The Standard's Denial of LTD Benefits for Financial Planner Upheld by Ohio Court
The Plaintiff in Daniel M. Wehner v. Standard Insurance Company (Standard) was an independent financial planner who was insured under a Group Long Term Disability Insurance Policy (Plan). He obtained his policy through the Association for Independent and Franchise Professionals. The Plan was administered by the Standard Insurance Company.
The Plan provided short-term disability (STD) benefits and long-term disability (LTD) benefits for those who were totally or partially disabled from performing the material duties of their own occupation due to a physical disease injury, pregnancy, or mental disorder.
The material duties were defined as “the essential tasks, functions and operations, and the skills, abilities, knowledge, training and experience, generally required by employers from those engaged in a particular occupation that cannot be reasonably modified.”
On August 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits noting he suffered from back, leg, and spine pain in addition to headaches resulting from a hypoxic event. He also had ulcerative colitis. He submitted medical records from five treating physicians. Only one treating doctor submitted an Attending Physician’s Statement in which she opined that Plaintiff’s “ability to function had declined significantly due to uncontrolled pain.” The doctor also reported that Plaintiff could not concentrate and could not sit for more than 15 minutes.
On October 13, 2016, Standard informed Plaintiff it needed more information in order to determine his eligibility for LTD benefits. On December 12, 2016, and again on February 7, 2017, Plaintiff wrote letters to Standard emphasizing he was applying for LTD benefits based on his total disability, not just partial disability. Plaintiff also claimed he became disabled in March 2016.
Standard Evaluated the Medical Reports of Five Treating Physicians:
· Dr. Severyn, a pain management specialist, diagnosed Plaintiff with spinal stenosis of the lumbar region and indicated he suffered from post laminectomy syndrome.
· Dr. Viljoen, a neurosurgeon, discussed with Plaintiff the option of surgery which Plaintiff would think about and consider.
· Dr. Kurpita saw Plaintiff many times through 2015 and 2016 and is the physician who provided the Attending Physician’s Statement. Dr. Kurpita noted that Plaintiff reported severe headaches and prescribed medication. The doctor also noted the medication did not cause side effects and did not interfere with Plaintiff’s ability to perform activities of daily living.
· Doctor Lin, a neurologist, treated Plaintiff for his headaches. The doctor thought the headaches were due to hypoxia suffered by Plaintiff during a recent MRI. The doctor saw Plaintiff several times, and Plaintiff reported that his symptoms stayed the same and did not change from visit to visit.
· Dr. Scholl, gastroenterologist and hepatologist, treated patient for abdominal pain. On May 24, 2016, the doctor noted that Plaintiff was feeling better overall, but his abdominal symptoms worsened his back pain.
Standard Called in Reviewing Physicians to Evaluate the Medical Evidence
Dr. Carlson, a vocational consultant and board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist, reviewed the medical file. She concluded that Plaintiff did suffer from pain due to his spinal fusions and diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, but that she did not believe he would have been precluded “from sedentary level work in the calendar year 2016.”
Dr. Carlson also reviewed Plaintiff’s Facebook account and found he had posts about “doing significant construction work around his house, as well as participating in hobbies and recreational activities such as fishing.” The doctor continued, “In my opinion, if an individual is precluded from doing sedentary level work, I would not anticipate that he would be able to do these other activities.”
Dr. Carlson also noted that Dr. Kurpita had not put any restrictions on Plaintiff. He could still drive a car and there was no impairment from any cognitive activities.
Based the medical evidence, on February 23, 2017, Standard denied Plaintiff’s claim for LTD benefits. Standard acknowledged that Plaintiff had documented chronic back pain and shoulder pain, but the records did not support a finding of disability. There were no restrictions on his ability to perform his sedentary job.
Plaintiff’s Administrative Appeal
On May 26, 2017, Plaintiff submitted medical records concerning should surgery in December 2016, letters from treating physicians and a functional capacity evaluation. He argued that his constant pain was severe enough to qualify him for total disability.
Plaintiff also argued that his Facebook posts merely showed he was trying to lead a healthy life. Besides, he said the gardening was light work that required no thinking and the construction project was done with the help of his wife and adult son.
Standard reviewed the medical records submitted and letters from treating physicians. Comments were that his headaches “are worsened by staring at computer screen,” or that his headaches “affect his ability to concentrate, make important decision, and create financial plans.”
