MetLife Disability Denial Upheld when Claimant Files Lawsuit Without ERISA Appeal
In Zuke v. American Airlines, Inc., plaintiff had received 13 years of long term disability benefits when MetLife, the plan administrator, terminated them. When Zuke’s administrative appeal was denied, she filed an ERISA lawsuit. When the Ohio district court agreed with MetLife, she appealed. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit held that MetLife’s termination of benefits was arbitrary and capricious since it was based on reviewing doctors’ opinions while ignoring objective evidence of disability included in reports of treating physicians. The case was remanded to MetLife with instructions to conduct a “full and fair inquiry… in accordance with this Court’s precedent.”
Mar-Ya Zuke was employed by American Airlines as a sales and service representative when she was severely injured in a car accident. She was disabled and received long term disability benefits for 13 years when MetLife sent her a letter requesting medical information to support her claim for continuing benefits. She said she sent what was requested, but there was some confusion about whether MetLife received all the documents that were faxed to it. Ultimately, her benefits were terminated.
Zeke followed the steps for an administrative appeal and provided documentation to support her claim. MetLife had independent medical specialists review her medical records. All reviewers concluded there was no objective evidence of her disability. MetLife again terminated her benefits and she filed an ERISA lawsuit in an Ohio district court. That court agreed with MetLIfe and Zuke filed an appeal.
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit analyzed the medical records and decided MetLife acted arbitrarily and capriciously and had denied Zeke a “full and fair review” when it engaged in a “selective review of the administrative record” in order to support its decision to deny coverage.
MetLife Erroneously Terminated Benefits Based on its Selective Review of the Administrative Record
After review of the medical records, the Sixth Circuit found that “the Plan’s conclusion that there was no objective evidence contradicts the record.” The record included:
- Zuke’s spinal MRIs showed “fairly extensive degenerative disease” and a “new disc herniation.”
- The results of a Spurling test indicated she suffered from radicular pain.
- A physician’s noted she had a limited range of motion of the right shoulder.
The court noted that, “a treating physician’s notes detailing functional capabilities of a patient are objective evidence.” Although plan administrators are not required to “accord special deference to the opinions of treating physicians,” when they dismiss objective findings from treating physicians, “it suggests that the Plan’s decision was not a result of a deliberate, principled reasoning process.” In this case, the court concluded that the plan did not provide Zuke with a full and fair hearing.
Since the error was with “the integrity of the plan’s decision making process, rather than a claimant was denied benefits to which [she] was clearly entitled,” the case was remanded to the plan administrator with instructions to conduct a full and fair review of Zuke’s claim.
This case was not handled by our office, but we believe it can be instructive for those who have been receiving long term disability benefits for a number of years and are faced with the need to provide their plan administrators with documentation of the continuing disability. If you have about your disability benefits, contact one of our attorneys for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your MetLife Disability Application Approved
Prevent a MetLife Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a MetLife Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Would any new disabling conditions be considered by Metlife when considering whether or not to continue my benefits?
Q: Do I have to sign and return MetLife's authorization to disclose my info in order to continue my claim?
Senior Global Tax Director for billion dollar worldwide industrial company is again receiving disability benefits from MetLife after Appeal by Attorney Alexander Palamara
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.