Disability lawsuit against MetLife alleges insurance company refuses to pay disabled claimant
Insurer states client should have taken strong anti-psychotic drugs during pregnancy and while breastfeeding, claims she is too “logical” and “organized” to receive benefits.
The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, known as MetLife (NYSE: MET), is being sued in United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, for refusing to honor its contractual obligation to pay long term disability insurance benefits to a psychologically impaired woman.
According to the lawsuit, filed by the nationwide disability insurance law firm of Dell and Schafer, MetLife claims that despite the woman’s medical diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Panic Attacks, Social Isolation, Phobias, Chest Pains, and Limb Numbness, that she is capable of performing her job as an information technology (IT) specialist for a manufacturer of dangerous chemicals.
Incredibly, MetLife claims that the client caused her own mental health issues by refusing to take potentially dangerous medication while pregnant and later breast feeding. Additionally, MetLife stated in its denial letter that the insurance company’s hired medical consultant states the woman is capable of working because she provided documents and records demanded by MetLife in a coherent manner.
“Your correspondence and communication with MetLife is neatly prepared and logical, well organized, and detailed. (Our) consultant indicated that this demonstrates that you have retained normal cognitive and organizational abilities which require consideration, focus, and fluent expression.”
Meanwhile, the client has faced foreclosure on her home, and continues to receive treatment for her psychological issues. She was forced to retain the counsel of attorneys to receive the benefits contractually owed to her under the terms of her long term disability policy.
The refusal by MetLife violates terms of her MetLife disability policy and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, commonly referred to as ERISA.
The client seeks MetLife to pay all Long Term Disability Benefits due to her under the terms of The Plan, plus all other damages, interest, and attorney’s fees. She also seeks all damages in the form of full, past, present, and future disability insurance benefits, interests, and attorney’s fees due to her pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1132(g)(1).
The lawsuit was filed in United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division.
There are 4 opinions so far. Add your comment now.
Request a Free Consultation
Click here or call 800-682-8331 now!
We respond the same day.
We represent disability insurance claimants all over the United States.
We have handled thousands of disability claims and you can read about them.
- Dell & Schaefer convinces Sun Life to Overturn Denial of Long Term Disability Benefits for a Person Suffering from Severe Cervical Disorders
- Hartford Agrees to Overturn its Previous Denial of Long Term Disability Benefits for an Employee of Adventist HealthCare who suffers from RSD/Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
- Florida Nurse wins long term disability benefits from UNUM after Disability Attorney Alex Palamara wins ERISA Appeal
- After Initially Being Denied Long Term Disability Benefits, Dell & Schaefer Gets Former Wal-Mart Employee on Claim with Liberty Mutual
Read what our clients say about us.
- Marlene D. ·When I saw myself in the need to seek legal advise, I didn't quite know where to turn, since I hadn't needed one ever before. So... keeping up with the times, I turned...› continue
- Thomas S. DVM ·When I first thought about a disability claim and what was required to qualify, I met with Greg Dell and he clearly spelled it all out for me. He quickly advised me...› continue
- Patricia E. ·After fighting with UNUM for over a year over whether I was disabled (I had been determined to be disabled by the Federal Government and had a letter stating such), I...› continue