Unum Denial of Disability to Claimant with Lyme Disease Remanded by Washington ERISA Judge

In Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, the plaintiff was a Web Content specialist for Costco when he became ill and unable to work. His treating physician diagnosed him with Lyme disease and he received short term disability benefits for a period of time. He had numerous visits with his treating physician who also diagnosed him with chronic fatigue syndrome. He suffered from a multitude of symptoms, which were noted in his medical records, including anxiety and an inability to concentrate. He was prescribed a large number of medications, some with side effects that affected and diminished his cognitive functioning.

Bunger’s treating physician, as well as her colleague, frequently treated Bunger over a several month period of time. Both doctors clearly believed Bunger was disabled and could not work in any gainful occupation. His treating physician sent a report to Unum in support of Bunger’s application for long term disability benefits.

In evaluating Bunger’s request for short term and long term disability benefits, Unum hired two different experts who reviewed the records and concluded the medical evidence did not support Bunger’s claim that he was disabled. His short term benefits were terminated and his application for long term benefits was denied. After Bunger exhausted his administrative remedies, he filed this ERISA lawsuit.

The Court conducted a detailed and extensive review of the medical records and findings of Unum’s experts and remanded to Unum since, “The Court cannot determine whether Mr. Bunger is disabled, because Unum has failed to sufficiently develop the record.”

Unum’s Errors Identified by the Court

In denying Bunger benefits, Unum did not tell him what the problems were with his application and did not give him an opportunity to provide more information. Specifically, the Court found:
• Unum’s reviewers concluded Bunger did not have Lyme disease but never told him nor his physician he should be retested.
• Despite Unum’s concerns about Bunger’s treatment, it never suggested he be referred to an infectious disease specialist, neurologist or behavioral health specialist.
• Unum never suggested to Bunger’s physician that Bunger undergo cognitive testing.
• Unum never ordered Bunger to submit to an independent medical exam (IME).

The Court noted that Unum conflated the issue of whether or not “Mr. Bunger is sick with the issue of whether Mr. Bunger had been properly diagnosed.” Unum never suggested that Bunger did not suffer from the multitude of disabling symptoms his treating physician reported, only that he had not been properly diagnosed. Unum should have shared this with Bunger and given him an opportunity to “obtain the necessary testing, diagnosis, and treatment,” not to simply deny his claim.

The Proper Remedy

Unum argued that the Court should only decide whether or not Bunger had “met his burden of proof to show he is disabled” and the manner in which Unum handled the claim was irrelevant. The Court disagreed and held that “It would be manifestly unjust for this Court to find for Unum based on Mr. Bunger’s failure to meet his burden of proof, when it is entirely possible that the only reason Mr. Bunger has not met his burden of proof is that Unum has failed to ask Mr. Bunger for the additional testing it considers so critical.” The Court remanded to Unum with instructions to inform Mr. Bunger of what additional testing or diagnostics it required “in order to make an informed decision as to whether Mr. Bunger is able to perform his job functions.

This case was not handled by our office, but it might be helpful to those who have been denied short term and long term disability benefits without being informed by their insurer of what information is needed for a proper evaluation. If you have any questions about any aspect of your disability claim, contact one of our attorneys at Dell & Schaefer for a free evaluation.

Read more about Unum claims and Lyme disease disability.

Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

Leave a comment or ask us a question


Do you help Unum claimants nationwide?

We represent Unum clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Unum disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Unum. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Unum.

How do you help Unum claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Unum long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Unum:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews   *****

Noah P.

A few years ago I found myself unable to work and needing treatment. While I was getting the treatment I needed my employer fired me. This left me still needing treatment as well as needing to find a source of income. Not knowing where to turn or what to do my wife an I contacted Dell & Schaefer for help. Upon speaking with attorney Stephen Jessup we felt assured that we had found the help we needed. Attorney Jessup worked with the attorneys from my former employer and explained my situation to them. During the weeks of negotiations attorney Jessup kept us informed as to the progress and ultimately called us with a settlement offer. We were so relieved and grateful!

But that is not where our story ended. After informing us of the offer presented by my former employer, attorney Jessup advised me that he felt he could get us a better settlement with just a bit more time. I discussed it with my wife and we both felt confident in attorney Jessup’s advice so we allowed him to further negotiate on our behalf. Sure enough, a more equitable settlement was reached in a very short time. During the entire process attorney Jessup and the staff at Dell & Schaefer handled everything with very little input needed from us. This allowed me the time and reassurance that I needed in order to heal. Their professionalism and reassuring manner never left me feeling concerned that I wasn’t being fully represented despite the fact that they rarely needed participation directly from me. In the end my confidence in them was rewarded with a better settlement than I was expecting. My wife and I are forever grateful. From my experience it would be very difficult for Dell & Schaefer to improve upon their process.

Read 424 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us