Plaintiff also submitted a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). The physical therapist who conducted the exam concluded that the plaintiff was “limited in function consistent with lumbar radiculopathy.”
One of Standard’s reviewing physicians found that the medical records well-documented Plaintiff’s suffering from chronic low back pain, but that the pain should not limit his ability to perform the duties of his job. Another one found that although Plaintiff was precluded from working for the twelve weeks following his December 2016 spinal surgery, he could have otherwise performed his job duties. His claim for LTD benefits was denied.
Standard’s Denial of LTD Benefits Was Based on Substantial Evidence and Not Arbitrary and Capricious
On October 24, 2017, Standard denied Plaintiff’s appeal, so he filed this ERISA lawsuit. The Court carefully examined the administrative record and considered Plaintiff’s arguments and concluded that Standard’s decision denying LTD benefits was not arbitrary and capricious. The Court stated its reasons for each issue it resolved:
· Standard’s reliance on opinions of independent reviewing physicians was not arbitrary and capricious when Standard adequately explained its reasons for its decisions and also relied on objective evidence in making its decision.
· Standard did not act arbitrarily and capriciously by ignoring intellectual aspects of Plaintiff’s occupation when Plaintiff never argued that he was cognitively impaired. Plus, the independent reviewing physicians did consider those aspects of the medical records.
· Standard’s reliance on social media was not arbitrary and capricious.
· Standard did not act arbitrarily and capriciously when weighing the FCE because it gave a reasonable explanation for its decision.
· Standard did not “cherry-pick” the medical tests to rely on and explained why it made the choices it did.
The Court concluded that, “In sum, the Defendant did not act arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied Plaintiff disability benefits.”
If you have questions about your own disability claim, contact one of our attorneys at Dell & Schaefer for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Disability Benefit Denial Options
Submit a Strong Standard Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Standard appeal.
Sue Standard
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Standard.
Protect Your Benefits
Get Your Standard Disability Application Approved
We help claimants throughout the entire application process.
Prevent a Standard Disability Benefit Denial
We manage every aspect of your disability claim following claim approval.
Negotiate a Standard Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Standard Reviews
(642)
Policy Holder Rating
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
60%
1
40%
Timely Payments
1.9out of 5
Handling Claim
1.8out of 5
Customer Service
2.0out of 5
Dependable
1.9out of 5
Value
2.0out of 5
Showing 8 of 642 Reviews
Standard
Standard insurance just dropped me with no communication with me.
I was put on Standard insurance by my employer in 2019. I was told by them when I was first on disability that I would be on this for the rest of my life. After 2 years of... read more >
Reply
Standard
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry now
The Standard changed after the company was acquired by Japanese based Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Company in 2016 and subsequently being delisted from the US stock exchang... read more >
Standard
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry Standard hasn't approved or denied my claim in over a year. They keep promising to look at it 'next week'
My husband is covered by a Standard STD/LTD non-ERISA plan. He has a very rare neuromuscular disorder and was hospitalized in intensive care, was off work for 6 weeks (wai... read more >
Reply
Standard
I waited 5 weeks just to be told I can't receive benefits
After working overtime and stressing behind my job for the past 5 years, it resulted in me being diagnosed with retinopathy hypertension, at the age of 29, on 12/10/2018. ... read more >
Reply
Standard
The Standard will threaten to withhold your pay until you sign every document that they send you. The worst part is when they consider back payment for SSDI benefits
First of all, the worst thing that could ever happen to a hard-working person is a permanent disability. Fighting to secure payment is hard enough when you are well. Let a... read more >
Standard
Standard's sudden denial was inexplicable
I was placed on disability by my doctor with a diagnosis of Cognitive Impairment (supported by both a neurologist and a neuropsychologist) which severely affects my abilit... read more >
Standard
Standard has keep me jumping through hoops for years
I have been on LTD with The Standard since September 2011. The have had me jumping through hoops for all these years. Very rude if I call and ask a question. They say they... read more >
Reply
Standard
Mental health LTD should be covered under the Mental Health Parity Act
My company contracted with Standard for our short and long term disability policies. In Jan 2014 I was on STD, which turned into LTD with a waiting period, which was tough... read more >
Answered Questions by Our Lawyers
(28)
Showing 8 of 28 Answered Questions
Q: Do I have to pay back LTD after receiving SSDI?
