Massachusetts Disability Attorney filed a lawsuit against Aetna on behalf of Biogen Idec, Inc.'s IT Technical Ops Lead for denial of long-term disability benefits
In the disability lawsuit of Joseph Mcdonough vs. Aetna Life Insurance Company, HM Life Insurance Company, Biogen Idec, Inc. & Biogen Idec., Inc., Group Long Term Disability Plan filed at the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the plaintiff filed a federal lawsuit against Aetna for violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA.)
Aetna Denies Long-Term Disability Benefits
The plaintiff Joseph Mcdonough was an IT Technical Ops Lead/Technical Project Lead for Biogen, Idec, Inc. By virtue of his employment, the plaintiff was covered under a contract of insurance between Biogen, Aetna, and HM Life Insurance Company. Both Aetna and HM Life Insurance Company were the insurers of the plan. In addition, Aetna also acted as the Plan administrator. The contract of insurance provided for long-term disability benefits in the event the plaintiff was disabled within the definition of the plan.
Under the Plan, the definition of Disability is:
You will be deemed to be disabled on any day if:
- You are not able to perform the material duties of your own occupation solely because of disease or injury; and
- your work earnings are 80% or less of your adjusted pre-disability earnings.
If your own occupation requires a professional or occupational license or certification of any kind, you will not be deemed to be disabled solely because of the loss of that license or certification.
The plaintiff suffered symptoms brought about by a stroke on November 28th, 2008 which included right-sided numbness and weakness, loss of balance, Left Hip Bursitis and pain, Type I Diabetes, Hypertension, and Panic Attacks with PTSD.
Disability Application Filed with Aetna
As a result of the stroke, the plaintiff made a claim to Aetna for both short-term and long-term disability benefits for the period of time beginning on November 23rd, 2008, when the plaintiff suffered from right-sided weakness and numbness, was hospitalized, and diagnosed as having suffered a stroke through the present.
The plaintiff was approved for short-term disability benefits for six (6) months by Aetna. Upon the expiry of the short-term disability benefits, Aetna approved the plaintiff’s claim for long-term disability benefits on May 23, 2009. In August 2009, Aetna began reviewing the plaintiff’s claim for continued benefits. Although the plaintiff’s attending physicians opine that the plaintiff is disabled and should remain out of work until October 9th 2010, Aetna terminated the plaintiff’s benefits on October 29th, 2009 without properly assessing whether the earning capacity of the plaintiff was 80% of his pre-disability income and without providing any of the notice requirements required by ERISA to inform the plaintiff of his rights.
The plaintiff appealed to Aetna on April 21st, 2010 the decision to terminate his claim for long-term disability benefits and was granted an extension by Aetna until Jul 26th, 2010 to submit additional information to support his ERISA appeal.
Aetna, however, sent the plaintiff a revised copy of its termination letter which contained the required ERISA notice requirements of the plaintiff’s rights. Although the plaintiffs was granted additional time to submit additional information to support his appeal, Aetna started reviewing the plaintiff’s appeal on May 12 2010, and determined that the “medical information did not support disability from own occ, 11/01/09”.
Aetna Applies Wrong Definition Of Disability
In addition, on September 10 2010, Aetna’s occupational medicine doctor, performed a review of some of the medical information submitted with the plaintiff’s appeal but reviewed them against the Social Security Administration criteria for determining disability. Aetna’s plan definition of disability required that the plaintiff be determined disabled in his own occupation while the Social Security Administration requires an individual to prove an inability to perform the duties of any occupation in order to receive benefits.
On November 17 2010, after selective reviews and without any reference to the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, Aetna upheld its decision to terminate the plaintiff’s long-term disability benefits.
Disability Insurance Lawyer Sues Aetna
In the lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged that Aetna:
- Failed to evaluate his claim long long-term disability benefits fairly and fully
- Failed to comply with the provisions of ERISA
- Unreasonably, irrationally, and contrary to evidence, the terms of the plan and the law denied the plaintiff’s claim.
- Influenced by a financial conflict of interest in its decision-making process
As a result of Aetna’s actions, the plaintiff alleged that he suffered damages and is seeking relief through the Court for:
- A declaration, adjudication, and decree that the plaintiff is entitled to long-term disability benefits as provided for under the plan.
- An award for the full amount of unpaid benefits under the plan together with pre-judgement interest as allowed by law.
- An order against Aetna for restitution to the plaintiff for the amount of losses sustained by the plaintiff as a result of Aetna’s action.
- An award for attorneys’ fees and cost
- An award for other relief that the court deem just and reasonable
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Q: Can Aetna deny my application on the basis of pre-exisiting condition? Do they discriminate against the mentally ill?
Q: Are there any circumstances in which I can appeal LTD after the number of days Aetna gives you to appeal?
Q: What can I do to stop Aetna from harassing me and realize that not all disabilities are the same?
Dell Disability Lawyers file Lawsuit in Federal Court against Aetna after it denied long-term disability benefits to former software Developer
After Aetna denied Ms. Garner's long-term disability claim, Ms. Garner filed suit against Aetna, and the Court overturned Aetna's decision and ordered it to pay Ms. Garner's disability benefits
Court Rules That Aetna’s Failure To Consider Plaintiff’s Actual Job Duties Was Arbitrary And Capricious
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.