• Sedgwick Ignores Medical Records and Denies Disability BenefitsSedgwick Ignores Medical Records and Denies Disability Benefits
  • Sedgwick Claims Management Services Disability Benefit ClaimsSedgwick Claims Management Services Disability Benefit Claims
  • Third Party Administrator Role in Disability Insurance ClaimsThird Party Administrator Role in Disability Insurance Claims

7th Circuit Recognizes Chronic Debilitating Effects Of Fibromyalgia

In Cathleen Kennedy v. The Lilly Extended Disability Plan, plaintiff Cathleen Kennedy, an executive Director of Human Resources, had a history fibromyalgia dating back many years. As an employee of Eli Lilly and Company, she was covered by The Lilly Extended Disability Plan (“the Plan”), which was administered initially by Anthem Life and Disability and later by Sedgwick Claims Management Services (“Sedgwick”).

Benefit Provisions

Under the terms of the LTD Policy, the definition of disability changed after benefits were paid for 24 months. For the first 24 months, a claimant must be “unable to perform the material and substantial duties of her Own Occupation.” After 24 months, disability is defined as “the inability of an Employee to engage, for remuneration or profit, in any occupation commensurate with the Employee’s education, training, and experience, provided that the inability results from an illness or accidental bodily injury that requires the Employee to be under the regular care of a Licensed Physician.”

Initial Claim Approval and Subsequent Denial

Cathleen Kennedy was hired by Lilly in 1982 and rose rapidly, eventually becoming an executive director in the company’s human resources division, with a monthly salary of $25,011. In January 2007, Kennedy began experiencing symptoms that continued to worsen and eventually led to a diagnosis of fibromyalgia in April 2008. By December 2007, her symptoms had become so severe that she determined she was no longer able to work. Kennedy eventually applied for long-term disability benefits under the Plan; those benefits were approved effective May 1, 2009, with a monthly benefit of $18,972.44. Three and a half years later, however, her benefits were terminated. The Lilly Employee Benefits Committee (“EBC”) concluded that “while the submitted medical documentation revealed that fibromyalgia is primarily the condition causing some restrictions and limitations for work, there is no clinical evidence to support that the severity of your conditions, either individually or in combination with one another, would preclude you from engaging in every occupation that is consistent with your education, training, and experience, including various non-executive positions in compensation, benefits, and other human resource fields.” As a result, Ms. Kennedy filed suit.

District Court’s Decision

In granting Kennedy’s motion for summary judgment, the District Court found that “[h]aving examined the evidence cited by Lilly as supporting the EBC’s decision and finding that none of it actually provides the necessary support, the Court is left to [conclude] the record contains nothing more than scraps to offset the evidence presented by Kennedy and by [her physician] and, accordingly, the EBC’s decision fails to satisfy even the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard.” Lilly appealed the District Court decision.

7th Circuit’s Decision

In affirming the District Court’s decision, the 7th Circuit began its opinion with an extended description of the history of Fibromyalgia, its symptoms and the debilitating effect it has on patients. It also noted that “[t]here used to be considerable skepticism that fibromyalgia was a real disease…[n]o more.” The Court then examined of the medical evidence relied on by Sedgwick and Lilly to deny Kennedy which, in the Court’s view, “turned out to be a hodgepodge.” What’s more, the Court noted that “[a]ll deficiencies in its [medical] evidence to one side, Lilly has failed to indicate what job or kind of job, and at what level, Kennedy would be capable of performing if the company is permitted to cancel her benefits.” More specifically, the Court concluded that given the unpredictable “flares” characteristic in fibromyalgia patients, “Kennedy wouldn’t be able to work any regular schedule.” And finally, the Court noted that another questionable aspect of Lilly’s case is the company’s conflict of interest, by reason of its being both the initial adjudicator of an employee’s benefits claim and the payor of those benefits. “By cutting off Kennedy’s benefits the company has saved itself about $2.5 million. Big as Lilly is, that’s not a trivial loss.”

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

Leave a comment or ask us a question

FAQ

Do you help Sedgwick claimants nationwide?

We represent Sedgwick clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Sedgwick disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Sedgwick. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Sedgwick.

How do you help Sedgwick claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Sedgwick long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Sedgwick:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us