the likelihood that the test will pick up an abnormality, is not always present. Even with long term monitoring, as our client underwent, one would not necessarily expect to see definitive EEG seizure activity, contrary to the IME doctor’s assertions. Attorney Jessup, through support from our client’s doctor argued that epilepsy is a clinical diagnosis that is made on the basis of history and examination and that an EEG is just one piece of the puzzle and does not replace careful medical evaluation.
During the course of representing our client, Attorney Jessup also worked in coordination with our client’s Social Security disability advocate to present her claim to the SSA as one based on epilepsy and not on account of mental health related condition. This coordinated effort paid dividends as prior to submitting her appeal with Unum our client learned that her claim for SSDI was approved by the SSA on account of epilepsy. Attorney Jessup obtained a complete copy of the SSA claim file as further evidence of our client’s entitlement to continued long term disability benefits.
Despite Unum having performed an IME and ultimately having strong legal basis to apply the 24 month mental health limitation, Attorney Jessup was confident that the information presented in the appeal would establish with Unum’s appeal department that the claims department had erroneously terminated benefits. In what was one of the quickest appeal reviews Attorney Jessup has had, Unum overturned its denial of our client’s claim in just ten days after receiving the appeal.
What’s to come?
Now that our client is back on claim Attorney Jessup is working with Unum as it relates to the overpayment resulting from receipt of SSDI benefits and in doing so is laying out the foundation of securing a lump sum settlement of our client’s case. This case serves as a reminder that Unum will look to take a physical medical condition and try to twist it to make it appear somatic in nature in an attempt to fit it into its 24 month mental health limitation.
It is important to remember that even if Unum, or any insurance carrier for that matter, approves your claim solely on a mental health condition that you are not barred from being able to continue to argue entitlement to benefits on account of physical medical conditions.
If Unum applies a mental health limitation to your claim and you are suffering from physical medical conditions that prevent you from working please feel free to contact Attorney Jessup or one of our other disability attorneys to discuss your claim.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Unum Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Unum Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Unum Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Does UNUM periodically review Group Long Term Disability Insurance claims/payments? For example, do they verify medical eligibility every five or ten years?
Q: My group long term disability insurance allows me to work part time up to 20% of my pre-disability earnings without affecting my benefit. If I take advantage of this, will Unum use this to deny my benefit?
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, UNUM overturned previous denial of long term disability benefits for South Carolina Nurse
Unum Overturns Original Decision to Deny Benefits to Disabled Account Manager Following Appeal Submitted by Dell Disability Lawyers Appeals Team
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, UNUM overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for Colorado Plumber
Court Rules Plaintiff's Medical Records Was Replete With Evidence Supporting Claim of MS & Was Not A Pre-Existing Condition
After paying for 13 years Unum Denies Disability Benefits to Woman with Lyme Disease and Endometriosis
Inexperienced Lawyer Handles Unum Disability Lawsuit and Fails to Provide Evidence to Support Occupational Argument
Massachusetts court overturns Unum's decision to terminate disability benefits after paying for nearly ten years
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.