MetLife Improperly Applies Limitation For "Neuromusculoskeletal and Soft Tissue Disorder" to Long Term Disability Claim
MetLife writes one of the most restrictive 24 month limitations in its ERISA governed group disability policies for medical conditions that they deem fall under the definition of “Neuromusculoskeletal and Soft Tissue Disorder.” The language commonly used defines the term to mean:
Neuromusculoskeletal and soft tissue disorder including, but not limited to, any disease or disorder of the spine or extremities and their surrounding soft tissue; including sprains and strains of the joints and adjacent muscles, unless the Disability has evidence of (a) seropositive arthritis; (b) spinal tumors, malignancy, or vascular malformations (c) radiculopathies (d) myelopathies (e) traumatic spinal cord necrosis or (f) musculopathies.
This language is obviously intended to limit MetLife’s responsibility to pay benefits for the overwhelming majority of pain related conditions. However, in the recent case of Arquilla-Romeo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company an Ohio Federal Judge ruled that MetLife was misapplying the limitation and acted arbitrary and capricious in terminating the plaintiff’s claim based on the interpretation MetLife chose to apply.
Many ERISA governed group disability policies contain discretionary clauses that grant the insurance company the exclusive right to interpret the terms and conditions of its policy. In denying Arquilla-Romeo’s claim, MetLife did just that by determining that her disability, resulting from a lumbar fusion was limited to 24 months under the Neuromusculoskeletal and Soft Tissue Disorder limitation contained in the policy. In many cases the court will defer to the insurance companies interpretation of its policy to the detriment of the insured. However, as this case shows this is not always the case.
The Semantics of “And” and “Or”
In arguing motions to the Court it became evident that MetLife was interpreting and subsequently applying the limitation to mean a Neuromusculoskeletal “OR” soft tissue disorder would be limited to a maximum benefit period of 24 months. However, the Court was quick to point out that MetLife, when drafting the policy, did not accomplish writing a policy that created the interpretation it was applying. The Court noted that MetLife consistently ignored one of the most basic premises of contract interpretation – that the word “and” and the word “or” are not interchangeable. In applying this premise, the Court states that it must give meaning to every word in the contract and “may not engage in an interpretation that renders terms meaningless.”
Based on the foregoing the Court ruled that the only reasonable interpretation of the phrase “neuromusculoskeletal and soft tissue disorder” is to conclude that there are two parts: (1) that the disorder affects the neuromusculoskeletal system AND (2) that the disorder affects the soft tissues. Any other interpretation would be unreasonable and ignore the language MetLife chose to select. In turn, the Court found MetLife’s denial of Arquilla-Romeo’s claim to be arbitrary and capricious and remanded the claim back to MetLife to render a decision in accordance with the Court’s ruling.
(NOTE: In remanding the case, the Court did NOT award Arquilla-Romeo her disability benefits, but rather forced MetLife to conduct further review. As such, there is no guarantee that MetLife will ultimately change its decision to deny her claim).
How Does This Affect You and Your MetLife Policy?
As a large percentage of MetLife policies contain the above noted policy provision and the fact that many claims for benefits are made due to pain related conditions, this ruling could be used as a strong argument that benefits for conditions that MetLife would normally determine fall into the limitation should not be terminated at the 24 month mark. That being said, this ruling does not serve as a guarantee that MetLife will not find a way to deny your claim for benefits for an alternate reason. If you have a claim with MetLife and they are asserting that it is subject to a Neuromusculoskeletal and Soft Tissue Disorder limitation of 24 months, please feel free to contact our office to discuss how we may be able to assist you in fighting for benefits beyond the 24 month limitation period.
Attorneys Dell & Schaefer did not represent Ms. Arquilla-Romeo, nor had any involvement in any stage of her claim for benefits.
– Read more Metlife disability cases and user comments on this page.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your MetLife Disability Application Approved
Prevent a MetLife Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a MetLife Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Would any new disabling conditions be considered by Metlife when considering whether or not to continue my benefits?
Q: Do I have to sign and return MetLife's authorization to disclose my info in order to continue my claim?
Senior Global Tax Director for billion dollar worldwide industrial company is again receiving disability benefits from MetLife after Appeal by Attorney Alexander Palamara
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.