Nearly Three Years Later, Sedgwick Finally Pays Walgreens’ Pharmacist’s STD and LTD Claim

After three long years of struggling with no income due to Sedgwick’s failure to approve her benefits, the claimant is finally awarded the disability benefits she was rightfully owed. The claimant worked for Walgreens for approximately 11 years and was a dedicated employee who loved her profession. In early 2011 she began to feel fatigued and experienced pain in her muscles and joints. She was very concerned for her health and sought help from several physicians and specialists in order to find some answers. Her doctors ran every test under the sun; they ordered blood work, CT scans, Lyme tests, MRI’s, which all came back negative. The claimant was examined and treated by eleven doctors within a 6 month period at the prestigious Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, who all confirmed her diagnosis of Fibromyalgia.

Her condition continued to deteriorate and in September of 2011 she was no longer able to work as a pharmacist. At that point, her physicians notified her employer Walgreens of her inability to work due to severe, progressive Fibromyalgia with bodily pain, chronic fatigue, chronic daily headaches, papilledema secondary to pseudotumor cerebri, sleep and urinary dysfunction, neuromuscular pain, numbness and tingling of the bilateral upper extremities, frequent episodes of irritable bowel syndrome and secondary depression and anxiety. Sedgwick, a third party administrator hired by Walgreens to make claim determinations, failed to have her examined by a physician and merely conducted paper reviews of her medical records ignoring her treating doctor’s opinions that she was too ill to work in her occupation. The basis of Sedgwick’s denial of her claim was that she failed to provide objective evidence of her disability.

Judge Rules Sedgwick Was Wrong for Requiring Objective Proof of Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia is a type of muscular or soft tissue rheumatism that affects muscles and their attached bones and is also accompanied by fatigue, sleep disturbances, lack of concentration, changes in mood or thinking, anxiety and depression. Fibromyalgia can be severely disabling and can only be diagnosed by an examination of the patient. There is no objective test that exists that can show that a patient is suffering from Fibromyalgia other than performing a trigger point examination, which also relies on the patient’s subjective complaints. Therefore, it is impossible to provide objective proof of an illness such as Fibromyalgia when none exists. Therefore, it was improper for Sedgwick to require the claimant provide objective proof of her illness when Sedgwick knew it was impossible to do so.

In oral argument on the claimant’s summary judgment motion, Attorney Alters argued that Sedgwick’s demand for objective proof of the claimant’s was unreasonable and arbitrary and capricious. Sedgwick’s basis to deny the claim rested solely on the lack of objective evidence to support the diagnosis of Fibromyalgia. It is well established that there are no objective tests that exist to confirm or rule out whether someone is suffering from Fibromyalgia. A person can undergo MRI’s, EEG’s CT’s all day long, but none of these tests and studies can establish a diagnosis of Fibromyalgia. The Judge in this case agreed it was wrong for Sedgwick to require such objective evidence as it is impossible to provide, granted partial summary judgment in favor of the claimant and remanded the claim back to Sedgwick to conduct a proper review without requiring objective proof of her claim. The Judge further suggested that Sedgwick conduct an IME of the claimant by a rheumatologist to determine whether she was truly disabled.

Sedgwick Overturns Decision to Deny Benefits After Conducting Fourth Review

On remand, the claimant provided Sedgwick with additional medical records and several opinions from her treating physicians, including a rheumatologist, all supporting her inability to work. Sedgwick took the court’s advice and sent the claimant to a rheumatologist to conduct an independent medical examination. The rheumatologist who conducted the IME found that the claimant was clearly disabled as a result of fibromyalgia and stated as follows:

The patient’s condition required restrictions and limitations beginning from 09/19/13 through the present. Based on my evaluation on 04/20/14, the patient does have significant fatigue along with cognitive impairment and inability for sustained activity. Her Fibromyalgia is also complicated by frequent migraine headaches as well as other comorbidities like a depression and anxiety as well as other somatic symptoms of frequent urination from interstitial cystitis as well as interruption from irritable bowel syndrome.


Her restrictions and limitations have not changed since original disability date of September 2011. She has restrictions in lifting weights more than 10 pounds. She has restrictions in sustained sitting more than two hours at a time with a total of six hours in an eight-hour time period. She can stand only up to an hour at a time with a total of four hours in an eight-hour time period. She has difficulty in bending more than occasionally. She has also restrictions in reaching above the shoulder repeatedly and can do those maneuvers only occasionally. She has difficulty with repetitive movements involving the hands and she has difficulty reading constantly because of her neck pain. She has mental fatigue as well as cognitive dysfunction partly from the medication she is on and partly due to her Fibromyalgia conditions. Their restrictions and limitations have not changed since September 2011.

After conducting its fourth review of the claim, Sedgwick finally overturned its decision to deny the claimant’s benefits. Attorney Alters is in the process of filing a motion for attorney’s fees and costs and will take the position that the claimant had clear success on the merits of her claim and is entitled to fees. Attorney Alters will also continue managing her claim to help ensure she receives benefits as long as she remains disabled.

Read about other Fibromyalgia disability claims on this page.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

FAQ

Do you help Sedgwick claimants nationwide?

We represent Sedgwick clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Sedgwick disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Sedgwick. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Sedgwick.

How do you help Sedgwick claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Sedgwick long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Sedgwick:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Tracy L.

Stephen is an incredible attorney. He helped me tremendously and if I did not retain his services and expertise, I would have gotten a big fat zero. My case was challenging because I did not hire Stephen at the outset of the process and I regret that immensely. Both Stephen and Kathleen were communicative, responsive, organized and I really felt that they cared about me and my case. If I ever had questions or concerns they were addressed right away in a courteous and professional manner. Stephen was very strategic in his thinking and laid out a solid plan with regard to my case. This saved me excessive expense and also offered thoughtful, solid guidance that a client such as myself needed.

If you think you have a case – do not hesitate – do not work with other attorneys before speaking with Stephen Jessup at Dell & Schaefer. He is worth his weight in gold!

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us