Sun Life’s Video Surveillance Backfires & is Ordered to Pay Disability Benefits

In the case of Solnin v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company, et al., the plaintiff, an assistant bank manager, injured her back at work and was initially granted short term disability benefits under her employee benefit plan. The case has an extensive procedural history of Sun Life terminating benefits, adminstrative appeals and at least one previous court case.

In this action, in its attempt to discredit the plaintiff and prove she was not disabled and could work under the “any occupation” clause that now applied to her disability claim, Sun Life presented 17 days of video surveillance it conducted between April 15, 2002 and August 17, 2012. Sun Life claimed the videos showed the plaintiff engaging in activities inconsistent with her claims of disability. The court disagreed with Sun Life and, relying on Second Circuit precedent stated, “Although video surveillance tape may be instructive in comparing claimant’s behavior with her reported limitations (citations omitted), the information gleaned is not necessarily dispositive on its face and must be considered within the context of the particular case.”

Plaintiff’s Evidence Supporting Her Disability and Sun Life’s Response

Plaintiff’s treating physician examined her 36 times and concluded she was totally disabled from her spinal injury. She refused to undertake the risks associated with surgery and chose instead to live with chronic pain. In the fall of 2007, her physician noted that she could sit or stand continuously for only one hour at a time. He stated she could not sit for more than a total of two hours a day and placed the same limitation on her ability to stand. She could only carry up to 10 pounds occasionally and, if she was able to work at all, it would need to be at a job that would allow her to take 15 to 20 minute breaks whenever she needed them. Any employer could expect her to be absent four or more days a month.

Subsequently, Sun Life read a newspaper report about an intercontinental trip the plaintiff participated in. The report inspired Sun Life to begin video surveillance of her activities. Over the years, 17 different videos were taken and provided to the court with Sun Life’s claim that the videos proved she was not disabled as she claimed to be.

The Court’s Analysis of the Video Surveillance Tapes

The surveillance tapes showed the plaintiff watering her lawn for 12 minutes, dragging a trash can in front of her house, driving her car to various appointments, picking up dry cleaning and eating lunch in a restaurant. On 10 of the surveillance days, she never left her home. Even so, Sun Life seemed to be saying, “Gotcha” to the plaintiff, thinking the videos supported its denial of total disability benefits. It even had independent medical experts view the videos and agree with Sun Life that she was not disabled.

The court disagreed with Sun Life and its experts. It noted that there are cases where surveillance tapes reveal activity totally inconsistent with a claimant’s reported limitations, but “that is not the case here.” It determined that nothing shown on the tapes was inconsistent with the limitations put on her activities by her treating physician or in a statement she herself had submitted to Sun Life concerning her inability to work. The court concluded, “When viewing the totality of the evidence… plaintiff has proven, albeit it not overwhelmingly, but by a preponderance of the evidence, that she meets the definition of ‘totally disabled’ pursuant to the plan.”

This case was not handled by our office, but it may provide claimants guidance and hope as they continue a long term pursuit of total disability benefits under their insurance policy. If you need assistance with a similar matter please contact any of our lawyers for a free consultation.

Leave a comment or ask us a question

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Diana B. (Indiana)

Alex was very compassionate and professional in handling my case. Losing my disability caused extreme financial hardship and took a toll on my emotional health. Struggling with MS every day is a challenge, but Alex helped me greatly and was able to get my benefits reinstated as well as later he was able to get a lump sum settlement.

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us