North Carolina Court Determines That Sedgwick Abused Their Discretion And Wrongfully Denied Disability Benefits For BellSouth Employee
A BellSouth Customer Service Assistant, with the help of his North Carolina Disability Attorney, was forced to file a lawsuit against Sedgwick after being denied continued disability benefits.
History of the Claim
Mr. D. was employed as a customer service assistant for BellSouth Telecommunications (“BellSouth”) and was a participant in the Short Term Disability (“STD”) Plan, which was administered by Sedgwick, for BellSouth employees. In October 2008, Mr. D sought STD benefits after his doctor determined that Mr. D could no longer work due to significant mental health impairments. Sedgwick initially approved and paid Mr. D STD benefits for his mental health disorders beginning in September 2008. However, in July 2009, Sedgwick terminated Mr. D’s benefits.
Following two unsuccessful appeals of Sedgwick’s denial of benefits (and the exhaustion of his administrative remedies), Mr. D, through his disability attorney, sued Sedgwick in federal court arguing that Sedgwick had wrongfully terminated his short-term disability benefits.
After reviewing the substantial medical evidence presented by Mr. D in support of his claim for benefits, the North Carolina court determined that Sedgwick abused their discretion and wrongfully denied short term disability benefits for the following reasons:
- Out of the four professionals who actually interacted with Mr. D, none had concluded that Mr. D. could return to work.
- Sedgwick relied almost exclusively on a doctor’s questionable opinions about Mr. D’s symptoms;
- Sedgwick had arbitrarily refused to credit the evidence from Mr. D’s treating physician;
- Sedgwick ignored evidence and statements that raised serious questions as to whether Mr. D could function at any type of employment.
In reaching its decision, the court explained that there was “overwhelming evidence in the record showing [Mr. D]’s disability.” First, none of the four professionals who actually interacted with Mr. D concluded that Mr. Dr. could return to work. Mr. D’s treating physician, who had observed Mr. D over many years, had diagnosed Mr. D with Obsessive Compulsive disorder, Panic Anxiety Disorder with mild Agoraphobia, Bipolar I Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, delusional ideation and paranoia and hyper vigilance. Sedgwick arbitrarily refused to credit this evidence. Second, a vocational case manager concluded that Mr. D was not employable and issued a statement expressing her concern for “the safety and welfare of [Mr. D] and his co-workers and supervisors if [Mr. D] were to return to work.” Sedgwick again refused to credit this evidence.
Instead, Sedgwick retained a psychologist to perform an Independent Medical Evaluation (“IME”) of Mr. D who concluded that Mr. D exaggerated and over-reported complaints and symptoms. He reached this conclusion through an examination described by other psychologists to be inaccurate and the incorrect analysis to be used. Sedgwick ignored this criticism and instead relied almost exclusively on the IME provider’s questionable determination that Mr. D had exaggerated his symptoms.
The court explained that Sedgwick had improperly relied on the IME provider’s conclusion and that there was substantial credible medical evidence to support Mr. D’s claim. The court ultimately concluded that Sedgwick had wrongfully denied Mr. D short-term disability benefits.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Get Your Sedgwick Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Sedgwick Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Sedgwick Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Sedgewich is the worst-immediate denial of all requests for treatment. Rubber stamps DENIED ALL RFA’s
Attorney Alexander Palamara of Dell Disability Lawyers gets LTD Benefits Reinstated for former Walmart Manager who is now found disabled from Any Occupation
Court Orders Sedgwick to Pay Disability Benefits to Claimant with Carpel Tunnel Syndrome Even though the Employer Offered Her Accommodations
Reviews from Our Clients
Very satisfied with the work of this team. Took well care of my case and took all the necessary time to be responsive and attentive when I had questions. Guided me through recovery and returning to normalcy. All thanks to Jason & Tabitha, thank you!
I’m extremely satisfied with the experience I have had with this firm from day one. The lawyer who has handled my case, Alex, is very efficient and attentive to all my questions and concerns. They are always aware of how my case has gone and they care about my health. I feel optimistic with them because they are very attentive during the process of my claim. I would not hesitate to recommend families and friends if in any situation they need their services. Kathleen as well has been very well and assisted me with this case. I highly appreciate everything they have done for me.
It’s unfortunate when disability insurance companies come after older disabled policyholders just to help their bottom line. It can be a living nightmare the damage they can do to a family. Dell Disability Lawyers are polite, understanding and knowledgeable. They call you back and answer any question you have no matter how unimportant it can be. The amount of stress they took off of myself and family was incalculable. I recommend them highly to take care of any disability case whether it be filing for benefits or reversing a claim decision. They are outstanding.
I could not have been happier or more appreciative of the hard work they performed on my behalf. I was well briefed on my case and it was closed in a timely manner with a financially successful resolution.
Mr. Symonds and Sonia as well as everyone else we have worked with throughout this process have been very helpful, professional and caring to our situation. We are very thankful to have this great team on our side.
Without them my LTD company was dropping my plan with me still suffering from my accident, even with doctor’s statements I’m still disabled. The LTD company didn’t want to advance my policy to the next stage of years of pay. Dell Disability Lawyers saved my policy, and helped to enforce the LTD company’s own policy (for its policy holder, me) that I would be covered still under the LTD policy I had paid for at my previous job, when my accident occurred. These lawyers know what they are doing and can help you too. LTD companies will try to drop you when you still need coverage just because they don’t want to pay on your policy anymore. Don’t let them break contract with ya because they are trying to get out of it. Hit em with legal action to ensure the continuation of your policy you paid for. Dell Disability worked very well for me and continue to do so.
I was denied long term disability benefits from The Hartford after being on it for years. I found Dell Disability Lawyers after doing research online. In a matter of days they responded and explained to me everything that would be done. Dell Disability Lawyers were able to settle my suit against The Hartford very quickly and responded to me quickly. I would definitely recommend this team of lawyers for anyone that is fighting for their disability insurance.
I have had nothing but a great experience with Dell Disability Law Firm. Mr. Alex Palamara and his team went above and beyond my expectations. They will respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner. Thank you once again for taking my case.
This law firm is the best so far. MetLife denied me two times, they appealed two times for me and they won of course. So if you are on disability and want a chance at winning your case use this firm Dell disability lawyers, kind courteous understanding and they get the job done. You won’t be disappointed.