MetLife reverses decision to terminate LTD benefits after Dell & Schaefer files an appeal showing Metlife completely ignored physical conditions of claimant

The claimant is a 44 year old female who worked as a Campaign Delivery Director for American Express. She was forced to go out of work on disability on April 7, 2014, after being psychiatrically hospitalized due to the onset of severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition to her behavioral health symptoms, she also suffers from chronic diffuse pain and had been diagnosed with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), autoimmune syndrome, and fibromyalgia. She applied for Long Term Disability insurance benefits under the terms of her policy with MetLife. MetLife approved her claim as of her date of disability of April 7, 2014, and in a letter dated November 17, 2014 informed her that her claim for LTD benefits was payable effective October 5, 2014. MetLife further advised that:

Therefore, after paying benefits for a period of 24 months, MetLife arbitrarily terminated her LTD benefits effective October 4, 2016, on the basis that she met the maximum benefit duration for a limited condition (mental illness) under the terms of the Policy.

MetLife blatantly ignored all physical claims and automatically terminated benefits after 24 months

Upon further review of MetLife’s claim file, it is evident that its reviews, assessments, and conclusion were not only flawed but clearly tailored to meet MetLife’s goal of averting further liability under the LTD policy. MetLife ignored the medical evidence of significant physical impairments due to her “non-limited” conditions of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, autoimmune syndrome, and fibromyalgia which supported ongoing restrictions and limitations that would have precluded her ability to perform the material duties of her job or any gainful work beyond October 4, 2016. Furthermore, given the ambiguous nature of the LTD Policy’s mental health limitation, MetLife’s application was not appropriate as it did not afford consideration to the causative nature of her disability.

MetLife determination gave no deference to the impact non-limited conditions have on overall functionality

The medical evidence demonstrated that the claimant had a long-standing history of severe diffuse joint pain. She was initially diagnosed with an auto immune syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) which is a hereditary connective tissue disorder characterized by joint hypermobility, widespread musculoskeletal pain and tissue fragility. She was later diagnosed with fibromyalgia as well.

She commenced treatment with acupuncture in early January of 2015, subsequent to her disability effective date, due to progressively worsening symptoms of joint pain particularly in her neck, shoulders, back, hands, knees, and thighs. It was noted her condition worsened with prolonged sitting, extended work hours, stress, anxiety, sickness and weather change. The claimant was seen on a weekly basis for acupuncture treatment to reduce the severity of her pain but received minimal to no improvement.

In February of 2015, the claimant commenced care with a rheumatologist, Dr. Levine. The initial evaluation on February 25, 2015 confirmed that she was hyper- extensible on examination and that her pain was related to EDS. However, during a subsequent visit on July 21, 2015, it was noted that she continued to have chronic pain with aches in her joints and at times her right hip intermittently popped out. Laboratory testing performed revealed ANA 2+ as well as low complements. In addition, Dr. Levine confirmed numerous tender points on examination. These findings, as well as her associated depression, trouble sleeping, and sense of feeling better after cardiovascular exercise were noted to be consistent with a diagnosis of Fibromyalgia. Dr. Levine further reiterated that her pain was also attributable to EDS.

In a Physician Statement from dated September 28, 2015, Dr. Levine opined, based on her physical examination, she was only able to sit 2-4 hours total and intermittently in an 8 – hour workday due to her physical non-limited conditions. She further noted limitations in fine motor coordination due to “finger pain & swelling”. Dr. Levine confirmed that she had not yet attained maximum medical improvement and noted that she required frequent breaks and rest due to body pain and fatigue.

MetLife admits claimant is disabled due to a physical condition and overturns its decision after appeal

MetLife’s actions to include selectively ignoring the medical evidence of physical disability and failure to perform a complete and thorough review of all of the claimant’s disabling conditions were arbitrary and capricious and demonstrated an abuse of any purported discretion it may have under the LTD Policy. Clearly the medical evidence demonstrated that her disability extended far beyond her mental diagnoses. As confirmed in Dr. Levine’s follow up office note dated January 19. 2017:

She continues to struggle with body pain and fatigue. She has some joint pain, particularly in hips bilaterally, as well as pain in the neck, shoulders, and upper back. She fatigues easily, both physically and mentally. It is evident based on the aforementioned that even in absence of mental diagnosis; she would continue to be disabled in accordance with the terms of her LTD policy due to her chronic pain stemming from her rheumatological conditions.

MetLife erred in its decision to deny benefits based solely on the policy’s mental health limitation. After reviewing an extensive appeal submitted by attorney Rachel Alters, Metlife overturned its determination to terminate benefits and reinstated the claimant’s LTD benefits paying all back benefits owed. The claimant remains on claim for her inability to work in any gainful occupation due to fibromyalgia and EDS.

Read more Metlife disability cases articles.

DISABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY INFORMATION
Videos, Questions, Resolved Cases, Lawsuit Summaries & Company Reviews

disability insurance companies complaints

View videos, articles, resolved cases and claimant reviews about your specific disability insurance company.

