Liberty Mutual Life Insurance denies disability benefits for depression despite two hospitalizations by claimant
Mary Denny and her disability attorney recently filed a civil complaint in United States District Court in the Eastern Division of the District of Massachusetts against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Liberty) for Liberty’s refusal to pay Ms. Denny long-term disability benefits.
Up until the time she became disabled, Ms. Denney worked at North Carolina Baptist Hospital. Her duties at the hospital put her in a role of support for senior management as she served as a resource to executive management for the hospital to reach its financial and strategic goals while maintaining a high level of confidentiality and discretion.
Over the course of time, Ms. Denny developed major depressive disorder. She presented symptoms of depression, anger, irritability, panic, and anxiety to her treating physician, Dr. Heath Thornton on November 11, 2008. Dr. Thornton recommended that Ms. Denny seek counseling and also stay home from work.
Ms. Denny followed up with Dr. Thornton on November 17, 2008. At that time, he adjusted Ms. Denny’s medications and recommended once again that she stay out of work due to her major depressive disorder.
Unfortunately, Ms. Denny’s condition seemed to worsen over time until she was admitted to Moses Cone Health System for thoughts of suicide, anxiety, and depression. Upon being discharged, Ms. Denny was to see therapist Shana McCain and Natalie Errante to help her manage her depression.
In April of 2009, Ms. Denny applied for long-term disability benefits regarding her major depressive disorder. However, Liberty denied Ms. Denny’s claim in a letter dated May 8, 2009 stating, “the medical data on file does not indicate any acute deterioration or decompensation in your functioning at this time; therefore, functional impairment from psychiatric standpoint is not supported.” The decision made on Liberty’s part is completely at odds with Dr. Thornton’s recommendation that Ms. Denny not return to work.
Ms. Denny immediately appealed Liberty’s decision, reiterating the debilitating conditions from which she continued to suffer that severely hampered her ability to perform her job.
In the meantime, Ms. Denny continued to see Ms. McCain and Ms. Errante once every 3 to 4 weeks until she was admitted to Rowan Regional Medical Center on June 26, 2009. Again, Ms. Denny was having thoughts of suicide, depression, and anxiety.
After Ms. Denny’s second hospital stay, Ms. Errante sent a letter to liberty on Ms. Denny’s behalf outlining the ongoing symptoms Ms. Denny presents and Ms. Denny’s “very obvious need to not return to employment and receive her disability insurance until she is able to return to employment.”
Liberty didn’t see it that way. They denied Ms. Denny’s claim once again and informed Ms. Denny that she has exhausted all of her ERISA administrative remedies regarding her claim to receive disability insurance benefits from them regarding her major depressive disorder.
That left Ms. Denny no other course of action but to file a civil complaint against Liberty in order to receive disability insurance benefits. Ms. Denny and her disability attorney allege that liberty acted in unreasonably by denying Ms. Denny her disability claim because they rebuffed and ignored Ms. Denny’s treating physician’s recommendation that Ms. Denny stay out of work.
Ms. Denny and her attorney also allege that liberty’s denial of benefits to Ms. Denny is an abuse of discretion based on the long-term disability plan Ms. Denny had with Liberty.
Therefore, Ms. Denny is seeking disability insurance payments from the time she was disabled on November 7, 2008 through the present time along with any attorney fees and court costs incurred as a result of filing the civil complaint.
There are 2 opinions so far. Add your comment now.
Request a Free Consultation
Click here or call 800-682-8331 now!
We respond the same day.
We represent disability insurance claimants all over the United States.
We have handled thousands of disability claims and you can read about them.
- Administrative Appeal by Dell & Schaefer Helps Disabled Man with Eye Disorders Get Approved for Short Term Disability Benefits with Hartford; Long Term Benefits Next
- Dell & Schaefer ERISA Administrative Appeal Successful: Claimant suffering from Sleep Disorders, Depression and Fibromyalgia Now Receiving Long Term Disability Benefits
- Aetna overturns decision to deny LTD benefits for claimant suffering from post-concussion syndrome and neurocognitive disorder
- Dell & Schaefer ERISA Administrative Appeal Proves to MetLife that Client is Still Disabled and Claim Not Subject to Certain Policy Limitations
Read what our clients say about us.
- William A. ·I was hoping for some sort of settlement with my long term disability insurance company but to be honest I didn't expect to win my case. I contacted Dell & Schaefer in...› continue
- Harry K. ·Dell & Schaefer has earned a reputation as a top notch law firm specializing in disability insurance claims. I understand why. My personal experience was nothing short...› continue
- Joe C. ·After being denied twice for my short term disability benefits I called Dell & Schaefer. Then I filed my appeal on my own and was once again denied.After the denial...› continue