An employee of Xerox Corporation files a lawsuit against Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Sedgwick Claims management Services, Inc., and The Prudential Insurance Company of America for disability benefits. An employee with Xerox for 10 years, Andrea Calhoun brought a lawsuit against her employer and Sedgwick under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 29 U. S. C. § 1001, et seq. “seeking to overturn a denial by the Defendant” of her long term disability benefits.
Calhoun’s Disabling Conditions
Calhoun, a victim of “degenerative joint disease in her left knee, fibromyalgia, left shoulder scapula dyskinesia, and recurrent abdominal and pelvic pain,” became disabled and unable to perform her job in March 2009. Calhoun filed her disability application with Sedgwick, the administrator of Xerox’s employee disability plan, and provided them with medical evidence that documented her diagnosis, which included radiographic reports, her doctor’s physical examination findings, and physical residual functional capacity evaluators from an orthopedic physician who was treating her. She also was armed with an MRI and findings from her treating rheumatologist. All of these symptoms came to a head in February 2008, when Calhoun’s MRI revealed a left knee medial meniscus tear and long full thickness chondral fissue that involved the patellar apex, which was preventing her from carrying out her job.
Calhoun continued working though injured until March 3, 2009 and on March 10, 2009 Calhoun underwent surgery to repair some of the knee damage, and subsequently attended physical therapy until August 2009. Not able to fully recuperate from the surgery and with continued pain from her damaged knee and other symptoms, Calhoun applied for, and was awarded, long term disability benefits from Sedgwick on August 13, 2009.
In November, 2009, Calhoun’s fibromyalgia flared, and in January 2010, Calhoun’s rheumatologist noted that Calhoun exhibited “tenderness with palpitation over the trochateric and subdeltoid bursa and soft tissue swelling over her clavicle,” conditions “consistent with myofascial pain.” Shortly after this diagnosis, Sedgwick terminated Calhoun’s long term disability benefits, stating that Calhoun’s “disability conditions were not supported by objective medical evidence. Just two days after the termination of her benefits, Calhoun’s doctor recommended further knee surgery and in the process did an MRI, which revealed that Calhoun’s left shoulder had an AC joint separation. And, a month later, Calhoun’s’ doctor diagnosed her with “chrondromalacia patella of the knees bilaterally, reduced range of motion on flexion and extension, tenderness to palpitation, over the lumbosacral and thoracic spines, scapula, and lateral aspects of the hips and tenderness on the patella and medial aspects of the left knee.”
Calhoun’s Condition Worsens
Needless to say, Calhoun immediately appealed Sedgwick’s termination of her long term disability benefits. However, Sedgwick upheld its termination decision in April 2011. Then in June 2010, Calhoun was checked by her physician regarding her fibromyalgia and it was noticed that she had “significant muscle pain and weakness, and multiple tender points, as well as subjective swelling, numbness and tingling.” Two days after this evaluation, Calhoun again appealed the termination of her Sedgwick benefits, only to be denied again in October 2010.
Continuing to suffer from numerous symptoms of her various conditions, Calhoun is unable to work, has exhausted all administrative appeals for her disability benefits, has provided objective evidence of her diagnosed conditions, and has hired a disability lawyer to represent her in this lawsuit.
Calhoun And Her Disability Lawyer File A Lawsuit Against Sedgwick
In her Complaint, Calhoun and her disability attorney allege that Sedgwick “without justification, has failed and refused to properly and adequately review [Calhoun’s] medical information, has refused to revise its determination that [Calhoun] is not entitled to long term disability benefits, and has failed and refused to grant [Calhoun] continued benefits to which she is entitled under the Plan.”
Calhoun and her disability attorney ask the United States District Court of the Southern District of Ohio Eastern District to hear her case and rule that Sedgwick provide Calhoun with all “benefits and related restitution” under her Sedgwick policy and any other relief the Court deems appropriate and just.