Missouri Court denies MetLife’s motion to dismiss long-term disability claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

Donna Blake was an employee of Express Scripts, covered under both a long term disability plan and a short term disability plan, when she applied and was denied for short term disability coverage.  After internal appeals, Mrs. Blake brought her claim to the United States District Court, Missouri Eastern Division.  Upon the settlement of Mrs. Blake’s claim for short term disability, she claimed that she would be prevented from filing for long term benefits, because the denial of her short term disability claim, “prevented her from applying for LTD benefits from the LTD Plan, as she was required to satisfy the applicable period of STD before becoming eligible for LTD benefits.”

She claimed that she had exhausted all administrative remedies available to her when it came to filing for the long term disability because of the fact that she could not satisfy the applicable period of short term disability,  which is twenty-six weeks.  Typically, employees are not allowed to apply for long term disability benefits until they’ve been on short term disability for more than twenty-six weeks.

Met Life asked for a dismissal of this claim because they say Mrs. Blake has not exhausted administrative remedies available under the plan.  They say her case is premature, because she never even said she applied for long term benefits.  They say that her claim that applying for long term benefits would have been futile is not necessarily true.  They say that she has asked for a long term benefits application but has not received one yet, and on the grounds that she has not even applied, the claim should be dismissed.

Mrs. Black maintains that because of the fact that she was not able to obtain short term benefits, technically, Met Life would have grounds to refuse long term benefits to her.  Because long term benefits are scheduled to take over as soon as short term benefits run out (provided the proper records are shown and the individual is considered disabled) Mrs. Black wouldn’t normally even be considered for long term benefits.

Met Life stated that because Mrs. Black settled her claim of short term disability, she has “eliminated any previous obstacle to plaintiff’s application for LTD benefits.”  Met Life promised to consider the medical documentation that Mrs. Black would submit in order to apply for long term benefits.  They claim they’ve given literature to Mrs. Black’s attorney regarding the long term benefit plan, and maintain their stance.

The court took a long look at the motion to dismiss from Met Life.  Because what Mrs. Black is saying is correct,  that she would automatically be denied long term disability benefits that were set to kick in after the short term disability benefits because she was unable to receive the latter,  the court finds in her favor and refuses to dismiss the claim. Therefore, in a case where an individual may not have been on short term disability for the required time before applying for long term benefits, it does not mean that they cannot receive the long term benefits.

The reason in this case that the court found in favor of Mrs. Black pertains to the disability contract of Met Life.  The disability contract states that once the short term benefits have exhausted themselves, the long term benefits would begin paying so long as the individual submitted the appropriate proof of disability.  It does not state anywhere that an individual can apply for long term benefits if they have not exhausted short term benefits first.

Because of the court’s decision, Mrs. Black can apply for the long term disability benefits and with enough medical evidence, may be able to receive it.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

View videos, articles, resolved cases and claimant reviews about your specific disability insurance company.

Leave a comment or ask us a question

FAQ

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews

Bruce R. (Arizona)

Steve Dell has done an exceptional job with my disability application process. The firm is extremely well managed. They have acquired an incredible amount of experience over many years. I recommend them for disability insurance claims without reservation. 

Don (Florida)

I called this firm a few months ago completely disparaged due to a company cutting off disability benefits at a time that nearly caused me to lose everything.

Attorney Alex Palmera and Danielle worked hard to reach an amicable settlement and my case was settled a few months later. This is a good firm and the specific expertise in disability claims saved me countless hours of hassle at a time when an already fragile state existed.

Thank you Mr. Palamara and Danielle.

Sandra B. (Arkansas)

I have nothing but good things to say about how my buyout was handled with my disability claim. The level of professionalism was amazing. All of my questions and concerns were answered either by Danielle L. or Alex P. in such a timely manner and with such care I would recommend them in a heartbeat to anyone needing to approach their provider with buyout options.

They did a fantastic job communicating between the provider and me, always keeping my best interest at heart and always answering my many many questions. They really did take most of the stress out of this whole situation. I would give them a 10 out of 10 for every step of this crazy journey. Thank you so much for helping me through this.

Brenda R. (New York)

I needed assistance with an appeal for a LTD claim that was initially denied. Stephen understood what needed to happen to win the appeal and he did win the appeal for me.

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us