FAQ

Do you work in my state?

Yes. We are a national disability insurance law firm that is available to represent you regardless of where you live in the United States. We have partner lawyers in every state and we have filed lawsuits in most federal courts nationwide. Our disability lawyers represent disability claimants at all stages of a claim for disability insurance benefits. There is nothing that our lawyers have not seen in the disability insurance world.

What are your fees?

Since we represent disability insurance claimants at different stages of a disability insurance claim we offer a variety of different fee options. We understand that claimants living on disability insurance benefits have a limited source of income; therefore we always try to work with the claimant to make our attorney fees as affordable as possible.

The three available fee options are a contingency fee agreement (no attorney fee or cost unless we make a recovery), hourly fee or fixed flat rate.

In every case we provide each client with a written fee agreement detailing the terms and conditions. We always offer a free initial phone consultation and we appreciate the opportunity to work with you in obtaining payment of your disability insurance benefits.

Do I have to come to your office to work with your law firm?

No. For purposes of efficiency and to reduce expenses for our clients we have found that 99% of our clients prefer to communicate via telephone, e-mail, fax, GoToMeeting.com sessions, or Skype. If you prefer an initial in-person meeting please let us know. A disability company will never require you to come to their office and similarly we are set up so that we handle your entire claim without the need for you to come to our office.

How can I contact you?

When you call us during normal business hours you will immediately speak with a disability attorney. We can be reached at 800-682-8331 or by email. Lawyer and staff must return all client calls same day. Client emails are usually replied to within the same business day and seem to be the preferred and most efficient method of communication for most clients.

Reviews

Bruce R. (Arizona)

Steve Dell has done an exceptional job with my disability application process. The firm is extremely well managed. They have acquired an incredible amount of experience over many years. I recommend them for disability insurance claims without reservation. 

Don (Florida)

I called this firm a few months ago completely disparaged due to a company cutting off disability benefits at a time that nearly caused me to lose everything.

Attorney Alex Palmera and Danielle worked hard to reach an amicable settlement and my case was settled a few months later. This is a good firm and the specific expertise in disability claims saved me countless hours of hassle at a time when an already fragile state existed.

Thank you Mr. Palamara and Danielle.

Sandra B. (Arkansas)

I have nothing but good things to say about how my buyout was handled with my disability claim. The level of professionalism was amazing. All of my questions and concerns were answered either by Danielle L. or Alex P. in such a timely manner and with such care I would recommend them in a heartbeat to anyone needing to approach their provider with buyout options.

They did a fantastic job communicating between the provider and me, always keeping my best interest at heart and always answering my many many questions. They really did take most of the stress out of this whole situation. I would give them a 10 out of 10 for every step of this crazy journey. Thank you so much for helping me through this.

Brenda R. (New York)

I needed assistance with an appeal for a LTD claim that was initially denied. Stephen understood what needed to happen to win the appeal and he did win the appeal for me.

Michael C. (Virginia)

Greg Dell and his assistant Anneli have been extremely responsive and helpful, not only our initial consultations, but in follow-ups 1 and 2 years later with the insurance company to ensure that they comply with their agreements (which they did), as well as a separate and only slightly-related inquiry about our health insurance. I always hear back from them very quickly, which is rare and greatly appreciated.

Jeff P. (Oklahoma)

After a very long and frustrating ordeal to keep my LTD payments coming I decided to seek assistance from and attorney. After much research and asking those in the legal profession Dell & Schaefer seemed to be the top choice. I reached out and Alex Palamara was the attorney assigned to my case. All I can say is the experience was outstanding. Both Alex and his Paralegal, Danielle Lauria were excellent to work with. They were very kind, concerned, understanding of my frustrations and treated me with the utmost respect. Communication was excellent with regular updates and telling me what I could expect in each stage of the process.

Alex was also very straight forward with what to expect and no pie in the sky promises or expectations were made. In the end we won our case and I believe it was solely due to their experience and knowledge of not only the laws but the insurance companies as a whole. I would highly recommend them and am very grateful for the help they afforded to me.

Chad B. (Illinois)

I originally spoke with 3 other long term disability lawyers about my case before contacting Dell and Schaefer. None of those law firms would take it. They said the chances of me winning was not good. After finding Dell and Schaefer online I spoke with one of the attorneys that has since left. He did take my case but later it was picked up by Rachel Alters. Rachel is amazing and a very intelligent attorney. She not only won my case but also was able to get my back pay for 6 months.

I also cannot say enough about Sonia Nogueira. Sonia was always quick to answer any of my questions. I would usually hear back from her within hours of sending her a email. I do not know where I would be if I hadn’t contacted them. My family and I cannot thank them enough. Don’t let an insurance company tell you they are not responsible for paying you. I paid them for 20 years monthly and they looked for any reason they could not to have to pay me when I needed my benefit. Thank you Rachel and Sonia for all you guys do.

Speak With An Attorney Now

Request a free legal consultation: Call 800-682-8331 or Email Us