A: Hello. In most group disability policies there is offset language which states you must pay back any LTD that ... Read More >
Q: Non-taxable benefits have become taxable.
A: I am sorry to hear what you are going through. We have seen you exact fact pattern with tax on ssdi when you w... Read More >
Q: How do I ensure Standard makes a timely decision with regard to my claim?
A: Matthew, we are sorry to hear that you are having difficulty with your claim. While the insurance company does... Read More >
Q: Why can my employer hold my disability check after The Standard sends it to them? Can I file a grievance with them?
A: Lucas, it sounds like your claim for STD benefits is under a policy that is self-funded by your employer. Thus... Read More >
Q: Should I contact you before submitting my application for a private disability benefit?
A: It is in your best interest to contact us as early as possible if you think you are going to need to file a lo... Read More >
Q: Is there any case law in which a state government employee LTD plan decided to drop the 24 month mental health limitation? Has there been any success against a state government and Standard using ADA Title I (employee) and 3 (insurance company) from a discrimination basis?
A: Marie, thank you for your compliments on our website. We strive very hard to get as much information out there... Read More >
Q: How can Standard deny my claim and expect me to work when I am disabled?
A: Debbie, unfortunately this situation occurs often as there are two different departments reviewing your claim ... Read More >
Q: I'm waiting to hear back about my appeal. Should I hire an attorney?
A: Pam, if an appeal has already been submitted there may be very little an attorney could do at this point until... Read More >
Helpful Videos
(888)
Showing 12 of 888 Videos
Disability Benefit Tips
(330)
Showing 8 of 330 Benefit Tips
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
At Dell & Schaefer, we've helped hundreds of clients recover long term disability benefit... Read More >
How to Prevent Standard Insurance Company from Denying Disability Benefits
If you have an individual or group long term disability policy with Standard, you may assume ... Read More >
Can My Insurance Company Terminate My Disability Benefits After 24 Months if My Mental Nervous Disorder Contributes to But is Not The Sole Cause of My Disability?
The "But For Test"In the case of George v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, The district court held that RSL did not abuse its di... Read More >
Dentist and doctors: beware of the Standard Insurance Company Group's long-term disability policy
The Standard Insurance Company sells multiple different long-term disability policies to dentist and other medical professionals. The differen... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
If you're seeking long term disability benefits from an insurance company, you may be concern... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
When you're seeking disability benefits under a long term disability policy, your medical rec... Read More >
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
One thing many long term disability claimants don't know about (or expect) from the claims re... Read More >
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Getting a denial letter from your disability insurance company is one of the ultimate insults... Read More >
Dell Disability Cases
(375)
Showing 8 of 375 Dell Disability Cases
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Long Term Disability Benefits
Our client was employed with the State of Oregon as a Technical Support Representative. She ... Read More >
After Two Appeals The Standard Insurance Approves Short & Long Term Disability Benefits for Nurse
Prior to filing for disability, our client was a Registered Nurse employed as a Senior Case Manager for United Healthcare. Our client was a de... Read More >
Standard Approves Disability Benefits to Attorney with Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia is a multifaceted illness that can affect every aspect of one’s life. While most people are aware of the debilitating pain and ... Read More >
Standard overturns decision to deny disabled Project Manager long-term disability insurance benefits after first Appeal
Terry had worked as a project manager for a large national health group earning over $85,000 annually, until type 2 diabetes left him disabled... Read More >
Another long term disability claim is reinstated after Disability Attorney Alexander Palamara successfully argues The Standard mishandled preexisting condition investigation
Insurance companies often deny benefits based on an inability to complete a preexisting condition investigation without any consideration to t... Read More >
Standard Overturns Denial of Benefits to Shareholder of Major Law Firm
When Mr. L contacted us he had recently left a major law firm where he had been working for 27 years. Mr. L, a commercial finance and real est... Read More >
Disability Attorney Alex Palamara wins LTD Benefits for Police Officer Denied by Standard
Disability insurance companies are always trying to deny disability claims based upon a pre-e... Read More >
Standard Overturns Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits
Prior to contacting our office our client had been on disability with Standard due to Ulcerative Colitis and several other serious gastrointes... Read More >
Disability Lawsuit Stories
(765)
Reviews from Our Clients
