Radio personality files lawsuit against UNUM to recover disability benefits

A Radio Station employee and her Montana disability lawyer filed a lawsuit against UNUM Group in Montana Federal Court alleging that the insurer violated the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) when it wrongfully denied her entitled disability benefits per a policy she had with her employer, KMSO Radio.

As a shareholder in Sheila Callahan and Friends, Inc. d/b/a KMSO Radio, Sheila M. is entitled to disability benefits under a group policy. The Claimant fractured her ankle on May 14, 2009, underwent surgery to repair the break on May 22, 2009, and applied for disability benefits in July 2009. Not acknowledging receipt of the claimant’s claim until September 2009, UNUM still paid the claimant long term disability benefits from August 13, 2009 to February 12, 2010, but paid an incorrect amount of benefits because the insurer calculated her disability benefits payments by averaging her post-deduction income when they were supposed to calculate the amount of her disability benefits by using her gross income in the determination of her disability rate.

Background of the Disability and the Need for Disability Benefits

The claimant’s problems arose when the anesthesiologist present during her ankle surgery had “difficulty entubating (the claimant) for the administration of anesthesia. Spending a prolonged time in the operating room for her ankle surgery, (the claimant) emerged from surgery with speaking difficulties and problems projecting her voice.” As a radio personality, the claimant’s profession is dependent on voice projection. After the incident, prolonged speaking of more than five minutes caused the claimant to lose her voice entirely. Referred to a speech pathologist, the claimant found herself unable to perform the material and substantial duties of her occupation as a radio personality and thus was eligible for long term disability benefits.

In addition to underpaying the claimant’s long term disability benefits, UNUM also denied the claimant benefits after May 13, 2010, “asserting that she no longer satisfied the definition of disability” per her plan. In November 2010, the claimant appealed the insurer’s denial and provided the insurance company with affidavits “attesting to the continuation of her vocal problems as well as tax and income information in support of her claim.” In March 2011, UNUM denied the claimant’s appeal claiming that the “information it possessed” in reference to her disability was “insufficient to reverse the prior closure decision” and stated that the claimant “no longer satisfied the Plan definition of disability.”

The Claimant and Her Disability Attorney File a Complaint against UNUM

In her complaint, the claimant and her disability lawyer state that “despite numerous attempts by (the claimant) and her husband to rectify the error” in which the insurer ‘used a calculation other than the one provided in the terms of the Plan,” UNUM failed to properly address the problem. The Claimant had previously informed the insurer that the income amounts that she did receive were incorrect, but UNUM failed to re-calculate the amount or correct the situation. And on top of underpaying the claimant for the disability benefits they did provide, the insurer later terminated those same benefits even though her medical condition had not improved. Alleging that UNUM did not properly conduct a “reasonable investigation in its determination” of her disability benefit payment, the claimant and her disability lawyer request that the insurer restore losses to the claimant for its breach of fiduciary duties, re-instate her disability benefits, current, retroactive and future benefits per ERISA § 502(a)(2) and § 409(a), attorney’s fees and costs and any other relief the District Court “deems just and proper.”

Leave a comment or ask us a question

Questions About Hiring Us

Do you help Unum claimants nationwide?

We represent Unum clients nationwide and we encourage you to contact us for a FREE immediate phone consultation with one of our experienced disability insurance attorneys.

Can you help with a Unum disability insurance policy?

Our disability insurance lawyers help policy holders seeking short or long term disability insurance benefits from Unum. We have helped thousands of disability insurance claimants nationwide with monthly disability benefits. With more than 40 years of disability insurance experience we have helped individuals in almost every occupation and we are familiar with the disability income policies offered by Unum.

How do you help Unum claimants?

Our lawyers help individuals that have either purchased a Unum long term disability insurance policy from an insurance company or obtained short or long term disability insurance coverage as a benefit from their employer.

Our experienced lawyers can assist with Unum:

  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Appeals of Disability Benefit Denials
  • ERISA and Non-ERISA Disability Benefit Lawsuits
  • Applying For Short or Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Daily Handling & Management of Your Disability Claim
  • Disability Insurance Lump-Sum Buyout or Settlement Negotiations

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Dell & Schaefer Client Reviews   *****

Cynthia B.

I learned in March 2014, that my LTD insurance provider was auditing my case. Two weeks later I received a denial letter. I didn’t even have time to provide the info requests to my doctors much less have them completed and sent back to the LTD company. I promptly called the rep who fumbled about for a few minutes then stated that the letter was mistakenly sent to me. The rep (I’ll refer to him as L) was often rude and aggressive even bordering on threatening on the phone.

They did not contact me from early June, I think, until September when L called me to inform me that my payments had already been stopped and a denial letter was in route. This letter informed me I had not complied in getting information from my Doctors and, he claimed in part that since they were not responsive to the insurance company, I was now in receipt of this denial letter. After all he claimed, I really was just fine (not quoted but implied in my opinion). I had not heard a word from L in 3 months prior to that call. I had been promised I no longer had to talk to L after I complained to the insurance company. How surprised I was to pick up a call from L. He seemed quite pleased to let me know they had already stopped my payments. Long story short, like you perhaps, I was scared and had no idea where to turn. Did I need to find a local attorney? That’s what I started doing. I quickly learned there were a lot of people who had or were currently going through the same thing. Misery really does seem to love company.

I started reading other people’s stories and often ran into the Dell & Schaefer name. I was skeptical. I mean, who chooses an attorney over the internet? I learned there were topics this law firm had placed on You Tube? I intently read everyone of them. I admittedly was impressed as they carefully described the process and what to expect. I read more than once. I called the national number listed. I made my choice when I spoke with Alexander Palamara, Esc. He was very informative, confident and encouraging. All of which I was not feeling prior to that call. I made my decision and never looked back. I knew without question that I would never be able to win this case on my own. I was so naive that I didn’t understand that what I thought was a very reputable and certainly well known Insurance company, would blatantly lie. They did. My attorney learned during the discovery process that they had, had much of the information they said they never got. They had had it for months. I never had to wait for response from Alexander, my attorney. If he was not available, his assistant would contact me. I was always in the loop and well informed. I was still shocked at the glaring discrepancies noted in my filing as opposed to what was noted by the insurance company’s denial letter. Some say, “Trust but verify”. I would Strongly recommend, “Don’t trust And Verify!” Act as early as you are able. Expect to provide your doctors names, addresses and phone numbers and dates. Then expect to be well represented. It’s well worth your time and money to pursue your case with Dell & Schaefer.

***** 5 stars based on 202 reviews

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us