Michigan Court Remands Aetna to Reconsider Disability Benefit Denial

In Coulter v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a Michigan federal court found that Aetna committed a number of errors in its review of claimant Sharon Coulter’s medical file. In addition, it misinterpreted three separate Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCE). The Benefit Appeals Committee (BAC) for Alcoa, Coulter’s employer, relied on the information provided to it by Aetna to terminate Coulter’s long term disability benefits.

After detailed analysis of Aetna’s reasoning behind its recommendation to BAC to terminate Coulter’s benefits, the court stated, “Certain erroneous assumptions underlying Alcoa’s final decision render it arbitrary and capricious, and the Court remands to the plan administrator for reconsideration of Plaintiff’s claim for benefits.”

Summary of Basic Facts

After working for six years in the manufacturing section of Alcoa, plaintiff Sharon Coulter quit her job and was awarded short term disability benefits due to her bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome medical diagnosis. She later underwent shoulder surgery and was left with chronic pain and inability to resume her own occupation, so she was granted long term disability benefits. Even when the definition of disability changed to require her to be unable to work at “any occupation for which she was reasonably suited…,” her long-term disability benefits continued.

When Aetna took over as plan administrator of Alcoa, they reviewed Coulter’s medical file. The BAC for Alcoa relied on the information it received from Aetna and terminated her long term disability benefits. She lost her administrative appeal and so brought this ERISA lawsuit.

Court’s Analysis of the Evidence

Here, the final decision to terminate benefits was made by the BAC. Therefore, the court only analyzed the information provided by Aetna to the BAC that the BAC relied on it in making its decision. The court found that the BACs “own independent analysis of Plaintiff’’ disability claim appears to rest on the mischaracterization of the medical evidence…” Specifically, Aetna reported that Coulter could do “light to medium work” when three FCEs and medical opinions all found her capable of only performing sedentary work.

In addition, Aetna’s analysis of other jobs available to the plaintiff was flawed and, according to the court, “not supported by the record.” The jobs Aetna claimed she could do had no openings and employers who were interviewed were “‘unsure’ of whether they would be hiring in the next six months. There is no other evidence of anticipated job opportunity.”

Court’s Decision to Remand

The court struggled with whether it should award benefits or remand for reconsideration. Ultimately, it decided that remand to the plan administrator for reconsideration was the proper remedy finding that, “On this record, there is no clear entitlement to benefits and, in light of the above-mentioned defects, the Court believes that there are additional facts to develop and findings to be made as to Plaintiff’s functional ability and whether she is physically suited for the jobs selected for her.”

This case was not handled by our office, but it may provide claimants guidance when their claim for benefits is unreasonably terminated. If you need assistance with a similar matter, please contact any of our lawyers for a free consultation.

Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

View videos, articles, resolved cases and claimant reviews about your specific disability insurance company.

Leave a comment or ask us a question


Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.


Bruce R. (Arizona)

Steve Dell has done an exceptional job with my disability application process. The firm is extremely well managed. They have acquired an incredible amount of experience over many years. I recommend them for disability insurance claims without reservation. 

Don (Florida)

I called this firm a few months ago completely disparaged due to a company cutting off disability benefits at a time that nearly caused me to lose everything.

Attorney Alex Palmera and Danielle worked hard to reach an amicable settlement and my case was settled a few months later. This is a good firm and the specific expertise in disability claims saved me countless hours of hassle at a time when an already fragile state existed.

Thank you Mr. Palamara and Danielle.

Sandra B. (Arkansas)

I have nothing but good things to say about how my buyout was handled with my disability claim. The level of professionalism was amazing. All of my questions and concerns were answered either by Danielle L. or Alex P. in such a timely manner and with such care I would recommend them in a heartbeat to anyone needing to approach their provider with buyout options.

They did a fantastic job communicating between the provider and me, always keeping my best interest at heart and always answering my many many questions. They really did take most of the stress out of this whole situation. I would give them a 10 out of 10 for every step of this crazy journey. Thank you so much for helping me through this.

Brenda R. (New York)

I needed assistance with an appeal for a LTD claim that was initially denied. Stephen understood what needed to happen to win the appeal and he did win the appeal for me.

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us