Aetna Is Sued For Failure To Pay ERISA Benefits To Boeing Employee For Injuries Sustained In A Shooting

A Washington disability lawyer filed a federal lawsuit in the District Court for the Western District of Washington, at Seattle, against Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna) and The Boeing Company Long Term Disability Plan (Boeing). The Plaintiff, Patrick D., worked as a real-time software engineer for Boeing, which contracted with Aetna to provide long-term disability coverage to its employees. The Plaintiff’s employment with Boeing afforded him the protections under this Plan.

In Patrick D. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company and The Boeing Company Long Term Disability Plan, Plaintiff has filed a lawsuit to recover long-term disability benefits protected under ERISA.

Case Facts Against Aetna And Boeing

Plaintiff had been employed by Boeing since 1989, including working as a real-time software engineer. He had received exemplary reviews on his performance as a real-time software engineer.

In 1971, the Plaintiff had been a victim of a shooting that caused massive damage to his face and head. As a result, the Plaintiff has had to undergo repeated surgeries over a 22-year period, including a 17-hour surgery to his head in 1996.

After this 1996 surgery, the Plaintiff’s performance had declined from exemplary to unsatisfactorily. In 2007, a performance appraisal stated that the Plaintiff was less than one-fourth as productive as the typical employee in his position. After this appraisal, Plaintiff consulted The Boeing Company’s Employee Assistance Program (EAP), who advises him to go onto disability and seek professional help to diagnose and possibly alleviate the problems that were hindering his work production. In June 2007, Plaintiff quit work and applied for disability benefits. Aetna initially granted Plaintiff’s claim for short term disability benefits.

Aetna’s Termination Of Further Benefits

However, beginning September 1, 2007, Aetna terminated Plaintiff’s short term disability benefits. Plaintiff submitted an appeal on October 31, 2007, including explanations of his condition, X-Rays, and documentation from his care providers. Aetna responded by providing an additional 10 days of short term disability benefits through September 11, 2007, but nothing more.

Plaintiff submits second appeal of the denial of benefits on March 30, 2008, along with documentation from his treating physicians and the results from a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation conducted by neuropsychologist Glenn Goodwin, Ph.D. in February 2008. Aetna responded by restoring his short term disability benefits through the maximum duration of the short term disability period, which was December 13, 2007. Aetna also stated that his file had been returned to the claim team for “further case management.”

However, via letter on August 5, 2008, Aetna informed Plaintiff that long term disability benefits were again denied due to Plaintiff’s pharmacy not establishing that his disability was not the result of a pre-existing condition. On August 12, 2008, Aetna received a letter from the Plaintiff that included all pharmacy records to help Aetna make a determination on whether Plaintiff’s condition was a pre-existing condition or not.

On September 18, 2008, Plaintiff received a letter from Aetna, who acknowledged that the pre-existing condition exclusion did not apply to the Plaintiff’s case, but still denied long term disability benefits because the results from the February 2008 neuropsychological evaluation were determined to be too “stale” to establish Plaintiff’s disability beginning May 8, 2008.

Plaintiff submitted an appeal in April 2009 that included additional medical documentation to establish Plaintiff’s claim. Via letter on June 23, 2009, Aetna again restored benefits effective May 1, 2008. However, these benefits were again terminated as of December 13, 2009 due to Plaintiff’s disability being caused by a mental illness, which only allows for benefits to be paid for 24 months, ending December 13, 2009.

Plaintiff files another appeal that includes another detailed report by neurologist Gregory Hipskind and treatment records from his treating neurologist, Dr. Gary Stobbe. In response, Aetna had Joseph Rea, M.D., examine the Plaintiff’s medical file, though there is no evidence that Dr. Rea has any training, expertise, or experience addressing neurological issues.

Plaintiff’s Attorney Files Lawsuit Against Aetna

According to the terms of the lawsuit, Plaintiff alleges that Aetna did not provide the following to the Plaintiff:

Plaintiff Seeks Following From Lawsuit Against Aetna

Due to the wrongful actions committed by Aetna, Plaintiffs wants the following relief from the Court:

Leave a comment or ask us a question