California lawmakers want to assist disability insurance claimants
A recent article written by Evan George of the Los Angeles Daily Journal, documents a new bill that would be a great thing for long-term disability claims that are governed by ERISA. If this bill passess, we can only hope that other states across the country would adopt similar legislation. Discretionary clauses do nothing other than tie the hands of judges and increase the profits of disability isnurance companies. A special thanks to Evan for sharing this article with our law firm and for his efforts in independently reporting the actions of long-term disability insurance companies.
Lawmaker Wants to Level Field for Disabled
by Evan George
Spurred by stories of sick and injured policyholders whose disability claims are improperly denied and then tied up in court, a Sacramento lawmaker has introduced legislation that experts say would level the playing field for the disabled.
State assemblyman Dave Jones said his bill, AB 1868, “will help disabled people across California who have suffered from disability insurers’ refusal to make good on their promise.”
The bill seeks a quick fix to what Jones called the “unfair and unequal” legal standing policyholders have suffered in federal courts because of certain clauses that insurance companies insert into the policies, making the companies, and their paid doctors, the sole authority on whether a claimant is disabled.
Under the proposed legislation, those “discretionary clauses” would be null and void.
It would require the state Insurance Commissioner to reject policies that contain those previsions and strike them from existing policies.
The Assembly’s Insurance Committee will hold a hearing on AB 1868 today.
The legislation comes nine months after an investigation by the Daily Journal revealed that hundreds of disabled Californians who are denied benefits face a long and difficult fight on their own, without the aid of government regulators and in an arena that favors insurers.
State and national trade groups for the insurance industry have pledged to fight the bill, saying it removes the insurers’ ability to adjudicate claims and weed out malingering claimants.
“Your bill would turn the claims paying process into chaos,” wrote one lobbyist for the California Association of Health Underwriters in a letter to Jones.
Experts on health law applauded the effort as a strong and necessary consumer protection.
It also has the backing of the Consumer Attorneys of California and individual lawyers who represent policyholders.
Disability insurance, which now covers more than a third of the workforce, typically promises to pay two-thirds of workers’ wages if they become too sick or injured to work.
In most cases, when a worker who has paid for disability benefits files a claim, the insurer will review it and pay.
But some cases – particularly those where the insured reports suffering from complex symptoms like long-term injuries of the back, neck and spine – are denied, even if treating physicians and the Social Security Administration say they can’t work.
The result is that workers who believed they had a safety net find themselves fighting for benefits at the same time they are dealing with health problems and medical bills.
That was the case with Sandra Frost, a former Wells Fargo Bank manager in the East Bay, who plans to testify at today’s hearing.
Frost, 47, has been diagnosed with narcolepsy, chronic pain and another rare condition called Chiari Malformation, which makes working impossible.
She had a group policy with MetLife and received disability coverage in 2002. But by 2004, the insurer and its doctors decided she could return to work, despite what her physicians and the federal government said.
She has been fighting ever since, Frost said.
During a limited bench trial, a district judge found that MetLife did not “abuse its discretion” and dismissed her case. The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeal in 2007 found she should be paid for 3 months of disability, but confirmed that the district court was right to apply a high burden of proof because of that discretionary clause.
MetLife was owed deference in deciding her case, the court found.
“They have no accountability,” Frost said in an interview. “I lost my house, my car, and my good credit rating, and it just wasn’t fair.”
A MetLife spokeswoman on the East Coast could not be reached for comment late Tuesday and a MetLife defense lawyer in California did not return a telephone call seeking comment. The New York-based insurance company has had more than 177 lawsuits like Frost’s brought against it between 2004 and 2009 in California alone.
That legal battle would be made easier for plaintiffs if the bill passes, said Bryan Liang, executive director of the Institute of Health Law Studies at California Western Center School of Law.
“What this bill really does is requires some enforcement,” Liang said.
Brietta Clark, another health law professor at Loyola Law School, said she backed the measure even though she believed it did not go far enough.
“It’s still reactive,” said Clark, because it fails to address the practice of paying a stable of doctors to justify denying legitimate claims. “It doesn’t help patients until they get to trial.”
Both experts said it accomplished the goal of letting judges, not insurers, decide a case based on evidence.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong MetLife Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Metlife appeal.
Sue MetLife
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Metlife.
Get Your MetLife Disability Application Approved
Prevent a MetLife Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a MetLife Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
They demanded an overpayment, stopped my claim, and lied about it
Reply
Your decision making process is absurd!
My husband has 2-5 yrs to live, yet MetLife has been giving him the run around
Reply
Inappropriate conduct!! Rude, discriminatory, etc
Reply
Haven't been paid since MetLife denied my appeal months ago
Reply
Metlife closed my STD claim amid several injuries
Reply
Metlife's COLA recalculation cut my payments with no explanation why
Reply
MetLife stopping my benefit plan. I'm still disabled
Reply
Q: MetLife: Mental Health and Physical Disabilities
Q: Can my employer switch my job because I go on LTD?
Q: Can MetLife deduct the ssdi benefits I receive for my dependent kids from what they pay me?
Q: Is MetLife entitled to overpayment if they realized 15 years later?
Q: Do I have to sign and return MetLife's authorization to disclose my info in order to continue my claim?
Q: How long does MetLife have to render a decision on my application for benefits?
Q: I found out about my STD policy 120 days late. Can I do anything?
Q: Does my former employer owe me STD that he refused to pay earlier?
How Does Having A Disability Lawyer Help Me Fight For Metlife Disability Benefits?
What Should I Expect if Metlife Wants to Send Someone to Interview me?
MetLife Disability Buyout and Lump Sum Settlements are Back
Metlife - Latest trends seen in handling ERISA and private disability insurance claims
Disability Denial Reason #1 – Paper Review & IME
How to Apply for Reliance Standard Disability Benefits & Top 5 Reasons for a Claim Denial
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
Guardian Disability Benefit Claim Handling Tips
Teacher's Disability Benefits Reinstated by MetLife
MetLife Denies Disability Benefits and Tells TFORCE Truck Driver Its Safe For Him to Drive
Contracts Manager With Toxic Encephalopathy Wins MetLife Long Term Disability Denial Appeal
MetLife Approves Long Term Disability Claim For Executive Assistant with Neck Pain
MetLife Approves Disability Benefits to Dentist With De Quervain's
Dell Disability Lawyers Successfully Appeals Metlife Denial of Benefits to Veteran
Metlife Overturns Denial on Appeal by Dell Disability Lawyers
Senior Global Tax Director for billion dollar worldwide industrial company is again receiving disability benefits from MetLife after Appeal by Attorney Alexander Palamara
Reviews from Our Clients






